Studies of order effects have often been siloed into those focused on question order effects, which examine pairs of purportedly independent items, and information order effects, which ask participants to combine multiple pieces of information. We present data from both types of tasks demonstrating a previously unreported asymmetry, where negative stimuli have a stronger effect on subsequent positive stimuli than vice versa. Data are reanalyzed from three previously published studies of order effects, as well as two novel experiments; we observed consistent results across a variety of tasks and stimuli. These results are discussed in the context of both traditional models like Hogarth and Einhorn’s belief-adjustment model and more recent attempts to use quantum probability theory to model order effects.
ArielyD.NortonM.I. (2008). How actions create—Not just reveal—Preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 13–16.
2.
AueT.Okon-SingerH. (2015). Expectancy biases in fear and anxiety and their link to biases in attention. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 83–95.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BodenJ. M. (1998). Aggression and the self: High self-esteem, low self-control, and ego threat. In GeenR. G.DonnersteinE. (Eds.) Human aggression: Theories, Research, and Implications for Social Policy (pp. 111–137). Academic Press.
4.
BergusG. R.ChapmanG. B.LevyB. T.ElyJ. W.OppligerR. A. (1998). Clinical diagnosis and the order of information. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 18(4), 412–417.
5.
BurnsD. M.HohnemannC. (2023). Measurement effects in decision-making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 36(3), e2311.
6.
CacioppoJ.CacioppoS.GollanJ. (2014). The negativity bias: Conceptualization, quantification, and individual differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 309–310.
7.
EilD.RaoJ. M. (2011). The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 114–138.
8.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
9.
GoldsteinD. G.GigerenzerG. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75–90.
10.
HogarthR. M.EinhornH. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 1–55.
11.
HolyoakK. J.SimonD. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 3–31.
12.
KeltnerD.EllsworthP. C.EdwardsK. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effect of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740–752.
13.
KensingerE. A.Garoff-EatonR. J.SchacterD. L. (2006). Memory for specific visual details can be enhanced by negative arousing content. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 99–112.
14.
KobylińskaD.KusevP. (2019). Flexible emotion regulation: How situational demands and individual differences influence the effectiveness of regulatory strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 72.
15.
KoszegiB. (2006). Ego utility, overconfidence, and task choice. Journal of the European Economics Association, 4, 673–707.
16.
LeekE. C.PothosE. M. (2001). Open peer commentary. What is specific about category-specificity? Fractionating patterns of impairments and the spurious living/nonliving dichotomy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 487–488.
17.
McKenzieC. R. M.LeeS. M.ChenK. K. (2002). When negative evidence increases confidence: change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(1), 1–18.
18.
MooreD. W. (2002). Measuring new types of question-order effects: Additive and subtractive. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(1), 80–91.
19.
OhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear of learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
20.
PothosE. M.BusemeyerJ. M. (2022). Quantum cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 749–778.
21.
RussoJ. E. (2015). The predecisional distortion of information. In WilhelmsE. A.ReynaV. F. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics, judgment, and decision making (pp. 91–110). Psychology Press.
22.
SchwarzN. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656.
23.
SharotT.KanaiR.MarstonD.KornC. W.ReesG.DolanR. J. (2012). Selectively altering belief formation in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17058–17062.
24.
SharotT.VelasquezC. M.DolanR. J. (2010). Do decisions shape preference?: Evidence from blind choice. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1231–1235.
25.
TruebloodJ. S.BusemeyerJ. R. (2011). A quantum probability account of order effects in inference. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1518–1552.
26.
WangZ.SollowayT.ShiffrinR. M.BusemeyerJ. R. (2014). Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(26), 9431–9436.
27.
WhiteL. C.PothosE. M.BusemeyerJ. R. (2014). Sometimes it does hurt to ask: the constructive role of articulating impressions. Cognition, 133(1), 48–64.
28.
WhiteL. C.PothosE. M.JarrettM. (2020). The cost of asking: How evaluations bias subsequent judgments. Decisions, 7(4), 259–286.
