Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Binary transition metal oxides exhibit improved properties including good redox potentials and electrical conductivities compared with single metal oxides as electrode materials in energy storage. Herein, ZIF-67 is prepared by a one-step method using Co²⁺ as the central metal ion, 2-methylimidazole as the organic ligand, and methanol as an organic solvent at room temperature. Hollow NiCo₂O₄ and sheet-like Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ derived from bimetallic imidazolate framework precursors were synthesized by adding cobalt and nickel ions in appropriate proportions. A hollow and porous structure is achieved for the reaction between a nickel salt and ZIF-67, and this unique nanostructure provides a high active surface area, which is beneficial to the electrochemical properties. Several samples are prepared and used as electrode materials for electrochemical tests in 6 M KOH. As a result, the Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ electrode with a sheet nanostructure showed a high specific capacitance of 846 F g⁻¹ at a current density of 0.5 A g⁻¹. This Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ electrode material is promising for future studies on high-performance supercapacitors to solve emerging energy-related problems.

Keywords

electrode materials nanosheets supercapacitors ZIF-67

Introduction

Compared with traditional batteries, supercapacitors exhibiting excellent power density, fast charging and discharging performance, long cycle stabilities, and environmental friendliness are considered to be very promising for energy storage.^1,2 Although supercapacitors can provide significantly higher power than traditional batteries of the same volume, the small energy density of supercapacitors limits their practical applications.^3,4 To resolve this problem, it is necessary to research hybrid supercapacitors based on both the energy storage mechanisms of chemical batteries and supercapacitors.⁵

Transition metal oxides and conductive polymers are typical electrode materials in hybrid supercapacitors. In particular, transition metal oxides are more widely used due to their high stabilities and different valence states.^6,7 However, for single metal oxides, the limited electron transport between the electrode materials and the electrolyte hinders its electrochemical performance. Classical binary metal oxides such as NiCo₂O₄,⁸ ZnCo₂O₄,⁹ and NiFe₂O₄¹⁰ have attracted attention because of their numerous active sites that promote the redox reactions of electrode materials, making them suitable candidates for flexible electrode materials.¹¹ In previous reports, NiCo₂O₄ complexes with various morphologies have been synthesized, such as nanosheets, nanoneedles, and yolk-shell nanostructures. Xu et al.¹² synthesized hierarchical Co₃O₄@NiCo₂O₄ core-shell nanosheets as supercapacitors, which showed excellent rate capability and compelling cycling performance. Researchers synthesized a needle-like Ni-Co precursor on Ni foam by using the hydrothermal method and then obtained Ni foam@NiCo₂O₄ after an annealing process. Besides, carbon nanotubes aerogels are coated on the surface of Ni foam@NiCo₂O₄ by utilizing van der Waals and viscous forces and exhibit a high specific capacitance at 20 A g⁻¹.¹³ To achieve electrode materials with abundant adsorption sites, the common way is to expand organic linkers resulting in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with ultrahigh porosity.¹⁴ However, expanded metal links can also cause fragile frameworks and penetration between different lattices, precluding high porosity.^14,15

MOFs can be used as support substrates for nanomaterials or as sacrificial templates/precursors for the generation of various nanostructures.¹⁶ MOFs are coordinated supramolecular materials, composed of coordinated metal ions, nodes, and organic ligands.¹⁷ Because of their large specific surface areas and abundant oxidation-active sites, they have attracted widespread attention in the field of electrochemical energy storage.^18,19 MOFs, especially ZIF-67, are a type of promising porous carbon product that can be used as electrode materials in EDLCs (electrochemical double-layer capacitors).¹ ZIF-67 (a Co-based zeolitic imidazolate framework), with a cubic crystal nanostructure, can be prepared with a metal cobalt ion as the central atom and 2-methylimidazole as the organic ligand under appropriate external conditions.²⁰ Sundriyal et al.²¹ prepared nickel- doped ZIF-67 in the presence of rGO, and finally ZIF-67/rGO generated a composition as an electrode, the specific capacitance of which was 304 F g⁻¹ at a current density of 1 A g⁻¹. Bimetallic metal oxide materials derived from MOFs possess high stability and conductivity, which provides more active sites and makes them ideal supercapacitor materials.¹⁰

The bimetallic mixture derived from an MOF has a more complex structure because metal ions with different functions are concentrated in a MOF framework, and the first type of metal ion may be replaced by the second type leading to provide new functions, which depend on the new metal ion.²² In addition, other researchers found that a polyhedron with a hollow structure could be synthesized by selenizing the precursors of Ni- Co bimetallic hydroxides that were derived from ZIF-67, with the generated material showing high specific capacitance and excellent high energy density as a supercapacitor.²³ This electrode material based on an MOF has a unique structure that can greatly shorten charge transport paths to improve the electron transport and diffusion, thus strengthening the catalytic performance of the electrode materials.¹⁹

Inspired by these results, it is of value to develop a facile and effective method to construct materials with high conductivity based on MOFs. In this study, a simple template-assisted method has been employed with ZIF-67 as the precursor, adding cobalt and nickel ions in the appropriate proportions to synthesize products with interesting nanostructures based on coordinating etching and precipitating processes. The combination of ZIF-67 and binary metal oxides shows synergistic effects for capacitance with enhanced performance, such as higher capacitance (846 F g⁻¹) with respect to single ZIF-67 or NiCo₂O₄.

Results and discussion

The procedure for fabricating ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ is presented in Figure 1, showing the formation of NiCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ based on ZIF-67 through the template-assisted method. Figure 2(a) shows the crystalline phases of ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ precursors according to X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. It shows that NiCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ before annealing keep the traces of ZIF-67. From Figure 2(b), the XRD pattern types are in agreement with the crystal planes of (110), (111), (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440), respectively, of NiCo₂O₄ (JCPDS 73-1702) and Co₃O₄ (JCPDS 80-1535). For ZIF-67, the peaks at 7.4°, 10.4°, 12.7°, 14.7°, 16.4°, 18.0°, 22.1°, 24.5°, 25.5°, 26.6°, 29.6°, 30.5°, 31.4°, and 32.3° are unambiguously assigned to the reported patterns of crystalline ZIF-67.^24–27 Furthermore, the oxidation states of Ni, Co, and O are explored in the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum in Figure 3(a). The XPS results in Figure 3(b) show that the oxidation states of Ni belong to Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ with the signals at 853.7 and 870.9 eV conforming with Ni²⁺. Two other peaks at 855.3 and 872.3 eV are due to the Ni³⁺ species.²⁸ As observed in Figure 3(c), two satellite peaks located at 779.2 and 780.6 eV fit well with Co 2p_3/2, while the other peaks located at 794.4 and 780.6 eV are the satellite peaks of Co 2p_1/2. Similarly, the O 1s spectrum of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ is well resolved into three components at 529.3, 531.7, and 533.3 eV.

Figure 1.

A schematic diagram of the processes involved in product formation.

Figure 2.

XRD patterns of (a) ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ precursor and (b) NiCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

Figure 3.

The full survey XPS spectrum of (a) Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ and (b–d) XPS spectra for Ni 2p, Co 2p, and O 1s of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

The morphologies and microstructures of ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figure 4(a), it is observed that the microstructure of ZIF-67 exhibits a rhombic polyhedron structure with a size in the range of 500 nm. Along with the addition of Co(NO₃)₂ and methanol to 2-MIM, ZIF clusters can be generated by the deprotonation/coordination of imidazoles with Co²⁺. Next, the ZIF clusters are converted into ZIF-67 polyhedra becoming the skeleton template for NiCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄. On addition of Ni(NO₃)₂ to the ZIF-67 polyhedron, a hollow structure assembled by nanosheets NiCo₂O₄ was prepared due to the etching reaction between released H⁺ (the hydrolysis of nickel ions and cobalt ions) and 2-MIM linkers of ZIF-67.²⁹ Besides, two metals with different diffusion rates can form inner defects and assist in forming a hollow structure due to the Kirkendall effect.³⁰ From Figure 4(d), it can be seen that the morphology of NiCo₂O₄ inherits the hollow structure after completing the one-step annealing, but it exhibits larger cavities than the precursor because of decomposition of the organic components and structural reorganization during the calcination process.³¹ The SEM images in Figure 4(c) and (e) reveal that the morphology of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ was changed after adding Ni(NO₃)₂ and Co(NO₃)₂ to ZIF-67, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ exhibits an interconnected sheet-like shape. The mechanism of formation of nanosheets may be interpreted by the following processes. The protons produced by the hydrolysis of Ni²⁺ ions can bind to Co-MOF resulting in liberation of Co²⁺ ions. Meanwhile, part of the liberated Co²⁺ ions are oxidized to Co³⁺ ions by dissolved O₂ and NO₃⁻ in the solution, which coprecipitate with Ni²⁺ ions to generate nanosheets.^29,32,33 Besides, more nickel nitrate and cobalt nitrate were added in the process of preparing Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ than the preparation of NiCo₂O₄. The reaction system has higher hydrolysis rate because of the lower pH value,³⁴ resulting in the formation of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ nanosheets.

Figure 4.

SEM images of (a) ZIF-67, (b) the NiCo₂O₄ precursor, (c) the Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ precursor, (d) NiCo₂O₄, and (e) Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

To confirm the presence of Ni, Co, and O in the composites, energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) full mapping was completed. As shown in Figure 5(b)–(d) and Table 1, O, Co, and Ni are distributed in Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄, and values of 50.47 wt% (O), 39.18 wt% (Co), and 10.35 wt% (Ni) were determined. As revealed by the TEM images, the obtained Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ presents a nanosheet structure, which corresponds to the SEM images. The microstructure of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ was further analyzed by HRTEM (Figure 6(d)–(f)). The lattice fringes are measured to be 0.20 and 0.29 nm, corresponding to the (400) and (220) planes of NiCo₂O₄.^35,36 Furthermore, the measured lattice fringes of Co₃O₄ are about 0.24 and 0.47 nm, matching with (311) and (111) crystal plane. Meanwhile, the results of TEM and HRTEM matched the data from XRD.

Figure 5.

SEM mapping image of (a) Co3O4/NiCo2O4 and (b–d) elemental mapping of O, Co, and Ni in Co3O4/NiCo2O4.

Table 1.

The element distribution in Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

Element	Weight percent %	Atomic percent %
O	21.68	50.47
Co	62.00	39.18
Ni	16.32	10.35

Figure 6.

TEM and HRTEM images for (a–c) NiCo₂O₄ and (d–f) Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

Figure 7(a) shows the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ at a constant rate of 5 mV s⁻¹ within the work potential window of 0.1–0.35 V. From each CV profile, it can be observed that redox peaks are more obvious in the case of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ as compared to ZIF-67 and NiCo₂O₄, and the CV integrated area of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ is the largest, indicating that it delivers a better specific capacitance and has higher redox activity than the other electrodes.³⁵ The CV curves of ZIF- 67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ under different scan rates from 5 to 80 mV s⁻¹ are shown in Figure 7(b)–(d). On increasing the scanning speed, the CV curves still maintain a pair of representative redox peaks, while a positive shift of the oxidation peak and a negative shift of the reduction peak are also observed, indicating typical pseudocapacitive characteristics.^37–39 For anodic and cathodic peaks, the mechanism of energy storage may be ascribed to the surface redox reactions of the Co²⁺/Co³⁺/Co⁴⁺ and Ni²⁺/Ni³⁺ redox couples in 6 M KOH electrolyte.^40,41 The reactions can be plausibly suggested as follows^9,42,43

N i C o_{2} O_{4} + O H^{-} + H_{2} O \leftrightarrow 2 C o O O H + N i O O H + e^{-}

(1)

C o_{3} O_{4} + O H^{-} \leftrightarrow C o O O H + e^{-}

(2)

C o O O H + O H^{-} \leftrightarrow C o O_{2} + H_{2} O + e^{-}

(3)

Figure 7.

The cyclic voltammograms of (a) ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ at a scan of 5 mV s⁻¹, (b–d) ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ at different scan rates, and (e) square root of scan rate versus current density for Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

The linear fit is shown in Figure 7(e), which is obtained from the square root of the scan rate versus the current density. The correlation coefficient is R² = 0.9990 for the cathodic and R² = 0.9989 for the anodic peaks, suggesting that the obtained electrode system is controlled by a typical diffusion process.⁴⁴

The galvanostatic charge and discharge (GCD) curves of ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ at current densities of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 A g⁻¹ are shown in Figure 8. It can be observed that all the electrodes possessed no linear charge and discharge curves with notable discharge platforms, indicating the pseudocapacitance behavior of the charge- discharge process owing to the redox reactions of Co(Ⅱ) to Co(Ⅲ), Co(Ⅲ) to Co(Ⅳ), and Ni(Ⅱ) to Ni(Ⅲ).⁴⁵ The charge curve of the Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ electrode exhibits a longer discharge platform among the three samples at a current density of 0.5 A g⁻¹, which has a better faradaic redox reversibility and rate capability.³¹ Figure 8(f) shows the specific capacitance of three electrodes at different current densities. The specific capacitance of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ is calculated to be 846 F g⁻¹ at 0.5 A g⁻¹, while the specific capacitance of NiCo₂O₄ and ZIF-67 are 522 and 354 F g⁻¹. The specific capacitance (Cs) of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ was larger than those of ZIF-67 and NiCo₂O₄. The enhancement of the capacitive performance of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ can be attributed to its better redox reactions and higher electronic conductivity than the monometallic oxides. The valence bond exchange or charge hopping between nickel and cobalt ions can also increase electrochemical performance.⁴⁶

Figure 8.

GCD curves (a) several electrodes at a current of 0.5 A g⁻¹; (b–d) ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ in 6.0 M KOH with different current densities; (e) the electrochemical impedance spectra of ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄; and (f) the specific capacitance of ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄.

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the ZIF-67, NiCo₂O₄, and Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ electrodes are shown in Figure 8(e), which can be simulated by an equivalent circuit. The abscissa of the intersection point of the impedance spectrum and the Z’ axis is the series resistance (Rs), describing the internal resistance of the electrodes, the resistance of the electrolyte, and the contact between the electrode and current collector.⁴⁷ The Rs values of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄, NiCo₂O₄, and ZIF-67 were 0.687 Ω, 0.724 Ω, and 0.887 Ω, respectively. The slope of the straight line in the low frequency region represents the Warburg resistance (Zw), reflecting the diffusion into the electrode. A higher slope indicates a lower resistance to diffusion, evidently the Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ electrode presents a bigger slope than the others.^48,49 The charge transfer resistance (Rct) value of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ is estimated to be about 3.01 Ω, which is lower than those of NiCo₂O₄ (3.28 Ω) and ZIF-67 (3.59 Ω). In addition, NiCo₂O₄ shows a lower charge transfer resistance than ZIF-67, the reason is that its special hollow structure provides more active centers and improves the ion diffusion rate. This lower Rs and Rct value of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ indicates that it has a better electrochemical performance among the other electrodes. On the contrary, no completed semicircle in the high frequency region is observed in the plot for several electrodes because the electrochemical device is greatly affected by diffusive impedance from OH⁻ ions.⁵⁰ The comparison of the Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ electrode in this work with those electrodes previously reported is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Comparison of the electrochemical performance of Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ in this work with previously reported studies.

Sample	Test solution	Specific capacitance (F g⁻¹)	Current density (A g⁻¹)	Ref.
NiCo₂O₄/NiO/Co₃O₄	KOH	1693	1.0	²⁸
Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄/NiO/C&S	6 M KOH	428.24	0.5	⁵¹
Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄	KOH	879.4	10.0	³⁵
Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄	2 M KOH	672	0.5	³⁶
Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄	2 M KOH	1450	1.0	⁵²
Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄	2 M KOH	430	1.0	⁵³
Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄	6 M KOH	846	0.5	This work

Conclusion

In summary, we have successfully fabricated hollow NiCo₂O₄ assembled by nanosheets and sheet-like Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ through preparing the MOF as a carbon skeleton, which was removed after annealing. Compared with ZIF-67 and NiCo₂O₄, the prepared sheet-like Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ as an electrode material has a maximum specific capacitance. The hollow NiCo₂O₄ surface reveals a porous structure that promotes the surface redox reaction. The accelerated electron migration and diffusion speed are conducive to improving the specific capacitance of the electrode materials. After adding cobalt and nickel ions to the MOF, the specific capacitance of the electrode material (Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄) is 846 F g⁻¹ at a current density of 0.5 A g⁻¹, and the transition metal oxide (Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄) can increase the electric capacity due to the multi-electron transfer reaction. In addition, Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ has the longest charging and discharging time, showing its good electrochemical performance. Therefore, the Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ prepared in this study has excellent electrochemical properties and can be used as an electrode material in supercapacitors.

Experimental

Chemicals and materials

Ethanol, methanol, potassium hydroxide, and isopropanol were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. 2-Methylimidazole, nickel nitrate hexahydrate, cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, polytetrafluoroethylene (5 μm), and acetylene black were purchased from Aladdin. All the chemicals are analytically pure and were used without any further purification. All experimental solutions were prepared using deionized water.

Sample preparation

2-Methylimidazole (40 mmol) and Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O (9 mmol) were dissolved in methanol (200 mL) by stirring. The two solutions were mixed thoroughly and aged at room temperature for 24 h. By centrifuging, the precipitates were collected and then dried at 60 °C for 12 h to give ZIF-67.

Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O (1 mmol) and ZIF-67 (0.2 g) prepared above were dissolved in ethanol (100 mL) by magnetic agitation for 120 min. The mixture was washed three times with distilled water and ethanol, dried at 60 °C for 12 h, and ground into a powder. Finally, the composites were calcined at 350 °C for 120 min under an air atmosphere with a heating rate of 1 °C min⁻¹ to give NiCo₂O₄. Co₃O₄/NiCo₂O₄ could be acquired in the same step by adding Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O (2 mmol) and Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O (1 mmol).

Material characterizations

The morphologies of the synthesized nanomaterials were analyzed by SEM (Zeiss Sigma 300) and TEM (JEOL JEM 2100). The purities and chemical compositions of the samples were determined by XRD using SmartLab 9 kw, operating at 40 kV and 40 mA, and the scanning range of 2θ is 5° to 90°. The states of the elements were analyzed by XPS (Thermo Scientific K-Alpha). Electrochemical measurements including CV, GCD, and EIS were obtained on an electrochemical workstation (CHI760E, China) using a three-electrode system.

Electrode preparation and electrochemical measurements

The catalyst, carbon black, and polyethylene with a mass ratio of 8:1:1 were dispersed ultrasonically for 1 h in isopropyl alcohol (2 mL) to form a mixed solution. Next, the mixed solution was coated onto the surface of nickel foam (1 cm × 1 cm) and dried at 60 °C for 12 h. A typical three-electrode system was composed of a working electrode (nickel foam), a counter electrode (a platinum gauze electrode), and a reference electrode (a saturated calomel electrode) to determine all the electrochemical properties of the samples. The electrolyte is 6.0 M KOH aqueous solution.

The specific capacitance (C_s) of several electrode materials can be calculated according to C_s = I ∆t/m ∆V, where C_s (F g⁻¹) is the specific capacitance, I (A) is the current, m (g) is the mass of active materials, ∆t (s) is the discharge time, and ∆V (V) is the potential range of the charge-discharge. EIS was measured in the range from 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of the article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Financial support from the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu University of Technology (XSJCX20_04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31800495), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20181040), and the College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Jiangsu Province (202011463008Z) is gratefully acknowledged.

ORCID iD

Chunyong Zhang

References

Ahmad

Iqbal

Baig

, et al. Electrochim Acta 2020; 364: 137147.

Yang

Yan

Chen

, et al. J Electroanal Chem 2019; 851: 113445.

González

Goikolea

Barrena

, et al. Renew Sust Energy Rev 2016; 58: 1189.

Doan

Pham

Nguyen

, et al. J Energy Storage 2020; 33: 102030.

Zuo

Zhou

, et al. Adv Sci 2017; 4: 1600539.

Afif

Rahman

SMH

Tasfiah Azad

, et al. J Energy Storage 2019; 25: 100852.

Vlad

Singh

Rolland

, et al. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 4315.

Saravanakumar

Priyadharshini

Ravi

, et al. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2017; 84: 297.

Zhou

Hao

Wang

, et al. Chem Eng J 2018; 351: 74.

10.

Pan

, et al. Colloids Surf A 2020; 609: 125650.

11.

Siwatch

Sharma

Tripathi

SK.

Electrochim Acta 2020; 329: 135084.

12.

Yang

, et al. J Alloys Compd 2017; 700: 247.

13.

Gao

Wang

, et al. J Alloys Compd 2021; 861: 157963.

14.

Furukawa

, et al. Sci 2010; 329: 424.

15.

Tang

Qian

, et al. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9: 38737.

16.

Yap

Fow

Chen

GZ.

Green Energy Environ 2017; 2: 218.

17.

Zhang

Yao

Ceram Int 2019; 45: 24279.

18.

Zhou

Kitagawa

Chem Soc Rev 2014; 43: 5415.

19.

Wang

Cui

Wang

Adv Mater 2019; 31: e1801993.

20.

Wang

, et al. Renew Energy 2020; 162: 535.

21.

Sundriyal

Shrivastav

Mishra

, et al. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020; 45: 30859.

22.

Sun

Deng

, et al. Inorg Chem 2015; 54: 8639.

23.

Zhang

Xiang

, et al. Chin Chem Lett 2020; 31: 2007.

24.

Dai

Yao

, et al. Appl Surface Sci 2021, 546: 149128.

25.

Lin

Chang

HA.

Chemosphere 2015; 139: 624.

26.

Feng

Qiu

, et al. Microchem J 2020; 155: 104762.

27.

Antony

Satpati

Bhattacharyya

, et al. Adv Mater Interfaces 2016; 3: 1600632.

28.

Feng

Huang

, et al. Chem Eng J 2019; 368: 51.

29.

Chen

Shen

Pan

, et al. Adv Sci 2019; 6: 1802002.

30.

Feng

Xiang

Qiu

, et al. Electroanalysis 2019; 32: 571.

31.

Han

Huang

Gong

, et al. J Mater Sci 2018; 53: 12477.

32.

Sun

Yang

Rui

, et al. J Mater Chem A 2015; 3: 8483.

33.

Luo

Wang

Liu

, et al. Energy Storage Mater 2019; 19: 370.

34.

Yang

Liu

Yan

, et al. Chem Eng J 2019; 370: 666.

35.

Zhu

Peng

, et al. Solid State Ionics 2019; 336: 110.

36.

Gao

Zhang

Huang

, et al. Ceram Int 2014; 40: 15641.

37.

Zheng

Han

Zhao

, et al. Mater Research Bull 2018; 106: 243.

38.

Chen

Xue

Cui

, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci 2020; 15: 966.

39.

Omar

Numan

Duraisamy

, et al. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 76298.

40.

Xiang

Meng

, et al. Sci Bull 2020; 65: 443.

41.

Umeshbabu

Rajeshkhanna

Rao

GR.

Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014; 39: 15627.

42.

Chen

Pang

Zhang

, et al. Electrochim Acta 2020; 330: 135326.

43.

Raphael Ezeigwe

Dong

Wang

, et al. J Colloid Interface Sci 2020; 574: 140.

44.

Packiaraj

Devendran

Venkatesh

, et al. J Energy Storage 2021; 34: 102029.

45.

Zhang

Bao

, et al. J Mater Chem A 2017; 5: 7474.

46.

Qiu

Bai

Dai

, et al. J Alloys Compd 2018; 763: 966.

47.

Mei

Munteshari

Lau

, et al. J Physical Chem C 2017; 122: 194.

48.

Zhang

Shu

, et al. Nano 2020; 15: 2050082.

49.

Zou

Zhu

Luo

, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci 2020; 15: 484.

50.

Hong

Park

Kim

Electrochim Acta 2019; 311: 62.

51.

Yan

Jiang

, et al. J Alloys Compd 2018; 764: 684.

52.

Han

Zheng

, et al. Nano Energy 2017; 31: 410.

53.

Sennu

Aravindan

Lee

YS.

J Power Sources 2016; 306: 248.

Design of ZIF-67 MOF-derived Co 3 O 4 /NiCo 2 O 4 nanosheets for supercapacitor electrode materials

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Results and discussion

Conclusion

Experimental

Chemicals and materials

Sample preparation

Material characterizations

Electrode preparation and electrochemical measurements

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References