Judo contests are complex situations for coaches observing them. Identifying where judo coaches look (i.e. their visual search strategy) when observing contests can help identify visual information they may use to inform coaching decisions. The current exploratory study investigated the visual search strategies of elite, sub-elite, and non-judo coaches when observing the preparation phase (viewed from video footage) of elite-level judo contests. Participants' eye movements were recorded using a mobile eye-tracker. Participants were instructed to provide verbal coaching instructions to improve a specified judoka's (judo athlete) performance at set times during the footage. Elite coaches fixated significantly more frequently and longer on the specified judoka's upper body (p < 0.05) compared to the opponent's upper body and other key areas within the display. Sub-elite and non-judo coaches demonstrated no significant difference in the frequency or overall length of fixation between the judokas' upper bodies. The visual search strategy of elite judo coaches may have been a purposeful attempt to obtain accurate information about the judoka's attacking intentions early within the contest. This visual search strategy can be attributed to elite judokas' attempting to disguise their attacking intentions. Furthermore, elite coaches may have used the specified judoka's upper body as a visual pivot.
LahartIRobertsonPStrength and conditioning programme design for combat sports. In: DuncanMLyonsM (eds). Advances in strength and conditioning research, Hauppauge, NY: Nova, 2009, pp. 189–216.
2.
MiarkaBPanissaVLGJulioUFet al.A comparison of time-motion performance between age groups in judo matches. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 899–905.
3.
SantosLFernandez-RioJAlmansbaRet al.Perceptions of top-level judo coaches on training and performance. Int J Sports Sci Coach2015; 10: 145–158.
4.
Challis DG. A temporal analysis of the u48kg women's judo in the 2010 World Championships. In: 7th International Judo Federation World Judo Research Symposium, Paris, France, 22 August 2011.
5.
CalmetMMiarkaBFranchiniE. Modeling of grasps in judo contests. Int J Perform Anal Sport2010; 10: 229–240.
6.
MarconGFranchiniEJardimJRet al.Structural analysis of action and time in sports: judo. J Quant Anal Sport2011; 6: 10.
7.
MorenoFJSaavedraJMSabidoRet al.Visual search strategies of experienced and inexperienced swimming coaches. Percept Mot Skills2006; 103: 861–872.
8.
BakkerFCOudejansRRDBinschOet al.Penalty shooting and gaze behavior: unwanted effects of the wish not to miss. Int J Sports Psychol2006; 37: 265–280.
9.
HagemannNSchorerJCanal-BrulandRet al.Visual perception in fencing: do the eye movements of fencers represent their information pickup?Atten Percept Psychophys2010; 72: 2204–2214.
10.
MilazzoNFarrowDRuffaultAet al.Do karate fighters use situational probability information to improve decision-making performance during on-mat tasks?J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1547–1556.
11.
PirasALanzoniIMRaffiMet al.The within-task criterion to determine successful and unsuccessful table tennis players. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016; 11: 523–531.
12.
PirasALobiettiRSquatritoS. Response time, visual search strategy, and anticipatory skills in volleyball players. J Ophthamol2014; 4: 189268.
13.
PirasAPierantozziESquatritoS. Visual search strategy in judo fighters during the execution of the first grip. Int J Sports Sci Coach2014; 9: 185–197.
14.
PirasAVickersJN. The effect of fixation transitions on quiet eye duration and performance in the soccer penalty kick: instep versus inside kicks. Cogn Process2011; 12: 245–255.
15.
SavelsberghGJPWilliamsAMVan Der KampJet al.Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer players. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 279–287.
16.
VaeyansRLenoirMPhilippaertsRMet al.Mechanisms underpinning successful decision making in skilled youth soccer players: an analysis of visual search behaviors. J Motor Behav2007; 39: 395–408.
17.
VaeyansRLenoirMWilliamsAMet al.The effects of task constraints on visual search behavior and decision-making skill in youth soccer players. J Sport Exer Psychol2007; 29: 147–169.
18.
VickersJN. Visual control when aiming at a far target. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform1996; 22: 342–354.
19.
WilliamsAMDavidsKBurwitzLet al.Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced soccer players. Res Q Exerc Sport1994; 65: 127–135.
20.
WilliamsAMDavidsK. Visual search strategy, selective attention, and expertise in soccer. Res Q Exerc Sport1998; 69: 111–128.
21.
WilliamsAMElliotD. Anxiety, expertise, and visual search strategy in karate. J Sport Exer Psychol1999; 21: 362–375.
22.
CatteuwPGilisBWagemansJet al.Perceptual-cognitive skills in offside decision making: expertise and training effects. J Sport Exer Psychol2010; 32: 828–844.
23.
CatteeuwPHelsenWGilisBet al.Visual scan patterns and decision-making skills of expert assistant referees in offside situations. J Sport Exer Psychol2009; 31: 786–797.
24.
HancockDJSte-MarieDM. Gaze behaviors and decision making accuracy of higher- and lower-level ice hockey referees. Psychol Sport Exerc2013; 14: 66–71.
25.
SpitzJPutKWagemansJet al.Visual search behaviors of association football referees during assessment of foul play situations. Cog Res Princ Implic2016; 1: 12.
26.
DamasRSFerreiraAP. Pattern of visual search in basketball coaches. An analysis on the level of performance. Rev Psicol Deporte2013; 22: 199–204.
27.
GiblinGFarrowDReidMet al.Keep your eye off the ball: expertise differences in visual search behavior of tennis coaches. J Sport Exer Psychol2013; 35: S29.
28.
Moreno HernandezFJAvilaRFReina VailloRet al.Visual behaviour of tennis coaches in a court and video-based conditions. Rev Int Cienc Deporte2006; 5: 28–41.
29.
MorenoFJReinaRLuisVet al.Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced gymnastic coaches. Percept Mot Skills2002; 95: 901–902.
30.
PlessnerHHaarT. Sports performance judgements from a social cognitive perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc2006; 7: 555–575.
31.
RaabMHelsenWHow experts make decisions in dynamic, time-constrained sporting environments. In: BakerJFarrowD (eds). Routledge handbook of sport expertise, Oxon: Routledge, 2015, pp. 64–73.
32.
PirasARaffiMLanzoniIMet al.Microsaccdes and prediction of a motor outcome in a dynamic sport situation. Invest Ophthamol Vis Sci2015; 56: 4520–4530.
VickersJN. Perception, cognition, and decision training: the quiet eye in action, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007.
35.
VineSJMooreLJWilsonMR. Quiet eye training facilitates competitive putting performance in elite golfers. Front Psychol2011; 2: 8.
36.
FranchiniEArtioliGGBritoCJ. Judo combat: time-motion analysis and physiology. International J Perform Anal Sport2013; 13: 624–641.
37.
International Judo Federation. Refereeing rules of the international judo federation: 2014 – 2016.
38.
MiarkaBDel VecchioFBJulianettiRet al.Time-motion and tactical analysis of Olympic judo fighters. Int J Perform Anal Sport2016; 16: 133–142.
39.
NorthJSWilliamsAMHodgesNet al.Perceiving patterns in dynamic action sequences: investigating the processes underpinning stimulus recognition and anticipation skill. Appl Cogn Psychol2009; 23: 878–894.
40.
Collins N and Challis DG. An analysis of kumi kata at the Junior and Senior British Championships 2013. In: 8th International Judo Federation World Judo Research Symposium, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 25 August 2013.
VansteenkistePVan HammeDVeelaertPet al.Cycling around a curve: the effect of cycling speed on gaze behavior. PLoS One2014; 9: e102792.
43.
AfonsoJGargantaJMcrobertAet al.The perceptual cognitive processes underpinning skilled performance in volleyball: Evidence from eye-movements and verbal reports of thinking involving an in situ representative task. J Sports Sci Med2012; 11: 339–345.
44.
Pierantozzi E, Nerozzi E, Piras A, et al. Analysis of the fighting phase before the first grip in the finals of the Judo World Championship 2007. In: Annals of the 1st European judo federation scientific congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 10 April 2009.
45.
MacInnesWJHuntARHilcheyMDet al.Driving forces in free visual search: an ethology. Atten Percept Psychophys2014; 76: 280–295.
46.
WolfeJMHorowitzTS. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?Nat Rev Neurosci2004; 5: 495–50.
47.
GeyerTMullerHJKrummenacherJ. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons. Vision Res2008; 48: 1315–1326.
48.
DowdEWMitroffSR. Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform2013; 39: 1786–1796.
49.
BirminghamEBischofWFKingstoneA. Gaze selection in complex social scenes. Vis Cogn2008; 16: 341–355.
50.
BirminghamEBischofWFKingstoneA. Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes. Vision Res2009; 49: 2992–3000.
51.
ItierRJBattyM. Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2009; 33: 843–863.
52.
HarrisLJ. In fencing, what gives left-handers the edge? Views from the present and the distant past. Laterality2010; 15: 15–55.
53.
LoffingFSolterFHagemannN. Left preference for sport tasks does not necessarily indicate left-handedness: sport-specific lateral preferences, relationship with handedness and implications for laterality research in behavioural sciences. PLoS One2014; 9: e105800.
54.
TirpJBakerJWeigeltMet al.Combat stance in judo – laterality differences between and within competition levels. Int J Perform Anal Sport2014; 14: 217–224.
55.
MikheevMMohrCAfanasievSet al.Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers. Neuropsychologia2002; 40: 1209–1219.
