With the abundance of literature focusing on parental influence in sport, it is important to identify family dynamics that extend beyond parents to include siblings. In this study, sibling influence was explored through retrospective interviews with former elite youth female athletes (N = 4) and their sibling (n = 4) of the same sex who participated in the same sport. The purpose was to discover how siblings influence high performance sport participation. Two categories emerged from the data: positive experiences participating in the same sport (e.g. growth of relationship, development of understanding) and negative experiences participating in the same sport (e.g. sibling competition, emotional response). The participants’ descriptions coincide with observational learning and both deidentification and divergence processes. The data adds to the probable sibling experiences proposed in the Developmental Model of Sport Participation and provides insight on managing sibling relations in sport. Implications and practical applications of these findings are discussed.
Statistics Canada. General social survey, Ottawa: Minister of Industry, 2010.
2.
Fraser-ThomasJCôtéJDeakinJ. Understanding dropout and prolonged engagement in adolescent competitive sport. Psychol Sport Exerc2008; 9: 645–662.
3.
CôtéJFraser-ThomasJYouth involvement and positive development in sport. In: CrockerP (ed). Sport psychology: a Canadian perspective, 2nd ed. Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2011, pp. 226–255.
4.
HoltNLTamminenKABlackDE. Youth sport parenting styles and practices. Psychol Sport Exerc2009; 31: 37–59.
5.
BrodyGH. Sibling relationship quality: its causes and consequences. Annu Rev Psychol1998; 49: 1–24.
6.
Fraser-ThomasJStrachanLJeffery-TosoniSFamily influence on children’s involvement in sport. In: CôtéJLidorR (eds). Conditions of children’s talent development in sport, Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, 2013, pp. 179–196.
7.
CôtéJ. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol1999; 13: 395–417.
8.
DavisNWMeyerBB. When sibling becomes competitor: a qualitative investigation of same-ex sibling competition in elite sport. J Appl Sport Psychol2008; 20: 220–235.
9.
WoldBAnderssenN. Health promotion aspects of family and peer influences on sport participation. Int J Sport Psychol1992; 23: 343–359.
10.
SullowayFJ. Born to rebel: birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives, New York: Pantheon Books, 1996.
11.
CôtéJHayJChildren’s involvement in sport: a developmental perspective. In: SilvaJMStevensDE (eds). Psychological foundations of sport, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2002, pp. 484–502.
12.
LarsonRRichardsMH. Divergent realities: the emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents, New York: Basic Books, 1994.
13.
McHaleSMCrouterACThe family contexts of children’s sibling relationships. In: BrodyG (ed). Sibling relationships: their causes and consequences, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1996, pp. 173–195.
14.
MischelWA social learning view of sex differences in behavior. In: MaccobyE (ed). The development of sex differences, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1966, pp. 57–81.
15.
WhitemanSDMcHaleSMCrouterAC. Competing processes of sibling influence: observational learning and sibling deidentification. Soc Dev2007; 16: 642–661.
16.
AnsbacherHLAnsbacherRR. The individual psychology of Alfred Adler, New York: Basic Books, 1956.
17.
SchachterFFGilutzGShoreE. Sibling deidentification judged by mothers: cross validation and developmental studies. Child Dev1978; 49: 543–546.
18.
SchachterFFShoreEFeldman-RotmanS. Sibling deidentification. Dev Psychol1976; 12: 418–427.
19.
DarwinCR. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, London: John Murray, 1859.
BloomBS. Developing talent in young people, New York: Ballantine Books, 1985.
22.
CreswellJ. Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
23.
CôtéJEricssonKALawMP. Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: a proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. J Appl Sport Psychol2005; 17: 1–19.
24.
EricssonKASimonHA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.
25.
LawMPCôtéJEricssonKA. Characteristics of expert development in rhythmic gymnastics: a retrospective study. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2007; 5: 82–103.
26.
PattonM. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2002.
27.
SeidmanI. Interviewing as qualitative research, New York: Teachers College Press, 1991.
28.
BraunVClarkeV. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners, London: Sage Publications, Inc., 2013.
29.
TeschR. Qualitative research analysis types and software tools, New York: Falmer Press, 1990.
30.
DenzinNKLincolnYS. Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
31.
GubaEGLincolnYS. Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
FurmanWBuhrmesterD. Children’s perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships. Child Dev1985; 56: 448–461.
36.
WeissRSThe provisions of social relationships. In: RubinZ (ed). Doing unto others, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
37.
WeissRSMaterials for theory of social relationships. In: BennisWGScheinEHSteeleFE (eds). Interpersonal dynamics: essays and readings on human interaction, Homewood, IL: Dorsey, 1968, pp. 154–163.
38.
AzmitiaMHesserJ. Why siblings are important agents of cognitive development: a comparison of siblings and peers. Child Dev1993; 64: 430–444.
39.
FurmanWBuhrmesterD. Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Dev Psychol1985; 21: 1016–1024.
40.
BuhrmesterDFurmanW. Perceptions of sibling relationships during middle childhood and adolescence. Child Dev1990; 61: 1387–1398.
41.
BanduraA. Social learning theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
42.
BrownWLWilsonEO. Character displacement. Syst Zool1956; 5: 49–64.
43.
SullowayFWhy siblings are like Darwin’s finches: birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In: BussDMHawleyPH (eds). The evolution of personality and individual differences, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 86–119.
