The aim was to examine how skiers control skiing speed using V2-skating. Subjects skied with three submaximal and maximal speeds on 100 m 4° uphill. Cycle variables and force parameters form the arms and legs were analysed. Cycle rate increased up to the maximum speed. Cycle length increased from the slowest speed to the all other speeds. Pole force and delta leg force increased up to the maximum speed. Ranges of motions and angular velocities of kick flexion and extension with knee and hip joints increased till highest submaximal speed. Speed was regulated with cycle length and rate while the latter was dominant after ∼5.0 m/s. Higher speed was reached with higher forces from arms and legs while legs were emphasized with faster speeds. Higher forces were partly generated with greater vertical movement of the body, which might have elicited stretch-shortening cycle type of movement leading to greater force output.
StögglTStögglJMüllerECompetition analysis of the last decade (1996–2008) in cross-country skiing. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). 4th International Congress on Skiing and Science, Oxford, Austria: Meyer & Meyer Sport, St. Anton am Arlberg, 2008, pp. 657–677.
2.
BerghUForsbergACross-country ski racing. In: ShephardRJÅstrasndP-O (eds). Endurance in Sport, Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd., 2000, pp. 844–856.
3.
Smith GA. Biomechanics of cross country skiing. In: Rusko H (ed) Cross country skiing. Blackwell Science Ltd., 2003, pp.32–61.
4.
AnderssonESupejMSandbakkO. Analysis of sprint cross-country skiing using a differential global navigation satellite system. Eur J Appl Physiol2010; 110: 585–595.
5.
HayJG. Cycle rate, length, and speed of progression in human locomotion. J Appl Biomech2002; 18: 257–270.
6.
LosnegardTMyklebustHHallénJ. No differences in O2-Cost between V1 and V2 skating techniques during treadmill roller skiing at moderate to steep inclines. J Strength Cond Res2012; 26: 1340–1347.
7.
NilssonJTveitPEikrehagenO. Effects of speed on temporal patterns in classical style and freestyle cross-country skiing. Sports Biomech2004; 3: 85–107.
8.
PerreySMilletGYCandauR. Stretch-shortening cycle in roller ski skating: effects of technique. Int J Sports Med1998; 19: 513–520.
9.
MilletGYHoffmanMDCandauRB. Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of technique and speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc1998; 30: 1645–1653.
10.
Hoffman MD, Clifford PS and Bender F. Effect of velocity on cycle rate and length for three roller skiing techniques. J Appl Biomech 1995: 257–266.
11.
SmithGKvammeBJakobsenVSki skating technique choice: mechanical and physiological factors affecting performance. In: SchwamederHStrutzenbergerGFastenbauerV (eds). Xxiv international symposium on biomechanics in sports, Salzburg, Austria: Department of Sport Sciences and Kinesiology, University of Salzburg, 2006, pp. 397–400.
12.
SandbakkOEttemaGHolmbergHC. The influence of incline and speed on work rate, gross efficiency and kinematics of roller ski skating. Eur J Appl Physiol2012; 112: 2829–2838.
13.
SandbakkOHolmbergHCLeirdalS. Metabolic rate and gross efficiency at high work rates in world class and national level sprint skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol2010; 109: 473–481.
14.
SandbakkOLeirdalSEttemaG. The physiological and biomechanical differences between double poling and G3 skating in world class cross-country skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol2015; 115: 483–487.
15.
GopfertCHolmbergHCStogglT. Biomechanical characteristics and speed adaptation during kick double poling on roller skis in elite cross-country skiers. Sports Biomech2013; 12: 154–174.
16.
LindingerSJHolmbergHCMullerE. Changes in upper body muscle activity with increasing double poling velocities in elite cross-country skiing. Eur J Appl Physiol2009; 106: 353–363.
17.
LindingerSJStogglTMullerE. Control of speed during the double poling technique performed by elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41: 210–220.
18.
VahasoyrinkiPKomiPVSeppalaS. Effect of skiing speed on ski and pole forces in cross-country skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc2008; 40: 1111–1116.
19.
StögglTMüllerE. Kinematic determinants and physiological response of cross-country skiing at maximal speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41: 1476–1487.
20.
KvammeBJakobsenVHetlandS. Ski skating technique and physiological responses across slopes and speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol2005; 95: 205–212.
21.
HolmbergHCLindingerSStogglT. Biomechanical analysis of double poling in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc2005; 37: 807–818.
22.
LindingerSJGopfertCStogglT. Biomechanical pole and leg characteristics during uphill diagonal roller skiing. Sports Biomech2009; 8: 318–333.
23.
StögglTMüllerEHolmbergH-CCenter of mass movement in cross-country skiing – a waste of energy or the prerequisite to ski fast. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). 5th international congress on science and skiing, Austria: Department of Sport Sciences and Kinesiology, University of Salzburg, St. Christoph/Arlberg, 2010, pp. 43.
24.
MyklebustHLosnegardTHallenJ. Differences in V1 and V2 ski skating techniques described by accelerometers. Scand J Med Sci Sports2013; 24: 882–893.
25.
OhtonenOLindingerSLinnamoV. Effects of gliding properties of cross-country skis on the force production during skating technique in elite cross-country skiers. Int J Sports Sci Coach2013; 8: 407–416.
26.
LinnamoVOhtonenOStögglTMulti-dimensional force measurement binding used during skating in cross-country skiing. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). Science and skiing V, Oxford, UK: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2012, pp. 540–548.
27.
LinnamoVKolehmainenVVähäsöyrinkiPSimulation of classical skiing using a new ski tester. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). Science and skiing IV, Oxford, UK: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2009, pp. 615–620.
28.
StogglTKampelWMullerE. Double-push skating versus V2 and V1 skating on uphill terrain in cross-country skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc2010; 42: 187–196.
29.
StogglTMullerELindingerS. Biomechanical comparison of the double-push technique and the conventional skate skiing technique in cross-country sprint skiing. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 1225–1233.
30.
StögglTEnqvistJMüllerE. Relationships between body composition, body dimensions, and peak speed in cross-country sprint skiing. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 161–169.
31.
HunterJPMarshallRNMcNairPJ. Interaction of step length and step rate during sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc2004; 36: 261–271.
32.
SmithGA. Biomechanical analysis of cross-country skiing techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc1992; 24: 1015–1022.
33.
StögglTMüllerEAinegrenM. General strength and kinetics: fundamental to sprinting faster in cross country skiing?Scand J Med Sci Sports2011; 21: 791–803.
34.
KomiPV. Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. J Biomech2000; 33: 1197–1206.
35.
AvelaJFinniJKomiPV. Excitability of the soleus reflex arc during intensive stretch-shortening cycle exercise in two power-trained athlete groups. Eur J Appl Physiol2006; 97: 486–493.
36.
KyröläinenHAvelaJKomiPV. Changes in muscle activity with increasing running speed. J Sports Sci2005; 23: 1101–1109.
37.
KomiPIshikawaMLinnamoVSsc function during X-C skiing. In: HakkarainenALinnamoVLindingerS (eds). Science and nordic skiing II – Congress proceedings – 2nd international congress on science and nordic skiing (ICSNS 2012), Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, 2013, pp. 59–71.
38.
KomiPVNormanRW. Preloading of the thrust phase in cross-country skiing. Int J Sports Med1987; 8(Suppl): 148–154.
39.
Lindinger SJ, Ishikawa M, Komi P, et al. Identification of fascicle-tendon interaction during Ssc in skiing techniques. In: Meeusen R, Duchateau J, Roelands B, et al. (eds) 17th annual congress of the european college of sport science. Bruges, Belgium, 2012, pp.515–516.
40.
LindingerS. Biomechanische Analysen Von Skatingtechniken Im Skilanglauf/Kinetic and Kinematic Analyses of Modern Skating and Imitation Techniques in Cross-Country Ski Racing – Basis for technique training, specific conditions training and development of cross-country skiing equipment, Aachen, Germany: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2005.
41.
MargariaR. Positive and negative work performances and their efficiencies in human locomotion. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Physiologie Einschliesslich Arbeitsphysiologie1968; 25: 339–351.
42.
HolmbergHCLindingerSStogglT. Contribution of the legs to double-poling performance in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc2006; 38: 1853–1860.
