Four experiments with Chinese–English bilinguals were conducted in order to investigate the hypothesis of language nonselective access to an integrated lexicon for bilingual phonological representations. Results of a naming task (in Experiments 1 and 2) and a lexical decision task (in Experiments 3 and 4) showed homophone priming effects regardless of priming direction (English to Chinese, or Chinese to English) or English proficiency. Our findings are compatible with the BIA+ model of bilingual processing, provide further support for the hypothesis of language nonselective access to an integrated lexicon for bilingual phonological representations, and extend the hypothesis to language pairs with very different writing systems.
Modern Chinese frequency dictionary(1986). Beijing, China: Beijing Language College Press. Language teaching department.
2.
BrysbaertM.Van DyckG.Van de PoelM. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 137–148.
3.
ChenB. G.PengD. L. (2001). The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese word recognition (I).Acta Psychologica Sinica33, 11–6.
4.
ChenB. G.WangL. X.PengD. L. (2003). The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese word recognition (II).Acta Psychologica Sinica35, 5576–581.
5.
ChenH. C.HoC. (1986). Development of Stroop interference in Chinese–English bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition12, 397–401.
6.
DijkstraT.GraingerJ.van HeuvenW. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology.Journal of Memory and Language41, 496–518.
7.
DijkstraT.van HeuvenW. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition.Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. GraingerJ.JacobsA. M.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates189–225.
8.
DijkstraT.van HeuvenW. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition5, 175–197.
9.
DuyckW. (2005). Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudo-homophones: Evidence for non-selective phonological activation in bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 61340–1359.
10.
DuyckW.DiependaeleK.DriegheD.BrysbaertM. (2004). The size of the cross-lingual masked phonological priming effect does not depend on second language proficiency.Experimental Psychology51, 21–9.
11.
GollanT. H.ForsterK. I.FrostR. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and non-cognates in Hebrew–English bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23, 1122–1139.
12.
HaighC. A.JaredD. (2007). The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: Evidence from interlingual homophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition33, 4623–644.
13.
JaredD.KrollJ. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words?.Journal of Memory and Language44, 2–31.
14.
JaredD.SzucsC. (2002). Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2, 159–75.
15.
KaushanskayaM.MarianV.Activation of non-target language phonology during bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from eye-trackingPaper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago, IL2004, August.
16.
KimJ.DavisC. (2003). Task effects in masked cross-script translation and phonological priming.Journal of Memory and Language49, 484–499.
17.
LiuY.DunlapS.FiezJ.PerfettiC. A. (2007). Evidence for neural accommodation to a writing system following learning.Human Brain Mapping28, 1223–1234.
18.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.FiezJ.NelsonJ.BolgerD. J.TanL. (2007). Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation of the brain's reading network.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition10, 2131–146.
19.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.TanL. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading.Psychological Review112, 143–59.
20.
PerfettiC. A.TanL. H. (1998). The time of graphic, phonological and semantic activation in Chinese character identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition24, 1101–118.
21.
SchoonbaertS.DuyckW.BrysbaertM.HartsuikerR. J. (2009). Semantic and translation priming from a first language to a second language and back: Making sense of the findings.Memory and Cognition37, 5569–586.
22.
ShenD.ForsterK. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task.Language and Cognitive Processes14, 5/6429–459.
23.
TanL. H.PerfettiC. A. (1997). Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning?.Journal of Memory and Language37, 41–57.
24.
TzelgovJ.HenikA.SnegR.BaruchO. (1996). Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script homophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition22, 2336–349.
25.
van HeuvenW. J. B.DijkstraT.GraingerJ. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition.Journal of Memory and Language39, 458–483.
26.
Van WijnendaeleI.BrysbaertM. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28, 616–627.
27.
ZhangQ. X.DongY. P. (2006). Language non-selective access to bilingual phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese–English homophone priming Unpublished master's dissertation, Gongdong University of Foreign Studies, College of English Language and Culture, Guangzhou, China.
