Learning rapidly about the relevance of visual cues requires conscious awareness

Abstract

Humans have been shown to be capable of performing many cognitive tasks using information of which they are not consciously aware. This raises questions about what role consciousness actually plays in cognition. Here, we explored whether participants can learn cue-target contingencies in an attentional learning task when the cues were presented below the level of conscious awareness and how this differs from learning about conscious cues. Participants’ manual (Experiment 1) and saccadic (Experiment 2) response speeds were influenced by both conscious and unconscious cues. However, participants were only able to adapt to reversals of the cue-target contingencies (Experiment 1) or changes in the reliability of the cues (Experiment 2) when consciously aware of the cues. Therefore, although visual cues can be processed unconsciously, learning about cues over a few trials requires conscious awareness of them. Finally, we discuss implications for cognitive theories of consciousness.

Keywords

Consciousness learning attention masked priming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Janabi

Finkbeiner

(2014). Responding to the direction of the eyes: In search of the masked gaze-cueing effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0570-6.

Ansorge

Kunde

Kiefer

(2014). Unconscious vision and executive control: How unconscious processing and conscious action control interact. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 268–287. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.009

Atas

Faivre

Timmermans

Cleeremans

Kouider

(2014). Nonconscious learning from crowded sequences. Psychological Science, 25, 113–119. doi:10.1177/0956797613499591

Baumeister

R. F.

Masicampo

E. J.

Vohs

K. D.

(2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131126

Baayen

R. H.

Davidson

D. J.

Bates

D. M.

(2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.

Bekinschtein

T. A.

Dehaene

Rohaut

Tadel

Cohen

Naccache

(2009). Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1672–1677. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809667106

Blais

Harris

M. B.

Guerrero

J. V.

Bunge

S. A.

(2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 268–276. doi:10.1080/17470211003775234

Bodner

G. E.

Dypvik

A. T.

(2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 29–47.

Bodner

G. E.

Masson

M. E.

(2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645–652.

10.

Bodner

G. E.

Masson

M. E.

(2004). Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1–11.

11.

Bodner

G. E.

Masson

M. E. J.

(2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616–647. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2791

12.

Bodner

G. E.

Masson

M. E. J.

Richard

N. T.

(2006). Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1298–1311. doi:10.3758/BF03193273

13.

Bodner

G. E.

Mulji

(2010). Prime proportion affects masked priming of fixed and free-choice responses. Experimental Psychology, 57, 360–366. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000043

14.

Bodner

G. E.

Stalinski

S. M.

(2008). Masked repetition priming and proportion effects under cognitive load. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 62, 127.

15.

Boy

Sumner

(2010). Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 892–905. doi:10.1037/a0017173

16.

Byrne

R. M. J.

(2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249

17.

Clark

R. E.

(1998). Classical conditioning and brain systems: The role of awareness. Science, 280, 77–81. doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.77

18.

Crump

M. J.

Gong

Milliken

(2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316–321.

19.

Dehaene

Changeux

J.-P.

(2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70, 200–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018

20.

Dehaene

Charles

King

J.-R.

Marti

(2014). Toward a computational theory of conscious processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.005

21.

Dehaene

Kerszberg

Changeux

J.-P.

(1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 14529–14534. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529

22.

Dehaene

Naccache

(2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1-2), 1–37. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2

23.

Desender

Van Den Bussche

(2012). Is consciousness necessary for conflict adaptation? A state of the art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00003

24.

Draine

S. C.

Greenwald

A. G.

(1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.286

25.

Eimer

Schlaghecken

(1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737.

26.

Eimer

Schlaghecken

(2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64(1-2), 7–26. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5

27.

Eriksen

B. A.

Eriksen

C. W.

(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267

28.

Fanselow

M. S.

Poulos

A. M.

(2005). The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 207–234. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070213

29.

Forster

P. M.

Govier

(1978). Discrimination without awareness? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 289–295. doi:10.1080/14640747808400676

30.

Frings

Wentura

(2008). Trial-by-trial effects in the affective priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 128, 318–323. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.004

31.

Frith

(2010). What is consciousness for? Pragmatics & Cognition, 18, 497–551.

32.

Frith

C. D.

Metzinger

T. K.

(2016). What’s the use of consciousness? How the stab of conscience made us really conscious. In Engel

A. K.

Friston

K. J.

Kagic

(Eds.), The pragmatic turn: Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.blogs.uni-mainz.de/fb05philosophie/files/2013/04/Frith_Metzinger_Regret_2016_penultimate.pdf

33.

Gagliano

Vyazovskiy

V. V.

Borbély

A. A.

Grimonprez

Depczynski

(2016). Learning by association in plants. Scientific Reports, 6, 38427. doi:10.1038/srep38427

34.

Gratton

Coles

M. G.

Donchin

(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506.

35.

Heinemann

Kunde

Kiesel

(2009). Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 966–976. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.009

36.

Huxley

T. H.

(1874). On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. Nature, 10, 362–366.

37.

Jacoby

L. L.

Lindsay

D. S.

Hessels

(2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638–644.

38.

Jaśkowski

Skalska

Verleger

(2003). How the self controls its “automatic pilot” when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911–920.

39.

Jiang

van Gaal

Bailey

Chen

Zhang

(2013). Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2791–2798. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.020

40.

Kiss

Eimer

(2008). ERPs reveal subliminal processing of fearful faces. Psychophysiology, 45, 318–326. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00634.x

41.

Klapp

S. T.

(2007). Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: Strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1366. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1366

42.

Kouider

Dehaene

(2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 857–875. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2093

43.

Kunde

(2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198–205. doi:10.3758/BF03196485

44.

Kunimoto

Miller

Pashler

(2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294–340. doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0494

45.

Lamy

Salti

Bar-Haim

(2009). Neural correlates of subjective awareness and unconscious processing: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1435–1446.

46.

Lin

Murray

S. O.

(2014). Priming of awareness or how not to measure visual awareness. Journal of Vision, 14(1), 27–27. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.1.27.

47.

Lovibond

P. F.

Shanks

D. R.

(2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3–26. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.28.1.3

48.

Mathys

Daunizeau

Friston

K. J.

Stephan

K. E.

(2011). A Bayesian Foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, Article 39. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00039

49.

McClelland

J. L.

Rumelhart

P. D. P.

& PDP Research Group. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure, Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

50.

McCormick

P. A.

(1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168–180. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.168

51.

Norman

D. A.

Shallice

(1986). Attention to action. In Davidson

R. J.

Schwartz

G. E.

Shapiro

(Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1

52.

Panadero

Castellanos

M. C.

Tudela

(2015). Unconscious context-specific proportion congruency effect in a stroop-like task. Consciousness and Cognition, 31, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.016

53.

Persaud

McLeod

(2008). Wagering demonstrates subconscious processing in a binary exclusion task. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 565–575. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.003

54.

Pessiglione

Petrovic

Daunizeau

Palminteri

Dolan

R. J.

Frith

C. D.

(2008). Subliminal instrumental conditioning demonstrated in the human brain. Neuron, 59, 561–567. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.005

55.

Pockett

(2004). Does Consciousness Cause Behaviour? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(2), 23–40.

56.

Pockett

Banks

W. P.

Gallagher

(Eds.). (2009). Does consciousness cause behavior? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

57.

Posner

M. I.

(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231

58.

Reuss

Desender

Kiesel

Kunde

(2014). Unconscious conflicts in unconscious contexts: The role of awareness and timing in flexible conflict adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1701–1718. doi:10.1037/a0036437

59.

Reuss

Pohl

Kiesel

Kunde

(2011). Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82–91. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3

60.

Ridderinkhof

R. K.

(2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7.

61.

Salti

Monto

Charles

King

J.-R.

Parkkonen

Dehaene

(2015). Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts. eLife, 4, e05652. doi:10.7554/eLife.05652

62.

Schlaghecken

Eimer

(2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367–1382. doi:10.3758/BF03212139

63.

Schouppe

de Ferrerre

Van Opstal

Braem

Notebaert

(2014). Conscious and unconscious context-specific cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00539

64.

Seitz

A. R.

Watanabe

(2003). Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? Nature, 422, 36. doi:10.1038/422036a

65.

Shea

Frith

C. D.

(2016). Dual-process theories and consciousness: The case for “type zero” cognition: Table 1. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2016(1), niw005. doi:10.1093/nc/niw005

66.

Simon

J. R.

Wolf

J. D.

(1963). Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6, 99–105.

67.

Sokolov

E. N.

(1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545–580. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553

68.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651

69.

Sumner

Nachev

Morris

Peters

A. M.

Jackson

S. R.

Kennard

Husain

(2007). Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Neuron, 54, 697–711. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.016

70.

Tenenbaum

J. B.

Kemp

Griffiths

T. L.

Goodman

N. D.

(2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279–1285.

71.

Tononi

(2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5, Article 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-42

72.

Vadillo

M. A.

Konstantinidis

Shanks

D. R.

(2015). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 87–102. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0892-6

73.

van Gaal

Lamme

V. A. F.

Ridderinkhof

K. R

. (2010). Unconsciously Triggered Conflict Adaptation. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011508

74.

van Gaal

Naccache

Meuwese

J. D.

van Loon

A. M.

Leighton

A. H.

Cohen

Dehaene

. (2014). Can the meaning of multiple words be integrated unconsciously? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130212.

75.

van Gaal

Ridderinkhof

K. R.

van den Wildenberg

W. P. M.

Lamme

V. A. F

. (2009). Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1129–1139. doi:10.1037/a0013551

76.

Vossel

Mathys

Daunizeau

Bauer

Driver

Friston

K. J.

Stephan

K. E.

(2014). Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: A study of Saccadic response speed. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 1436–1450. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs418

77.

Webb

T. W.

Kean

H. H.

Graziano

M. S. A.

(2016). Effects of awareness on the control of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 1–10. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00931

78.

Wenke

Fleming

S. M.

Haggard

(2010). Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition, 115, 26–38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016

79.

Winkielman

Berridge

K. C.

(2004). Unconscious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 120–123. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00288.x

80.

Wokke

M. E.

van Gaal

Scholte

H. S.

Ridderinkhof

K. R.

Lamme

V. A. F.

(2011). The flexible nature of unconscious cognition. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25729. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025729

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB