Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but life-threatening condition, particularly among pregnant and postpartum women. However, estimates of its incidence, recurrence, and associated adverse outcomes remain inconsistent. Moreover, the role of antithrombotic prophylaxis in mitigating these risks has not been fully established.
Objective:
This study aimed to synthesize global evidence on the incidence of CVT during pregnancy and postpartum, evaluate recurrence rates of CVT and noncerebral venous thromboembolism (VTE), assess adverse pregnancy outcomes, and explore the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic prophylaxis in high-risk populations.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five major databases were searched for observational studies reporting CVT incidence, recurrence, or pregnancy outcomes in women with prior CVT or noncerebral VTE, covering the period from 1980 to September 2024, with an updated search completed on May 6, 2025. Data were pooled using random-effects models and heterogeneity was quantified via the I2 statistic.
Results:
Forty-seven studies encompassing 14,218 pregnancies were included. The pooled incidence of postpartum CVT was 7 cases per 100,000 deliveries (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3–15), with significant regional disparities (Asia: 19/100,000; Europe: 3/100,000). The recurrence rate of CVT was 10.2 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI: 5–21), while noncerebral VTE recurred in 15.3 per 1000 pregnancies (95% CI: 8–28). The crude risk of spontaneous abortion was 15.7% (95% CI: 13–19), with higher rates observed in women not receiving prophylaxis. Antithrombotic prophylaxis appeared to reduce the risk of noncerebral VTE recurrence but did not significantly affect CVT recurrence.
Conclusions:
CVT and noncerebral VTE pose substantial risks during pregnancy, particularly in women with prior thrombotic events. Although antithrombotic prophylaxis may offer partial protection, its benefits must be carefully weighed against potential maternal and fetal risks. These findings underscore the need for individualized management and further research to inform evidence-based clinical guidelines.
LanDZhangXHuangX, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of batroxobin combined with anticoagulation in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost2024; 30: 10760296241264516.
2.
O’BrienPHeaneyD.Cerebrovascular complications during pregnancy and the puerperium. Eur J Neurol2011; 18: 801–802.
3.
CoutinhoJMFerroJMCanhãoP, et al. Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis in women. Stroke2009; 40: 2356–2361.
4.
TateJBushnellC.Pregnancy and stroke risk in women. Womens Health (Lond)2011; 7: 363–374.
5.
LanskaDJKryscioRJ.Risk factors for peripartum and postpartum stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis. Stroke2000; 31: 1274–1282.
6.
SrinivasanK.Cerebral venous and arterial thrombosis in pregnancy and puerperium. A study of 135 patients. Angiology1983; 34: 731–746.
7.
LiangZ-WGaoW-LFengL-M.Clinical characteristics and prognosis of cerebral venous thrombosis in Chinese women during pregnancy and puerperium. Sci Rep2017; 7: 43866.
8.
PrabhuTRB. Cerebrovascular complications in pregnancy and puerperium. J Obstet Gynaecol India2013; 63: 108–111.
9.
JaigobinCSilverFL.Stroke and pregnancy. Stroke2000; 31: 2948–2951.
10.
LeffertLRClancyCRBatemanBTBryantASKuklinaEV.Hypertensive disorders and pregnancy-related stroke: frequency, trends, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol2015; 125: 124–131.
11.
BashiriALazerTBursteinE, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome following cerebrovascular accidents during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2007; 20: 241–247.
12.
SharsharTLamyCMasJL and for the Stroke in Pregnancy Study Group. Incidence and causes of strokes associated with pregnancy and puerperium. A study in public hospitals of Ile de France. Stroke1995; 26: 930–936.
13.
PabingerIGrafenhoferHKyrlePA, et al. Temporary increase in the risk for recurrence during pregnancy in women with a history of venous thromboembolism. Blood2002; 100: 1060–1062.
14.
MouallaHGarciaD.Vitamin K antagonists–current concepts and challenges. Thromb Res2011; 128: 210–215.
15.
BatesSMGreerIAMiddeldorpSVeenstraDLPrabulosAMVandvikPO.VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest2012; 141: e691S–e736S.
16.
CoutinhoJMZuurbierSMAramidehMStamJ.The incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis: a cross-sectional study. Stroke2012; 43: 3375–3377.
17.
SwartzRHCayleyMLFoleyN, et al. The incidence of pregnancy-related stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke2017; 12: 687–697.
18.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372: n71.
19.
StroupDFBerlinJAMortonSC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA2000; 283: 2008–2012.
20.
StangA.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol2010; 25: 603–605.
21.
EfthimiouO.Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events. Evid Based Ment Health2018; 21: 72–76.
22.
BradburnMJDeeksJJBerlinJA, et al. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med2007; 26: 53–77.
23.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ2003; 327: 557–560.
24.
HunterJPSaratzisASuttonAJBoucherRHSayersRDBownMJ.In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol2014; 67: 897–903.
25.
EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderM, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ1997; 315: 629–634.
26.
SkidmoreFMWilliamsLSFradkinKDAlonsoRJBillerJ.Presentation, etiology, and outcome of stroke in pregnancy and puerperium. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2001; 10: 1–10.
27.
JamesAHBushnellCDJamisonMGMyersER.Incidence and risk factors for stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol2005; 106: 509–516.
28.
KittnerSJSternBJFeeserBR, et al. Pregnancy and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med1996; 335: 768–774.
29.
JengJSTangSCYipPK.Incidence and etiologies of stroke during pregnancy and puerperium as evidenced in Taiwanese women. Cerebrovasc Dis2004; 18: 290–295.
30.
NarayanDKaulSRavishankarK, et al. Risk factors, clinical profile, and long-term outcome of 428 patients of cerebral sinus venous thrombosis: insights from Nizam’s Institute Venous Stroke Registry, Hyderabad (India). Neurol India2012; 60: 154–159.
31.
BehcetAEsrefAOzgurOAbdullahAMustafaA.Pregnancy-related strokes in southeast turkey. Neurosciences (Riyadh)2007; 12: 207–214.
32.
VerhoLTikkanenMÄyräsO, et al. Pregnancy-associated stroke and the recurrence of stroke and other complications in subsequent pregnancies: population-based retrospective cohort study. BJOG2023; 130: 1421–1429.
33.
Aguiar de SousaDCanhãoPCrassardI, et al. Safety of pregnancy after cerebral venous thrombosis: results of the ISCVT (international study on cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis)-2 PREGNANCY study. Stroke2017; 48: 3130–3133.
34.
HiltunenSPutaalaJHaapaniemiETatlisumakT.Long-term outcome after cerebral venous thrombosis: analysis of functional and vocational outcome, residual symptoms, and adverse events in 161 patients. J Neurol2016; 263: 477–484.
35.
PreterMTzourioCAmeriABousserMG.Long-term prognosis in cerebral venous thrombosis. Follow-up of 77 patients. Stroke1996; 27: 243–246.
36.
CironJGodenècheGVandammeX, et al. Obstetrical outcome of young women with a past history of cerebral venous thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis2013; 36: 55–61.
37.
FerroJMCanhãoPStamJBousserMGBarinagarrementeriaF and ISCVT Investigators. Prognosis of cerebral vein and Dural sinus thrombosis: results of the international study on cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke2004; 35: 664–670.
38.
FerroJMLopesMGRosasMJFerroMAFontesJ and Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Portugese Collaborative Study Group. Long-term prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis2002; 13: 272–278.
39.
BreteauGMounier-VehierFGodefroyO, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis 3-year clinical outcome in 55 consecutive patients. J Neurol2003; 250: 29–35.
40.
MehraeinSOrtweinHBuschMWeihMEinhäuplKMasuhrF.Risk of recurrence of cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis during subsequent pregnancy and puerperium. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2003; 74: 814–816.
41.
AppenzellerSZellerCBAnnichino-BizzachiJM, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: influence of risk factors and imaging findings on prognosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2005; 107: 371–378.
42.
WuYTZhouLXYaoM, et al. Clinical features of CVT in women and effect on subsequent pregnancy: a follow-up study in a Chinese national comprehensive hospital. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2020; 29: 105274.
43.
StolzERahimiAGerrietsT, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: an all or nothing disease? prognostic factors and long-term outcome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2005; 107: 99–107.
44.
MartinelliIBucciarelliPPassamontiSM, et al. Long-term evaluation of the risk of recurrence after cerebral sinus-venous thrombosis. Circulation2010; 121: 2740–2746.
45.
Cruz-HerranzAIllán-GalaIMartínez-SánchezPFuentesBDíez-TejedorE.Recurrence of stroke amongst women of reproductive age: impact of and on subsequent pregnancies. Eur J Neurol2015; 22: 681–e42.
46.
MartinelliIPassamontiSMMainoA, et al. Pregnancy outcome after a first episode of cerebral vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost2016; 14: 2386–2393.
47.
PoliDCenciCTestaSPaolettiOSilvestriEAntonucciE.Obstetrical history of women with cerebral vein thrombosis: outcome of the pregnancies before and after the thrombotic event. Intern Emerg Med2017; 12: 941–945.
48.
AbbattistaMCapecchiMMartinelliI.Pregnancy after cerebral venous thrombosis. Thromb Res2019; 181: S15–S18.
49.
RottenstreichAGershgorenHSpectreG, et al. Factors associated with pregnancy outcomes in women with a history of cerebral sinus venous thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis2020; 50: 151–156.
50.
UluduzDSahinSDumanT, et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in women: subgroup analysis of the VENOST study. Stroke Res Treat2020; 2020: 8610903.
51.
FangTShuLElnazeirM, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of postpartum cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: a subgroup analysis of the ACTION-CVT study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2022; 31: 106865.
52.
AlSerehiAAAl MufarrihBMAbu-ShaheenASalehAAlSheefM.Safety of pregnancy after cerebral venous thrombosis: a case-control study. Health Sci Rep2024; 7: e1872.
53.
WangSYaoMHuN, et al. The risk profiles of pregnancy-related cerebral venous thrombosis: a retrospective study in a comprehensive hospital. BMC Neurol2024; 24: 182.
54.
WiebersDOWhisnantJP.The incidence of stroke among pregnant women in Rochester, Minn, 1955 through 1979. JAMA1985; 254: 3055–3057.
55.
SimolkeGACoxSMCunninghamFG.Cerebrovascular accidents complicating pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol1991; 78: 37–42.
56.
LanskaDJKryscioRJ.Peripartum stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis in the national hospital discharge survey. Obstet Gynecol1997; 89: 413–418.
LanskaDJKryscioRJ.Stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium. Neurology1998; 51: 1622–1628.
59.
LiangC-CChangS-DLaiS-L, et al. Stroke complicating pregnancy and the puerperium. Eur J Neurol2006; 13: 1256–1260.
60.
LiuSChanW-SRayJG, et al. Stroke and cerebrovascular disease in pregnancy. Stroke2019; 50: 13–20.
61.
MartinALaillerGBéjotY, et al. Incidence and time trends of pregnancy-related stroke between 2010 and 2018: the Nationwide CONCEPTION Study. Neurology2022; 99: e1598–e1608.
62.
PayneABAdamskiAAbeK, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in the United States, 2018 and 2019. Res Pract Thromb Haemost2022; 6: e12682.
63.
PourratONeauJPPouget-AbadieJFPierreF.Thrombosis risk during pregnancy after history of cerebral venous thrombosis. Rev Med Interne2015; 36: 10–14.
64.
LamyCHamonJBCosteJ, et al. Ischemic stroke in young women: risk of recurrence during subsequent pregnancies. French Study Group on Stroke in Pregnancy. Neurology2000; 55: 269–274.
65.
YuAYXNerenbergKADiongC, et al. Maternal health outcomes after pregnancy-associated stroke: a population-based study with 19 years of follow-up. Stroke2023; 54: 337–344.
66.
WangXChenSXuHZhangRZhanT.Trend, clinical characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes of pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism: a retrospective analysis of nearly 10 years. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2025; 38: 2448504.
67.
Aguiar de SousaDCanhãoPFerroJM.Safety of pregnancy after cerebral venous thrombosis: systematic review update. J Neurol2018; 265: 211–212.
68.
Nybo AndersenAMWohlfahrtJChristensP, et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ2000; 320: 1708–1712.
69.
Aguiar de SousaDCanhãoPFerroJM.Safety of pregnancy after cerebral venous thrombosis: a systematic review. Stroke2016; 47: 713–718.
70.
SaposnikGBarinagarrementeriaFBrownRD, et al. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2011; 42: 1158–1192.
71.
FerroJMBousserM-GCanhãoP, et al. European Stroke Organization guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis–endorsed by the European Academy of Neurology. European Journal of Neurology2017; 24: 1203–1213.
72.
MelovSJHitosK.Venous thromboembolism risk and postpartum lying-in: acculturation of Indian and Chinese women. Midwifery2018; 58: 13–18.
73.
HadiYHHawsawiHBAbu AqilAI.Driving healthcare forward: the potential of mobile MRI and CT units in streamlining radiological services in Saudi Arabia–a narrative review. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci2024; 55: 101444.
74.
TongYDingYHanZDuanHGengX.Optimal rehabilitation strategies for early postacute stroke recovery: an ongoing inquiry. Brain Circ2023; 9: 201–204.
75.
ZhaoMQiaoYWeissAZhaoW.Neuroprotective strategies in acute ischemic stroke: a narrative review of recent advances and clinical outcomes. Brain Circ2024; 10: 296–302.
76.
QiaoYFayyazAIDingYJiXZhaoW.Recent advances in the prevention of secondary ischemic stroke: a narrative review. Brain Circ2024; 10: 283–295.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
