Humans have been shown to be capable of performing many cognitive tasks using information of which they are not consciously aware. This raises questions about what role consciousness actually plays in cognition. Here, we explored whether participants can learn cue-target contingencies in an attentional learning task when the cues were presented below the level of conscious awareness and how this differs from learning about conscious cues. Participants’ manual (Experiment 1) and saccadic (Experiment 2) response speeds were influenced by both conscious and unconscious cues. However, participants were only able to adapt to reversals of the cue-target contingencies (Experiment 1) or changes in the reliability of the cues (Experiment 2) when consciously aware of the cues. Therefore, although visual cues can be processed unconsciously, learning about cues over a few trials requires conscious awareness of them. Finally, we discuss implications for cognitive theories of consciousness.
Al-JanabiS.FinkbeinerM. (2014). Responding to the direction of the eyes: In search of the masked gaze-cueing effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0570-6.
2.
AnsorgeU.KundeW.KieferM. (2014). Unconscious vision and executive control: How unconscious processing and conscious action control interact. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 268–287. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.009
BaumeisterR. F.MasicampoE. J.VohsK. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior?Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131126
5.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
6.
BekinschteinT. A.DehaeneS.RohautB.TadelF.CohenL.NaccacheL. (2009). Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1672–1677. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809667106
7.
BlaisC.HarrisM. B.GuerreroJ. V.BungeS. A. (2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 268–276. doi:10.1080/17470211003775234
8.
BodnerG. E.DypvikA. T. (2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 29–47.
9.
BodnerG. E.MassonM. E. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 645–652.
10.
BodnerG. E.MassonM. E. (2004). Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1–11.
11.
BodnerG. E.MassonM. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616–647. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2791
12.
BodnerG. E.MassonM. E. J.RichardN. T. (2006). Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1298–1311. doi:10.3758/BF03193273
13.
BodnerG. E.MuljiR. (2010). Prime proportion affects masked priming of fixed and free-choice responses. Experimental Psychology, 57, 360–366. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000043
14.
BodnerG. E.StalinskiS. M. (2008). Masked repetition priming and proportion effects under cognitive load. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 62, 127.
15.
BoyF.SumnerP. (2010). Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 892–905. doi:10.1037/a0017173
16.
ByrneR. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
17.
ClarkR. E. (1998). Classical conditioning and brain systems: The role of awareness. Science, 280, 77–81. doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.77
18.
CrumpM. J.GongZ.MillikenB. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316–321.
19.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ.-P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70, 200–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
20.
DehaeneS.CharlesL.KingJ.-R.MartiS. (2014). Toward a computational theory of conscious processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.005
21.
DehaeneS.KerszbergM.ChangeuxJ.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 14529–14534. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529
22.
DehaeneS.NaccacheL. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1-2), 1–37. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2
23.
DesenderK.Van Den BusscheE. (2012). Is consciousness necessary for conflict adaptation? A state of the art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00003
24.
DraineS. C.GreenwaldA. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.286
25.
EimerM.SchlagheckenF. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737.
26.
EimerM.SchlagheckenF. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64(1-2), 7–26. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5
27.
EriksenB. A.EriksenC. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
28.
FanselowM. S.PoulosA. M. (2005). The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 207–234. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070213
29.
ForsterP. M.GovierE. (1978). Discrimination without awareness?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 289–295. doi:10.1080/14640747808400676
30.
FringsC.WenturaD. (2008). Trial-by-trial effects in the affective priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 128, 318–323. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.004
31.
FrithC. (2010). What is consciousness for?Pragmatics & Cognition, 18, 497–551.
GaglianoM.VyazovskiyV. V.BorbélyA. A.GrimonprezM.DepczynskiM. (2016). Learning by association in plants. Scientific Reports, 6, 38427. doi:10.1038/srep38427
34.
GrattonG.ColesM. G.DonchinE. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506.
35.
HeinemannA.KundeW.KieselA. (2009). Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 966–976. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.009
36.
HuxleyT. H. (1874). On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. Nature, 10, 362–366.
37.
JacobyL. L.LindsayD. S.HesselsS. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638–644.
38.
JaśkowskiP.SkalskaB.VerlegerR. (2003). How the self controls its “automatic pilot” when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911–920.
39.
JiangJ.van GaalS.BaileyK.ChenA.ZhangQ. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2791–2798. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.020
KlappS. T. (2007). Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: Strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1366. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1366
42.
KouiderS.DehaeneS. (2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 857–875. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2093
43.
KundeW. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198–205. doi:10.3758/BF03196485
44.
KunimotoC.MillerJ.PashlerH. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294–340. doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0494
45.
LamyD.SaltiM.Bar-HaimY. (2009). Neural correlates of subjective awareness and unconscious processing: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1435–1446.
46.
LinZ.MurrayS. O. (2014). Priming of awareness or how not to measure visual awareness. Journal of Vision, 14(1), 27–27. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.1.27.
47.
LovibondP. F.ShanksD. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3–26. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.28.1.3
48.
MathysC.DaunizeauJ.FristonK. J.StephanK. E. (2011). A Bayesian Foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, Article 39. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00039
49.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartP. D. P. & PDP Research Group. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure, Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
McCormickP. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168–180. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.168
51.
NormanD. A.ShalliceT. (1986). Attention to action. In DavidsonR. J.SchwartzG. E.ShapiroD. (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
52.
PanaderoA.CastellanosM. C.TudelaP. (2015). Unconscious context-specific proportion congruency effect in a stroop-like task. Consciousness and Cognition, 31, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.016
53.
PersaudN.McLeodP. (2008). Wagering demonstrates subconscious processing in a binary exclusion task. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 565–575. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.003
54.
PessiglioneM.PetrovicP.DaunizeauJ.PalminteriS.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2008). Subliminal instrumental conditioning demonstrated in the human brain. Neuron, 59, 561–567. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.005
55.
PockettS. (2004). Does Consciousness Cause Behaviour?Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(2), 23–40.
56.
PockettS.BanksW. P.GallagherS. (Eds.). (2009). Does consciousness cause behavior?Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
57.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
58.
ReussH.DesenderK.KieselA.KundeW. (2014). Unconscious conflicts in unconscious contexts: The role of awareness and timing in flexible conflict adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1701–1718. doi:10.1037/a0036437
59.
ReussH.PohlC.KieselA.KundeW. (2011). Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82–91. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3
60.
RidderinkhofR. K. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7.
61.
SaltiM.MontoS.CharlesL.KingJ.-R.ParkkonenL.DehaeneS. (2015). Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts. eLife, 4, e05652. doi:10.7554/eLife.05652
62.
SchlagheckenF.EimerM. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367–1382. doi:10.3758/BF03212139
63.
SchouppeN.de FerrerreE.Van OpstalF.BraemS.NotebaertW. (2014). Conscious and unconscious context-specific cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00539
SheaN.FrithC. D. (2016). Dual-process theories and consciousness: The case for “type zero” cognition: Table 1. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2016(1), niw005. doi:10.1093/nc/niw005
66.
SimonJ. R.WolfJ. D. (1963). Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6, 99–105.
67.
SokolovE. N. (1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545–580. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553
68.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
69.
SumnerP.NachevP.MorrisP.PetersA. M.JacksonS. R.KennardC.HusainM. (2007). Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Neuron, 54, 697–711. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.016
70.
TenenbaumJ. B.KempC.GriffithsT. L.GoodmanN. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279–1285.
71.
TononiG. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5, Article 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-42
72.
VadilloM. A.KonstantinidisE.ShanksD. R. (2015). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 87–102. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0892-6
73.
van GaalS.LammeV. A. F.RidderinkhofK. R. (2010). Unconsciously Triggered Conflict Adaptation. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011508
74.
van GaalS.NaccacheL.MeuweseJ. D.van LoonA. M.LeightonA. H.CohenL.DehaeneS. (2014). Can the meaning of multiple words be integrated unconsciously?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130212.
75.
van GaalS.RidderinkhofK. R.van den WildenbergW. P. M.LammeV. A. F. (2009). Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1129–1139. doi:10.1037/a0013551
76.
VosselS.MathysC.DaunizeauJ.BauerM.DriverJ.FristonK. J.StephanK. E. (2014). Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: A study of Saccadic response speed. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 1436–1450. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs418
77.
WebbT. W.KeanH. H.GrazianoM. S. A. (2016). Effects of awareness on the control of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 1–10. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00931
78.
WenkeD.FlemingS. M.HaggardP. (2010). Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition, 115, 26–38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016
79.
WinkielmanP.BerridgeK. C. (2004). Unconscious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 120–123. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00288.x
80.
WokkeM. E.van GaalS.ScholteH. S.RidderinkhofK. R.LammeV. A. F. (2011). The flexible nature of unconscious cognition. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25729. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025729
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
