There is a lack of clarity in the sports coaching literature about philosophical pragmatism, but the work of Classical Pragmatists such as C.S. Peirce, William James and John Dewey is worthy of attention by both practitioners and researchers. This stimulus article is divided into four sections: Pragmatic Temperament, which includes a discussion of how English Premier League soccer manager Arsène Wenger might be regarded as pragmatic; Communities of Inquiry, which makes reference to a philosophy group at English Premiership rugby union club Saracens; Mixed Methods Research, which examines the use of abduction, deduction and induction in research; and Reflection, which shows how Schön’s reflective practice is a reworking of Dewey’s theory of inquiry.
NelsonLJGroomR. The analysis of athletic performance: some practical and philosophical considerations. Sport Educ Soc2012; 17: 687–701.
4.
GrantAMPast, present and future: the evolution of professional coaching and coaching psychology. In: PalmerSWhybrowA (eds). Handbook of coaching psychology, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 23–39.
5.
HuberJ. Educational psychology in coaching athletes, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2013.
6.
PappasGF. The narrative and identity of pragmatism in America: the history of a dysfunctional family?Pluralist2014; 9: 65–83.
7.
StoutJ. The spirit of pragmatism: Bernstein’s variations on Hegelian themes. Graduate Facul Philos J2012; 33: 185–246.
8.
KloppenbergJT. Pragmatism: an old name for some new ways of thinking?J Am His1996; 83: 100–138.
9.
WestbrookRThe making of a democratic philosopher: the intellectual development of John Dewey. In: CochranM (ed). The Cambridge companion to Dewey, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 13–33.
10.
PrawatRS. The two faces of Deweyan pragmatism: inductionism versus social constructivism. Teachers College Record2000; 102: 805–840.
11.
RodgersC. Defining reflection: another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record2002; 104: 842–866.
12.
DeweyJ. Democracy and education, New York, NY: Free Press, 1944/1916.
MartelaFPragmatism as an attitude. In: ZackariassonU (ed). Action, belief and inquiry—pragmatist perspectives on science, society and religion. Nordic studies in pragmatism 3, Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, 2015, pp. 187–207.
15.
DeweyJ. What does pragmatism mean by practical?J Philos Psychol Scient Meth1908; 5: 85–99.
16.
JamesW. Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking, New York, NY: Prometheus Books, 1991.
17.
NicholsonCEducation and the pragmatic temperament. In: MalachowskiA (ed). The Cambridge companion to pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 249–271.
HardmanARJonesCREthics for coaches. In: JonesRLHughesMKingstonK (eds). An introduction for sports coaching: connecting theory to practice, London: Routledge, 2013, pp. 113–130.
24.
GoldingC. The community of inquiry: blending philosophical and empirical research. Stud Philos Educ2015; 34: 205–216.
25.
DenisonJ. Social theory for coaches: a Foucauldian reading of one athlete’s poor performance. Int J Sports Sci Coach2007; 2: 369–383.
26.
PardalesMJGirodM. Community of Inquiry: its past and present future. Educ Philos Theor2006; 38: 299–309.
27.
Peirce CS. The philosophical writings of Peirce. Buchler J (ed.). New York, NY: Dover, 1955.
28.
LipmanM. Philosophy goes to school, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1988.
PotracPJonesRArmourK. ‘It’s all about getting respect’: the coaching behaviors of an expert English soccer coach. Sport Educ Soc2002; 7: 183–202.
32.
SmithMCushionCJ. An investigation of the in-game behaviours of professional, top-level youth soccer coaches. J Sports Sci2006; 24: 355–366.
33.
TeschR. Qualitative research analysis types and software tools, New York, NY: Falmer Press, 1990.
34.
MorganDL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological Implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mixed Meth Res2007; 1: 48.
35.
PlutynskiA. Four problems of abduction: a brief history. HOPOS: J Int Soc His Philos Sci2011; 1: 227–248.
36.
Belluci F and Pietarinen A-V. Charles Sanders Peirce Logic. International Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/peir-log/ (accessed 7 December 2016).
37.
PeirceCS. Deduction, induction and hypotheses. Popular Science Monthly1878; 13: 470–482.
38.
PeirceCS. WiessPHartshorneCBurkeAW. 1932–1958 Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 1974; Vols. 1–8, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
PopperK. The logic of scientific discovery, New York, NY: Harper Row, 1968.
42.
HaigBD. An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychol Meth2005; 10: 371–388.
43.
ThagardP. Computational philosophy of science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.
44.
HarréRThe constructive role of models. In: CollinsL (ed). The use of models in the social sciences, London, UK: Tavistock, 1976, pp. 16–43.
45.
HesseMB. Models and analogies in science, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.
46.
LiptonP. Inference to the best explanation, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2004.
47.
VertueFMHaigBD. An abductive perspective on clinical reasoning and case formulation. J Clin Psychol2008; 64: 1046–1068.
48.
ThagardP. Conceptual revolutions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.
49.
CharmazKShifting the grounds: constructivist grounded theory methods. In: MorseJMSternPNCorbinJBowersBCharmazKClarkeA (eds). Developing grounded theory: the second generation, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2009, pp. 127–155.
50.
GlaserBGStraussAL. The discovery of grounded theory, New York, NY: Aldine, 1967.
51.
TimmermansSTavoryI. Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol Theor2012; 30: 167–186.
SparkesACSmithB. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: from process to product, London: Routledge, 2014.
54.
StanleyDECamposDG. The logic of medical diagnosis. Perspect Biol Med2013; 56: 300–315.
55.
SchleiferRVannattaJ. The logic of diagnosis: Peirce, literary narrative, and the history of present illness. J Med Philos2006; 31: 363–384.
56.
JenkinsS. The impact of John Jacobs on golf coaching. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009; S1: 1–9.
57.
JenkinsS. The impact of John Jacobs on golf coaching: a response to commentaries. Int J Sport Sci Coach2009; S1: 55–65.
58.
FendlerL. Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: historical influences and political reverberations. Educ Research2003; 32: 16–25.
59.
SchönD. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, New York, NY: Basic Books, 1987.
60.
ZeichnerKMTabachnickBRReflections on reflective teaching. In: TabachnickBRZeichnerKM (eds). Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education, New York, NY: Falmer, 1991, pp. 1–21.
61.
KinsellaEA. Technical rationality in Schön’s reflective practice: dichotomous or non-dualistic epistemological position. Nurs Philos2007; 8: 102–113.
62.
ErautM. Schön shock: a case for reframing reflection-in-action. Teacher Teach: Theory Pract1995; 1: 9–22.
63.
NadlerSM. Arnauld and the Cartesian philosophy of ideas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.
64.
van ManenM. The tact of teaching: the meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness, New York, NY: State University of New York Press, 1991.
