Within the present manuscript we explore the role of skin tone on playing position within English football’s top four professional leagues. Player data (n = 4515) was collected across five seasons (2010–2015). Unlike previous research, results indicate a statistically significant, but arguable minor difference between the skin tones of those who play in central as opposed to wide positions. However, a one-way ANOVA highlights significant differences between skin tone and individual playing positions. Between league differences were, however, non-significant. Although mean skin tone is still darker for peripheral (i.e., wide) positions, the situation is more nuanced than first thought. Instead of segregating players by central versus peripheral roles, it appears that players of a darker skin tone occupy positions associated with athleticism and strength. In contrast, players of a lighter skin tone appear to fulfil positions requiring organizational skills and creativity.
SmithELeonardWMII. Twenty-five years of stacking research in major league baseball: an attempt at explaining this re-occurring phenomenon. Sociol Focus1997; 30: 321–331.
2.
EntineJ. Taboo: Why Black athletes are better and why we're afraid to talk about it, New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2000.
3.
Harpalani V. Genetic, racial and cultural determinism in discourse on black athletes: a critique of Entine’s Taboo and Hoberman’s Darwin’s athletes. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA, 2004.
4.
LarsenH. Kenyan dominance in distance running. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol2003; 136: 161–170.
5.
FurleyPDicksM. “White men can't jump.” But can they throw? Social perception in European basketball. Scand J Med Sci Sports2014; 24: 857–867.
6.
RasmussenREsgateATurnerD. On your marks, get stereotyped, go!: novice coaches and black stereotypes in sprinting. J Sport Soc Issues2005; 29: 426–436.
7.
BuffingtonDFraleyT. Racetalk and sport: the color consciousness of contemporary discourse on basketball. Sociol Inq2011; 81: 333–352.
8.
EastmanTBillingsA. Biased voices of sports: racial and gender stereotyping in college basketball announcing. Howard J Commun2001; 12: 183–201.
9.
StoneJLynchCSjomelingMet al.Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. J Pers Soc Psychol1999; 77: 1213–1227.
10.
Finch I (Producer). Match of the Day [Television broadcast]. Salford, Manchester: British Broadcasting Corporation, 21 November 2016.
11.
FerrucciPTandocECJrPainterCEet al.A Black and White game: racial stereotypes in baseball. Howard J Commun2013; 24: 309–325.
12.
KochAJSackettPRD’MelloSD. A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. J Appl Psychol2015; 100: 128–161.
13.
LippmannW. Public opinion, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, 1922.
14.
SteeleC. A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol1997; 52: 613–629.
15.
SteeleCAronsonJ. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol1995; 69: 797–811.
16.
BeilockSRydellRMcConnellA. Stereotype threat and working memory: mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. J Exp Psychol2007; 136: 256–276.
17.
SchmaderTJohnsM. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. J Pers Soc Psychol2003; 85: 440–452.
18.
StoneJ. Battling doubt by avoiding practice: the effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in White athletes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull2002; 28: 1667–1678.
19.
AndersonE. The imperative of integration, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
20.
EitzenD. Fair and foul: beyond the myths and paradoxes of sport, 6th ed. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
21.
FerrucciPTandocECJr. Race and deep ball: applying stereotypes to NFL quarterbacks. Int J Sport Commun2017; 10: 41–57.
22.
CoakleyJ. Race and ethnicity in the sociology of sport in the United States, Colorado Springs: University of Colorado, 2010.
23.
MelnickM. Racial segregation by playing position in the English Football League: some preliminary observations. J Sport Soc Issues1988; 12: 122–130.
24.
NorrisJJonesR. Towards a clearer definition and application of the centrality hypothesis in English professional association football. J Sport Behav1998; 21: 181–196.
25.
PittsJYostD. Racial position segregation in intercollegiate football: do players become more racially segregated as they transition from high school to college?Rev Black Polit Econ2012; 40: 207–230.
26.
ThomasGGoodJGrossA. Racial athletic stereotype confirmation in college football recruiting. J Soc Psychol2015; 155: 238–254.
27.
HancockDJAdlerALCôtéJ. A proposed theoretical model to explain relative age effects in sport. Eur J Sport Sci2013; 13: 630–637.
28.
FazioROlsonM. Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annu Rev Psychol2003; 54: 297–327.
29.
FlorePCWichertsJM. Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. J Soc Psychol2015; 53I: 25–44.
30.
Dovidio JF, Hewstone M, Glick P, and Esses VM, Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination. London, UK: Sage; 2010; pp.3–28.
31.
Furley P and Memmert D. Coaches' implicit associations between size and giftedness: Implications for the relative age effect. J Sports Sci 2016; 34: 459–466.
32.
Rutherford A. A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived: The Stories in Our Genes. London, England: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2017.
