The effects of rational and irrational coach team talks on cognitive appraisal and achievement goal orientation were examined. During the half-time interval of a 60 min football match, 25 male varsity football athletes (Mage = 20.20; SD ± 1.38 years) received a rational (n = 13) or an irrational (n = 12) team talk from a coach. Irrational and rational beliefs were measured before the football match. Task engagement, cognitive appraisal (challenge and threat), and achievement goal orientation (approach and avoidance) regarding second-half football performance were measured following team talk delivery. Athletes in the rational team talk condition reported significantly lower threat appraisal and avoidance goal orientation than athletes in the irrational team talk condition. No significant between-condition differences emerged for challenge appraisal and approach goal orientation. For coaching practice, data suggest that communicating rational or irrational beliefs to football athletes through a half-time team talk will influence appraisal and achievement goal orientation regarding upcoming performance.
TurnerMJ. Smarter thinking in sport. Psychologist2014; 27: 596–599.
3.
SzentagotaiAJonesJThe behavioral consequences of irrational beliefs. In: DavidDLynnSJEllisA (eds). Rational and irrational beliefs in human functioning and disturbances, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 75–97.
4.
TurnerMJSlaterMJBarkerJB. Not the end of the world: the effects of rational emotive behavior therapy on the irrational beliefs of elite academy athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol2014; 26: 144–156.
5.
TurnerMJBarkerJB. Examining the efficacy of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) on irrational beliefs and anxiety in elite youth cricketers. J Appl Sport Psychol2013; 25: 131–147.
6.
TurnerMJSlaterMJBarkerJB. The season-long effects of rational emotive behavior therapy on the irrational beliefs of professional academy soccer athletes. Int J Sport Psychol2015; 45: 429–451.
7.
EllisA. The biological basis of human irrationality. J Individ Psychol1976; 32: 145–168.
8.
DigiuseppeRADoyleCADrydenWet al.A practitioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
9.
KorzybskiA. Science and sanity: an introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics, New York: Institute of General Semantics, 1933.
10.
RuthWJ. Irrational thinking in humans: an evolutionary proposal for Ellis’ genetic postulate. J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther1992; 10: 3–20.
11.
SharfRS. Theories of psychotherapy and counseling: concepts and cases, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1996.
LazarusRS. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol1991; 46: 819–834.
14.
JonesMMeijenCMcCarthyPJet al.A theory of challenge and threat states in athletes. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2009; 2: 161–180.
15.
ChalabaevAMajorBCuryFet al.Physiological markers of challenge and threat mediate the effects of performance-based goals on performance. J Exp Soc Psychol2009; 45: 991–994.
16.
TurnerMJJonesMVSheffieldDet al.Who thrives under pressure? Predicting the performance of elite academy cricketers using the cardiovascular indicators of challenge and threat states. J Sport Exerc Psychol2013; 35: 387–397.
17.
McGregorHAElliotAJ. Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. J Educ Psychol2002; 94: 381–395.
AdieJWDudaJLNtoumanisN. Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the psychological and emotional welfare of sport participants. J Sport Exerc Psychol2008; 30: 302–322.
20.
FestingerL. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat1954; 7: 117–140.
21.
PearlinLISchoolerC. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav1978; 19: 2–21.
22.
CohenSMcKayGSocial support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: a theoretical analysis. In: BaumATaylorSESingerJE (eds). Handbook of psychology and health1984; Vol. 4, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 253–267.
23.
AspinwallLGTaylorSE. A stitch in time: self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychol Bull1997; 121: 417–436.
24.
TurnerMJJonesMVSheffieldDet al.Manipulating cardiovascular indices of challenge and threat using resource appraisals. Int J Psychophysiol2014; 94: 9–18.
25.
Vargas-TonsingTMShortSE. Athletes’ perceptions of psychological, emotional, and performance effects of coaches’ pre-game speeches. Int J Sports Sci Coach2011; 5: 27–43.
26.
Vargas-TonsingTMGuanJ. Athletes’ preferences for informational and emotional pre-game speech content. Int J Sports Sci Coach2007; 2: 171–180.
27.
Vargas-TonsingTM. An exploratory examination of the effects of coaches’ pre-game speeches on athletes’ perceptions of self-efficacy and emotion. J Sport Behav2009; 32: 92–111.
28.
Vargas-TonsingTMBartholomewJB. An exploratory study of the effects of pregame speeches on team efficacy beliefs. J Appl Soc Psychol2006; 36: 918–933.
29.
LindnerHKirkbyRWertheimEHet al.A brief assessment of irrational thinking: the Shortened General Attitude and Belief Scale. Cognit Ther Res1999; 23: 651–663.
30.
FergusonEMatthewsGCoxT. The appraisal of life events (ALE) scale: reliability and validity. Br J Health Psychol1999; 4: 97–116.
31.
ConroyDEElliotAJHoferSM. A 2 × 2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. J Appl Sport Psychol2003; 25: 456–476.
32.
Van SelstMVJolicoeurP. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Q J Exp Psychol1994; 47: 631–650.
33.
LeeDYHallbergETHaaseRF. Endorsement of Ellis’ irrational beliefs as a function of age. J Clin Psychol2006; 35: 754–756.
34.
EllisADrydenW. The practice of rational-emotive behavior therapy, New York: Springer, 1997.
35.
ZhuW. Sadly, the earth is still round (p < 0.05). J Sport Health Sci2012; 1: 9–11.
36.
FieldA. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th ed. London: Sage, 2013.
DeciELRyanRM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York: Plenum, 2006.
39.
TurnerMJ. Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), irrational and rational beliefs, and the mental health of athletes. Front Psychol2016; 7: 1–16.
40.
RyanRMConnellJP. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. J Pers Soc Psychol1989; 57: 749–761.
41.
StandageMDudaJLNtoumanisN. A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. Br J Educ Psychol2005; 75: 411–433.
42.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control, New York: Freeman, 1997.
43.
WeinbergRGroveRJacksonA. Strategies for building self-efficacy in tennis players: a comparative analysis of Australian and American coaches. Sport Psychol1992; 6: 3–13.
GoldbergGM. Irrational beliefs and three interpersonal styles. Psychol Rep1990; 66: 963–969.
46.
DrydenWBranchR. The fundamentals of rational emotive behaviour therapy: a training handbook, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
47.
DixonMTurnerMJGillmanJ. Examining the relationships between challenge and threat cognitive appraisals and coaching behaviours in football coaches. J Sports Sci2016; 35: 2446–2452.
48.
WoodAGBarkerJBTurnerMet al.Examining the effects of rational emotive behavior therapy on performance outcomes in elite paralympic athletes. Scan J Med Sci Sport2017; 28: 329–339.
49.
Turner MJ, Allen MS, Slater MJ, et al. The development and initial validation of the irrational performance beliefs inventory (iPBI). Eur J Psychol Assess. Epub ahead of print 22 April 2016. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000314.
