Goal-Driven Effects of Masked Priming in Advertising: How Word,Image,and Audio Priming Shape Consumer Brand Choices

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of masked priming in influencing brand preference under goal-relevant conditions. Two experiments with 370 undergraduate students in China tested word and image masked priming (Study 1) and auditory masked priming (Study 2), focusing on thirst motivation. In Study 1, both word and image primes (briefly presented at a nominal 23 ms) increased preference for the primed brand (C’estbon) only when participants were thirsty, with no significant difference between modalities. In Study 2, auditory primes (embedded “Yibao” in music) similarly boosted preference when goal-directed, but high-frequency (80 exposures) and low-frequency (40 exposures) conditions did not differ significantly. These findings corroborate the goal-dependency in masked priming effects across modalities, extend prior work to a logographic/tonal language context (Chinese), and highlight auditory priming in advertising as an under-explored domain. Effects are subtle and contingent on motivation alignment. Practical implications for marketers include strategic placement in high-motivation contexts.

Keywords

masked priming goal-directed priming brand preference consumer behavior auditory priming Chinese logographic script

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albarrak

Metatla

Roudaut

(2021). Exploring the influence of subliminal stimulus type and peripheral angle on the priming effect. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 151, 102631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102631

Angele

Baciero

Gómez

Perea

(2023). Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming. Behavior Research Methods, 55(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01742-y

Barnes

S. J.

Wang

(2025). “I like the sound of that”: Understanding the effectiveness of audio in ads. Internet Research, 35(3), 1104–1125. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2023-0898

Bermeitinger

Goelz

Johr

Neumann

Ecker

U. K.

Doerr

(2009). The hidden persuaders break into the tired brain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.001

Brooks

S. J.

Savov

Allzén

Benedict

Fredriksson

Schiöth

H. B.

(2012). Exposure to subliminal arousing stimuli induces robust activation in the amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, insular cortex and primary visual cortex: A systematic meta-analysis of fMRI studies. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2962–2973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.077

Bruno

N. M.

Embon

Rivera

M. N. D.

Giménez

D’Amelio

T. A.

Batán

S. T.

Guarracino

J. F.

Iorio

A. A.

Andreau

J. M.

(2020). Faster might not be better: Pictures may not elicit a stronger unconscious priming effect than words when modulated by semantic similarity. Consciousness and Cognition, 81, 102932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102932

Chng

K. Y.

Yap

M. J.

Goh

W. D.

(2019). Cross-modal masked repetition and semantic priming in auditory lexical decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1540-8

Elgendi

Kumar

Barbic

Howard

Abbott

Cichocki

(2018). Subliminal priming—State of the art and future perspectives. Behavioral Sciences, 8(6), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060054

Erdelyi

M. H.

(2004). Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00051-5

10.

Ferrand

Brysbaert

Keuleers

New

Bonin

Méot

Augustinova

Pallier

(2011). Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from Chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306

11.

Gomez

Perea

Ratcliff

(2013). A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: Are they qualitatively different? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(6), 1731. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032333

12.

Liversedge

S. P.

(2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038639

13.

Harris

J. L.

Salus

Rerecich

Larsen

(1996). Distinguishing detection from identification in subliminal auditory perception: A review and critique of Merikle’s study. The Journal of General Psychology, 123(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1996.9921258

14.

Hsu

Chen

Y.-J.

(2020). Neuromarketing, subliminal advertising, and hotel selection: An EEG study. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.04.0

15.

Karremans

J. C.

Stroebe

Claus

(2006). Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(6), 792–798.

16.

Kouider

de Gardelle

Dehaene

Dupoux

Pallier

(2010). Cerebral bases of subliminal speech priming. NeuroImage, 49(1), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.043

17.

Labusch

Duñabeitia

J. A.

Perea

(2024). Visual word identification beyond common words: The role of font and letter case in brand names. Memory & Cognition, 52(7), 1673–1686. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01570-3

18.

Lee

E.-J.

Choi

Han

Kim

D. H.

Kim

K. H.

(2020). How to “Nudge” your consumers toward sustainable fashion consumption: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.050

19.

Loersch

Payne

B. K.

(2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406921

20.

Merikle

P. M.

(1988). Subliminal auditory messages: An evaluation. Psychology & Marketing, 5(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220050406

21.

Milyavsky

Hassin

R. R.

Schul

(2012). Guess what? Implicit motivation boosts the influence of subliminal information on choice. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1232–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.001

22.

Minton

E. A.

Cornwell

T. B.

Kahle

L. R.

(2017). A theoretical review of consumer priming: Prospective theory, retrospective theory, and the affective–behavioral–cognitive model. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(4), 309–321.

23.

Monahan

J. L.

Murphy

S. T.

Zajonc

R. B.

(2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11(6), 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00289

24.

Ozkara

B. Y.

Bagozzi

(2021). The use of event related potentials brain methods in the study of conscious and unconscious consumer decision making processes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58(Article), 102202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102202

25.

Paivio

(1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295

26.

Petrosino

Almeida

(2026). Stages in lexical decision: Frequency attenuation in masked repetition priming is insensitive to prime duration. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 41, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2025.2587157

27.

Pottratz

S. T.

Hutchinson

J. C.

Karageorghis

C. I.

Mullin

E. M.

Zenko

(2021). Prime movers: Effects of subliminal primes, music, and music video on psychological responses to exercise. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa036

28.

Pratiwi

D. P. E.

Sulatra

I. K.

Suardana

I. G.

(2022). Subliminal messages in Bintang beer advertisements: a semiotic study. Jurnalistrendi: Jurnal Linguistik, Sastra, dan Pendidikan, dengan, 7(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.51673/jurnalistrendi.v7i2.1162

29.

Rouder

J. N.

Morey

R. D.

(2009). The nature of psychological thresholds. Psychological Review, 116(3), 655. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016413

30.

Sandberg

Del Pin

S. H.

Overgaard

Bibby

B. M.

(2022). A window of subliminal perception. Behavioural Brain Research, 426, 113842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113842

31.

Schmidt

Eisend

(2015). Advertising repetition: A meta-analysis on effective frequency in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460

32.

Shi

Zhong

(2005). A study on the effect and priming effect of subliminal perception and subliminal advertising. Psychological Science, 28, 683–685. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2005.03.048

33.

Shin

Y. K.

Proctor

R. W.

Capaldi

E. J.

(2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020541

34.

Skandrani-Marzouki

Marzouki

(2010). Subliminal emotional priming and decision making in a simulated hiring situation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69(4), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000025

35.

Smarandescu

Shimp

T. A.

(2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26, 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9294-1

36.

Song

Liu

Jiang

(2017). Xiaofeizhe pingbi gexinghua wangluo guanggao de yingxiang yinsu fenxi [Factors Affecting on Personalized Online Advertising Avoidance of Consumers]. Ruankexue, 31(12), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2017.12.24

37.

Sperber

R. D.

McCauley

Ragain

R. D.

Weil

C. M.

(1979). Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing. Memory & Cognition, 7(5), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196937

38.

Stafford

Grimes

(2012). Memory enhances the mere exposure effect. Psychology & Marketing, 29(12), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20581

39.

Statista. (2024). Advertising–China. (n.d.). https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/advertising/china

40.

Strahan

E. J.

Spencer

S. J.

Zanna

M. P.

(2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4

41.

Suresh

A. S.

Tandon

K. K.

(2018). A study of factors of subliminal advertising and its influence on consumer buying behavior. The International Journal of Management, 2(4), 23. https://doi.org/10.18843/IJMS/V5I2(4)/03

42.

Urban

M. J.

(1992). Auditory subliminal stimulation: A re-examination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74(2), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.74.2.515

43.

Vaško

Jurčišin

Rusková

Berčík

(2025). Subliminal audio stimulation: A theoretical overview of effects and mechanisms influencing perception. Inproforum, 18(1), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.32725/978-80-7694-102-1.17

44.

Verwijmeren

Karremans

J. C.

Stroebe

Wigboldus

D. H.

(2011). The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: The role of habits. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.004

45.

Weilbacher

W. M.

(2003). How advertising effects consumers. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-43-2-230-234

46.

Wyer

N. A.

Calvini

(2011). Don’t sit so close to me: Unconsciously elicited affect automatically provokes social avoidance. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 11(5), 1230–1234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023981

47.

Zacharia

A. B.

Hamelin

(2021). An analysis of subliminal static images and words using eye tracking techniques. In Thaichon

Ratten

(Eds.), Developing digital marketing (pp. 155–180). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-348-220211009

48.

Zajonc

R. B.

(1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848

49.

Zajonc

R. B.

(2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.001

50.

Ziems

(2004). The morphological approach for unconscious consumer motivation research. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(2), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021849904040152