The effects of induced variability in the improvement on shot at goal in soccer were examined. The hypothesis tested was that induced variability would be more beneficial for performance than repetition practice; 20 young soccer players (N = 20) trained with induced variability, and 21 (N = 21) trained with repetition method. Accuracy and ball speed were analyzed in three moments: pre-test, post-test carried out after 10 training sessions and re-test, applied at short term (one week). The induced variability group improved the accuracy on post-test (p = 0.005) and re-test (p = 0.0001). The repetition training group improved the accuracy on re-test (p = 0.0001). The ball speed increased in both groups on post-test and re-test (p = 0.0001). The induced variability improves the accuracy of the kicks at end of training, and short term after periods without practice. The repetition practice is effective to perform after no practice time only. The practice in both conditions leads to an increase in the ball speed at end of training as after periods without practice.
GentileA. A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest1972; 17: 3–23.
2.
WagnerHMüllerE. The effects of differential and variable training on the quality parameters of a handball throw. Sports Biomech2008; 7: 54–71.
3.
MadeleineP. On functional motor adaptations: from the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck–shoulder region. Acta Physiol2010; 199(Suppl. 679): 1–46.
4.
SchmidtRA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev1975; 82: 225–260.
5.
HarbourneRTStergiouN. Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tools: Principles to guide physical therapist practice. Phys Ther2009; 89: 267–282.
6.
NewellKMMcDonaldPVSearching for solutions to the coordination function: learning as exploratory behavior. In: StelmachGERequinJ (eds). Tutorials in motor behavior II, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992, pp. 517–532.
7.
RanganathanRNewellK. Changing up the routine: intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exercise Sport Sci R2013; 41: 64–70.
8.
NewellKMConstraints on the development of coordination. In: WadeMGWhitingHT (eds). Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986, pp. 341–360.
9.
DavidsKButtonCBennettS. Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008.
10.
TurveyMT. Coordination. Am Psychol1990; 45: 938–953.
11.
ChowJYDavidsKButtonC. Nonlinear pedagogy: a constraints-led framework for understanding emergence of game play and movement skills. Nonlin Dyn Psychol Life Sci2006; 10: 71–103.
12.
ChowJYDavidsKRenshawIThe acquisition of movement skill in children through nonlinear pedagogy. In: CoteJLidorE (eds). Conditions of children's talent development in sport, Morgantown: Fitness Information Technology WV, 2013, pp. 41–59.
13.
LeeMCYChowJYKomarJ. Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PLoS One2014; 9: e104744.
14.
SchöllhornWIHegenPDavidsK. The nonlinear nature of learning – a differential learning approach. Open Sports Sci J2012; 5(Suppl 1-M11): 100–112.
15.
SchöllhornWIBechmanHDavidsK. Exploiting system fluctuations. Differential training in physical prevention and rehabilitation programs for health and exercise. Medicine2010; 46: 365–373.
16.
SchöllhornWIBeckmannHJanssenDStochastic perturbations in athletics field events enhance skill acquisition. In: RenshawIDavidsKSavelsberghGJP (eds). Motor learning in practice: a constraints-led approach, USA: Routledge, 2010, pp. 69–82.
17.
Trockel M and Schöllhorn WI. Differential learning in soccer (Abstract). In: Proceedings of 1st European workshop on movement science (eds Schöllhorn WI, Bohn C, Jäger JM, et al.), 2003, p.64. Köln, Germany: Sport & Buch Straub.
18.
Spratte M, Janssen D and Schöllhorn WI. Recognition of jumping patterns in volleyball after traditional and differential strength training by means of artificial neural nets (Abstract). In: Proceedings of 3rd European workshop on movement science (eds Schöllhorn WI, Bohn C and Jäger JM), 2007, pp.167–168. Köln, Germany: Sportverlag Straub.
19.
SavelsberghGJPKamperWJRabiusJ. A new method to learn to start in speed skating: a differential learning approach. Int J Sport Psychol2010; 41: 415–427.
20.
SheaCHLaiQWrightDL. Consistent and variable practice conditions: effects on relative and absolute timing. J Motor Behav2001; 33: 139–152.
21.
MenayoREncarnaciónAGeaGM. Sample entropy-based analysis of differential and traditional training effects on dynamic balance in healthy people. J Motor Behav2014; 46: 73–82.
22.
Van Den TillarREttemaG. Instructions emphasizing, velocity, accuracy, or both in performance and kinematics of overarm throwing by experienced team handball players. Percept Motor Skill2003; 97: 731–742.
23.
HernándezHUrbánTSarabiaJM. Variable training: effects on velocity and accuracy in the tennis serve. Jo Sport Sci2014; 32: 1383–1388.
24.
MorenoFJReinaRLuisV. Development of a technological system to record the behavior of tennis players and tennis wheelchair in reaction response situations. Eur J Hum Mov2003; 10: 165–190.
25.
Beckman H and Schölhorn W. Differential learning in shot put (abstract). In: Proceedings of 1st European workshop on movement science (eds Schöllhorn WI, Bohn C, Jäger JM, et al.), 2003, pp.68–69. Köln, Germany: Sport & Buch Straub.
26.
Römer J, Schöllhorn WI, Jaitner T, et al. Differenzielles lernenbei der aufschlagannahmeim volleyball. In: Messplätze, Messplatztraining, Motorisches Lernen (eds Krug J and Müller T), 2003, pp.129–133. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
27.
SchöllhornWMichelbrinkMWelminskiDIncreasing stochastic perturbations enhance skill acquisition and learning of complex sport movements. In: AraujoDRipollHRaabM (eds). Perspectives on cognition and action in sport, Hauppauge: Nova Science, 2009, pp. 59–73.
28.
LaiQSheaCHWulfG. Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Rese Q Exercise Sport2000; 1: 10–24.
29.
WulfGSheaCH. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychon B Rev2002; 9: 185–211.
30.
TaïanaFGrehaigneJComettiGThe influence of maximal strength training of lower limbs of soccer players on their physical and kick performances. In: ReillyTClarysJStibbeA (eds). Science and Football Vol. II, London: E & F.N. Spon, 1993, pp. 98–103.
31.
TrolleMAagaardPSimonsenJEffects of strength training on kicking performance in soccer. In: ReillyTClarysJStibbeA (eds). Science and football Vol. II, London: E & F.N. Spon, 1993, pp. 95–98.
32.
Schölhorn WI, Röber F, Jaitner T, et al. Discrete and continuous effects of traditional and differential sprint training. In: Proceedings of 6th ECSS congress (eds Mesters J, King G, Strüder H, et al.), Cologne, Germany, 24–28 July 2001, p.311.
33.
Schönherr T and Schöllhorn WI. Differential learning in basketball (Abstract). In: Proceedings of 1st European workshop on movement science (eds Schöllhorn WI, Bohn C and Jäger JM), 2003, pp.58–59. Köln, Germany: Sport & Buch Straub.
34.
GarcíaJAMenayoRSánchezJ. Effects of variable practice on long distance shot at goal in football. Int J Med Sci Phys Act Sport2015; 15: 663–675.
