Use of computed tomography perfusion for acute stroke in routine clinical practice: Complex scenarios,mimics,and artifacts

Abstract

Background

Computed tomography perfusion is becoming widely accepted and used in acute stroke treatment. Computed tomography perfusion provides pathophysiological information needed in the acute decision making. Moreover, computed tomography perfusion shows excellent correlation with diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion-weighted sequences to evaluate core and penumbra volumes. Multimodal computed tomography perfusion has practical advantages over magnetic resonance imaging, including availability, accessibility, and speed. Nevertheless, it bears some limitations, as the limited accuracy for small ischemic lesions or brainstem ischemia. Interpretation of the computed tomography perfusion maps can sometimes be difficult. The stroke neurologist faces complex or atypical cases of cerebral ischemia and stroke mimics, and needs to decide whether the “lesions” on computed tomography perfusion are real or artifact.

Aims

The purpose of this review is, based on clinical cases from a comprehensive stroke center, to describe the added value that computed tomography perfusion can provide to the stroke physician in the acute phase before a treatment decision is made.

Keywords

Computed tomography perfusion stroke acute stroke therapy penumbra reperfusion therapies acute imaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rowley

. The four Ps of acute stroke imaging: parenchyma, pipes, perfusion, and penumbra. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 599–601.

Parsons

Pepper

Bateman

Wang

Levi

. Identification of the penumbra and infarct core on hyperacute noncontrast and perfusion CT. Neurology 2007; 68: 730–736.

Latchaw

Alberts

Lev

et al.

Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 3646–3678.

Parsons

. Perfusion CT: is it clinically useful? Int J Stroke 2008; 3: 41–50.

Bivard

Spratt

Levi

Parsons

. Perfusion computer tomography: imaging and clinical validation in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2011; 134: 3408–3416.

Lin

Bivard

Krishnamurthy

Levi

Parsons

. Whole-brain CT perfusion to quantify acute ischemic penumbra and core. Radiology 2016; 279: 876–887.

Bash

Villablanca

Jahan

et al.

Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1012–1021.

Bivard

Levi

Krishnamurthy

et al.

Perfusion computed tomography to assist decision making for stroke thrombolysis. Brain 2015; 138: 1919–1931.

Ang

Bivard

Levi

et al.

Multi-modal CT in acute stroke: wait for a serum creatinine before giving intravenous contrast? No!. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 1014–1017.

10.

Zussman

Boghosian

Gorniak

et al.

The relative effect of vendor variability in CT perfusion results: a method comparison study. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 468–473.

11.

Kudo

Sasaki

Yamada

et al.

Differences in CT perfusion maps generated by different commercial software: quantitative analysis by using identical source data of acute stroke patients. Radiology 2010; 254: 20–209.

12.

Ostergaard

Weisskoff

Benner

Rosen

Sorensen

. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 164–174.

13.

Austein

Riedel

Kerby

et al.

Comparison of perfusion CT software to predict the final infarct volume after thrombectomy. Stroke 2016; 47: 2311–2317.

14.

Campbell

BCV

Christensen

Levi

et al.

Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012; 43: 2648–2653.

15.

Lin

Bivard

Levi

Parsons

. Comparison of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance perfusion measurements in acute ischemic stroke: back-to-back quantitative analysis. Stroke 2014; 45: 1727–1732.

16.

McVerry

Dani

MacDougall

MacLeod

Wardlaw

Muir

. Derivation and evaluation of thresholds for core and tissue at risk of infarction using CT perfusion. J Neuroimaging 2014; 24: 562–568.

17.

Yang Q. Method and system for mapping tissue status of acute stroke. PCT International Application, PCT/IB2009/007446. International Publication on 20 May 2010.

18.

Yang Q. Method and system of obtaining improved data in perfusion measurements. PCT International Application, PCT/AU2004/000821. International Publication on 10 November 2005.

19.

Bivard

Levi

Spratt

Parsons

. Perfusion CT in acute stroke: a comprehensive analysis of infarct and penumbra. Radiology 2013; 267: 543–550.

20.

Campbell

Christensen

Levi

et al.

Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 2011; 42: 3435–3440.

21.

Cereda

Christensen

Campbell

et al.

A benchmarking tool to evaluate computer tomography perfusion infarct core predictions against a DWI standard. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016; 36: 1780–1789.

22.

Campbell

Christensen

Levi

et al.

Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012; 43: 2648–2653.

23.

Demeestere

Garcia-Esperon

Garcia-Bermejo

et al.

Evaluation of hyperacute infarct volume using ASPECTS and brain CT perfusion core volume. Neurology 2017; 88: 2248–2253.

24.

Campbell

Christensen

Foster

et al.

Visual assessment of perfusion-diffusion mismatch is inadequate to select patients for thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010; 29: 592–596.

25.

Lin

Bivard

Parsons

. Perfusion patterns of ischemic stroke on computed tomography perfusion. J Stroke 2013; 15: 164–173.

26.

Albers

Thijs

Wechsler

et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006; 60: 508–517.

27.

Lansberg

Straka

Kemp

et al.

MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 860–867.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.38 MB

3.74 MB