We present experimental evidence showing that different wh-filler-gap dependencies are processed differently, depending on their syntactic licensors. Our studies compared the active storage profiles for why, how, and who (serving as subject or object of the verb). The results of offline and online experiments revealed that these wh-fillers are stored in memory for different durations, and predictably so based on the hypothesised structural distance between each wh-filler and the licensor which determines its grammatical and interpretive functions. Furthermore, the results showed that once the wh-filler is licenced, it is integrated to the current structure, and no longer engenders additional memory costs. Based on these findings, we argue that the mechanism of online sentence processing may employ both storage and integration components in memory.
AbneyS. P.JohnsonM. (1991). Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067217
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
5.
BaleA. C. (2007). Quantifiers and verb phrases: An exploration of propositional complexity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(3), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9019-8
6.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
BresnanJ. W. (1973). Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(3), 275–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177775
10.
BrombergerS. (1992). On what we know we don’t know: Explanation, theory, linguistics, and how questions shape them. University of Chicago Press.
11.
BrowningM. (1987). Null operator constructions [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12.
ChacónD. A.ImtiazM.DasguptaS.MurshedS. M.DanM.PhillipsC. (2016). Locality and word order in active dependency formation in Bangla. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01235
13.
ChapmanC.KučerováI. (2016). Structural and semantic ambiguity of why-questions: An overlooked case of weak islands in English. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 1, 15. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v1i0.3713
14.
ChenE.GibsonE.WolfF. (2005). Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.001
15.
ChomskyN. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. eds. KosterJ.Van RiemsdijkH.New York, NY: Foris
16.
ChomskyN. (1977). On wh-movement. In CulicoverP. W.WasowT.AkmajianA. (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp.71–132). Academic Press.
17.
ChomskyN. (1986). Barriers (Vol. 13). MIT Press.
18.
ChomskyN.MillerG. A. (1963). Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In LuceR. D.BushR. R.GalanterE. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp.269–321). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111541587
19.
ChristensenR. H. B. (2019). A tutorial on fitting cumulative link mixed models with clmm2 from the ordinal package (Tutorial for the R Package ordinal). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal
20.
CinqueG. (1990). Types of A-dependencies. MIT Press.
FiebachC. J.SchlesewskyM.FriedericiA. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00004-9
27.
FrazierL. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 5(4), 519–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138988
GibsonE. (2000). The dependency locality theory A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In MarantzA.MiyashitaY.O’NeilW. (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first Mind Articulation Project symposium (pp. 95–126). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008
30.
GibsonE.ThomasJ. (1999). Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386293
GibsonE. A. F. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown [Doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University.
33.
GordonP. C.HendrickR.JohnsonM. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1411
34.
GordonP. C.HendrickR.JohnsonM. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003
35.
GrodnerD.GibsonE. (2005). Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science, 29(2), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7
36.
HaleJ. (2016). Information-theoretical complexity metrics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(9), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12196
HuangC. T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
39.
HuddlestonR.PullumG. (2005). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 53(2), 193–194.
40.
JackendoffR. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press.
41.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A.WoolleyJ. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
42.
KaanE.StoweL. (2002). Storage and computation in sentence processing a neuroimaging perspective. In NooteboomS.WeermanF.WijnenF. (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty. Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics (Vol. 30, pp. 257–295). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_9
43.
KawamuraT. (2007). Some interactions of focus and focus sensitive elements [Doctoral dissertation]. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
44.
KazaninaN.LauE. F.LiebermanM.YoshidaM.PhillipsC. (2007). The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(3), 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.003
45.
KeenanE. L.ComrieB. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177973
46.
KimN. (2019). Hold, Release, and Retrieve: The Study of Wh-Filler-Gap Dependencies and Ellipsis [dissertation]. Northwestern University.
47.
KimN.BrehmL.SturtP.YoshidaM. (2019, January3–6). Processing of different kind of fillers: Reactivated fillers vs. active fillers. The 93rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York, NY, United States.
48.
KimN.BrehmL.SturtP.YoshidaM. (2020). How long can you hold the filler: Maintenance and retrieval. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1626456
49.
KingJ.JustM. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(91)90027-h
50.
KluenderR.KutasM. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.196
51.
KoH. (2005). Syntax of Why-in-situ: Merge into [SPEC, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23(4), 867–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-5923-3
52.
LasnikH.SaitoM. (1994). Move alpha: Conditions on its application and output (No. 22). MIT press.
53.
LeeM. W. (2004). Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jopr.0000010514.50468.30
54.
LewisR. L.VasishthS. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
55.
LiZ.KimN. (2022). Asymmetries of English wh-adjunct/argument in negative island sensitivity: An experimental study. Discourse and Cognition, 29(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2022.29.4.37
56.
LowderM. W.GordonP. C. (2012). The pistol that injured the cowboy: Difficulty with inanimate subject–verb integration is reduced by structural separation. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.006
57.
McElreeB.ForakerS.DyerL. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00515-6
58.
MitchellD. C. (2018). An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods for investigating immediate processes in reading1. In KierasD. E.JustM. A. (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp.69–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505379-4 (Original work published 1984).
NessT.Meltzer-AsscherA. (2017). Working memory in the processing of long-distance dependencies: Interference and filler maintenance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1353–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9499-6
61.
NessT.Meltzer-AsscherA. (2019). When is the verb a potential gap site? The influence of filler maintenance on the active search for a gap. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(7), 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1591471
62.
NicenboimB.SchadD. J.VasishthS. (2021). Introduction to Bayesian data analysis for cognitive science (Under contract with Chapman and Hall/CRC Statistics in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Series). https://vasishth.github.io/bayescogsci/.
63.
OrthW.YoshidaM.SloggettS. (2021). Negative polarity item (NPI) illusion is a quantification phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(6), 906–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000957
RossH. (1984). Inner islands. In BrugmanC.MacaulayM. (Eds.), Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (Vol. 10, pp. 258–265). University of California, Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.1940
69.
RullmannH. (1995). Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts Amherst].
70.
StepanovA.StatevaP. (2015). Cross-linguistic evidence for memory storage costs in filler-gap dependencies with wh-adjuncts. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01301
71.
StepanovA.TsaiW. T. D. (2008). Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 26(3), 589–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9047-z
72.
StoweL. A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968608407062
73.
StowellT. (1985). Licensing conditions on null operators. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 4, 314–326.
VasishthS. (2006). On the proper treatment of spillover in real-time reading studies: Consequences for psycholinguistic theories. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence (pp. 96–100). University of Tübingen.
76.
WagersM. W.BorjaM. F.ChungS. (2015). The real-time comprehension of WH-dependencies in a WH-agreement language. Language, 91(1), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0001
77.
WagersM. W.PhillipsC. (2014). Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(7), 1274–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.858363
78.
WannerE.MaratsosM. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In HalleM. A.BresnanJ.MillerG. A. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119–159). MIT Press.
YoshidaM.NakaoC.Ortega-SantosI. (2015). The syntax of why-stripping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33(1), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9253-9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
