Guided by Self-Determination Theory, this study examined the relative importance of perceived coach supports in facilitating at-risk boys’ motivation toward physical activity. Participants were 76 at-risk boys (Mage = 11.87 years, SD = 1.22) at a summer sports camp in the southwestern USA. Data were collected using two established questionnaires and analyzed through commonality analysis. Perceived supports for autonomy, competence, and relatedness together explained 25.5% of variance in autonomous motivation, and perceived competence support was the most powerful predictor. In predicting amotivation (R2 = .19, p <.001), perceived competence support and perceived relatedness support were significant individual predictors while perceived autonomy support emerged as a suppressor. Perceived competence support appeared to be the strongest predictor of autonomous motivation, and the three supports were all important to diminishing amotivation. The results suggest that in similar physical activity settings, coaches should provide supports for competency, connectedness, and autonomy among participants.
LiuJXiangPMcBrideR, et al.
Changes in at-risk boy’s intrinsic motivation toward physical activity: a three-year longitudinal study.Meas Phys Educ Exercise Sci2015;
19: 200–207.
2.
DeciELKoestnerRRyanRM.Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: reconsidered once again.Rev Educ Res2001;
71: 1–27.
3.
RyanRMDeciEL.Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.Am Psychol2000;
55: 68–78.
4.
RyanRMWilliamsGCPatrickH, et al.
Self-determination theory and physical activity: the dynamics of motivation in development and wellness.Hellenic J Psychol2009;
6: 107–124.
5.
Reichwein ZientekLThompsonB.Commonality analysis: partitioning variance to facilitate better understanding of data.J Early Interv2006;
28: 299–307.
6.
NimonKReioTG.Regression commonality analysis: a technique for quantitative theory building.Hum Resour Dev Rev2011;
10: 329–340.
7.
DeciELRyanRM.Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health.Can Psychol2008;
49: 182–185.
8.
PulidoJJSánchez-OlivaDSánchez-MiguelPA, et al.
Sport commitment in young soccer players: a self-determination perspective.Int J Sports Sci Coaching2018;
13: 243–252.
9.
OwenKBSmithJLubansDR, et al.
Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prev Med2014;
67: 270–279.
10.
HaASNgJYY.Autonomous motivation predicts 7-day physical activity in Hong Kong students.Appl Psychol2015;
7: 214–229.
11.
ChenWHypnarAJ.Elementary school students’ self-determination in physical education and attitudes toward physical activity.J Teach Phys Educ2015;
34: 189–209.
12.
HaslemLWilkinsonCPrusakKA, et al.
Relationships between health-related fitness knowledge, perceived competence, self-determination, and physical activity behaviors of high school students.J Teach Phys Educ2016;
35: 27–37.
13.
PatrickHWilliamsGC.Self-determination theory: its application to health behavior and complementarity with motivational interviewing.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2012;
9: 1–12.
14.
BagøienTEHalvariHNesheimH.Self-determined motivation in physical education and its links to motivation for leisure-time physical activity, physical activity, and well-being in general.Percept Motor Skills2010;
111: 407–432.
15.
CoatsworthJDConroyDE.The effects of autonomy-supportive coaching, need satisfaction, and self-perceptions on initiative and identity in youth swimmers.Dev Psychol2009;
45: 320–328.
16.
BarkoukisVHaggerMS.The trans-contextual model: perceived learning and performance motivational climates as analogues of perceived autonomy support.Eur J Psychol Educ2013;
28: 353–372.
17.
CoxADuncheonNMcDavidL.Peers and teachers as sources of relatedness perceptions, motivation, and affective responses in physical education.Res Q Exerc Sport2009;
80: 765–773.
18.
GibbonsSL.Relatedness-supportive learning environment for girls in physical education.Learn Landscapes2014;
7: 139–150.
19.
GillisonFBStandageMSkevingtonSM.The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class.Psychol Sport Exerc2013;
14: 342–352.
20.
BernardDMartinJJKulikN.Self-determination theory and well-being in the health care profession.J Appl Biobehav Res2014;
19: 157–170.
21.
TandonPSZhouCSallisJF, et al.
Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2012;
9: 88.
22.
DrenowatzCEisenmannJCPfeifferKA, et al.
Influence of socio-economic status on habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior in 8- to 11-year old children.BMC Public Health2010; 10: 214.
23.
von HippelPTPowellBDowneyDB, et al.
The effect of school on overweight in childhood: gain in body mass index during the school year and during summer vacation.Am J Public Health2007;
97: 696–702.
24.
American Camp Association. Who we are, 2019.
25.
WardSParkerMHenschel-PellettH, et al.
Forecasting the storm: student perspectives throughout a Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR)-based positive youth development program. Agora PE Sport2012;
14: 230–247.
26.
WilsonDKGriffinSSaundersRP, et al.
Formative evaluation of a motivational intervention for increasing physical activity in underserved youth.Eval Program Plann2006;
29: 260–268.
27.
NewtonMWatsonDLKimM-S, et al.
Understanding motivation of underserved youth in physical activity settings.Youth Soc2006;
37: 348–371.
28.
VierlingKKStandageMTreasureDC.Predicting attitudes and physical activity in an “at-risk” minority youth sample: a test of self-determination theory.Psychol Sport Exerc2007;
8: 795–817.
29.
ThompsonB.Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach.
New York, NY:
Guilford, 2006.
30.
ThompsonFTLevineDU.Examples of easily explainable suppressor variables in multiple regression research. Mult Linear Regression Viewpoints1997;
24: 11–13.
31.
LancasterBP.Defining and interpreting suppressor effects: Advantages and limitations. In: ThompsonB (ed.). Advances in social science methodology.
Stamford, CT:
JAI Press, 1999.
32.
Ray-MukherjeeJNimonKMukherjeeS, et al.
Using commonality analysis in multiple regressions: a tool to decompose regression effects in the face of multicollinearity.Methods Ecol Evol2014;
5: 320–328.
33.
MosstonMAshworthS.Teaching physical education. 5th ed.
San Francisco, CA:
Benjamin Cummings, 2002.
34.
HellisonD.Teaching peronsal and social responsibility through physical activity. 3rd ed.Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2011.
35.
ShenBLiWSunH, et al.
The influence of inadequate teacher-to-student social support on amotivation of physical education students.J Teach Phys Educ2010;
29: 417–432.
36.
PelletierLGBeaudrySSharpE, et al. The Interpersonal Behaviors Scale: a measure of autonomy support, competence and relatedness in different life domains, 2008 (Unpublished). Ontario, Canada: University of Ottawa.
37.
MarklandDATobinV.A modification to the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation.J Sport Exerc Psychol2004;
26: 191–196.
38.
No-inKTuicomepeeAJiamjarasrangsiW, et al.
Validation of Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) and dietary self-regulation (DSR) in overweight high school students in Thailand. J Health Res2015;
29: 269–276.
39.
LiuJDChungP-KZhangC-Q, et al.
Chinese-translated Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2: evidence from university students in the Mainland and Hong Kong of China.J Sport Health Sci2015;
4: 228–234.
40.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 23.0) [Computer software].
Armonk, NY:
IBM Corp., 2014.
41.
MahalanobisPC.On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India1936;
2: 49–55.
42.
BurdenskiT.Evaluating univariate, bivariate, and multivariate normality using graphical and statistical procedures.Mult Linear Regression Viewpoints2000;
26: 15–28.
43.
NunnallyJC.Psychometric theory. 2nd ed.
New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill, 1978.
44.
SekaranU.Research methods for business.
New York, NY:
John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
45.
StandageMDudaJLNtoumanisN.Students' motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: a self-determination theory approach.Res Q Exerc Sport2006;
77: 100–110.
46.
González-CutreDSiciliaÁ.Motivation and exercise dependence.Res Q Exerc Sport2012;
83: 318–329.
47.
FentonSAMDudaJLQuestedE, et al.
Coach autonomy support predicts autonomous motivation and daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time in youth sport participants.Psychol Sport Exerc2014;
15: 453–463.
48.
SpinathBSteinmayrR.The roles of competence beliefs and goal orientations for change in intrinsic motivation.J Educ Psychol2012;
104: 1135–1148.
49.
NathansLLOswaldFLNimonK.Interpreting multiple linear regression: a guidebook of variable importance. Pract Assess Res Eval2012;
17: 1–19.
50.
BanackHRSabistonCMBloomGA.Coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation of paralympic athletes.Res Q Exerc Sport2011;
82: 722–730.
51.
ShenBMcCaughtryNMartinJ, et al.
Effects of teacher autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning in physical education.Res Q Exerc Sport2009;
80: 44–53.
52.
How YewMJohn Wang CheeK. The effectiveness of an autonomy-supportive teaching structure in physical education.RICYDE2016;
12: 5–28.
53.
RyanRMDeciEL.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions.Contemp Educ Psychol2000;
25: 54–67.
54.
SheldonKMFilakV.Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: new evidence that all three needs matter.Br J Soc Psychol2008;
47: 267–283.
