Distinct abilities associated with matching same identity faces versus discriminating different faces: Evidence from individual differences in prosopagnosics and controls

Abstract

Previous face matching studies provide evidence that matching same identity faces (match trials) and discriminating different face identities (non-match trials) rely on distinct processes. For example, instructional studies geared towards improving face matching in applied settings have often found selective improvements in match or non-match trials only. In addition, a small study found that developmental prosopagnosics (DPs) have specific deficits in making match but not non-match judgements. In the current study, we sought to replicate this finding in DPs and examine how individual differences across DPs and controls in match versus non-match performance relate to featural versus holistic processing abilities. In all, 43 DPs and 27 controls matched face images shown from similar front views or with varied lighting or viewpoint. Participants also performed tasks measuring featural (eyes/mouth) and holistic processing (part–whole task). We found that DPs showed worse overall matching performance than controls and that their relative match versus non-match deficit depended on image variation condition, indicating that DPs do not consistently show match- or non-match-specific deficits. When examining the association between holistic and featural processing abilities and match versus non-match trials in the entire group of DPs and controls, we found a very clear dissociation: Match trials significantly correlated with eye processing ability (r = .48) but not holistic processing (r = .11), whereas non-match trials significantly correlated with holistic processing (r = .32) but not eye processing ability (r = .03). This suggests that matching same identity faces relies more on eye processing while discriminating different faces relies more on holistic processing.

Keywords

Face matching developmental prosopagnosia holistic processing feature processing eye processing individual differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abudarham

Bate

Duchaine

Yovel

(2021). Developmental prosopagnosics and super recognizers rely on the same facial features used by individuals with normal face recognition abilities for face identification. Neuropsychologia, 160, Article 107963.

Abudarham

Shkiller

Yovel

(2019). Critical features for face recognition. Cognition, 182, 73–83.

Adams

Hills

P. J.

Bennetts

R. J.

Bate

(2020). Coping strategies for developmental prosopagnosia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30, 1996–2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2019.1623824

Andrews

T. J.

Davies-Thompson

Kingstone

Young

A. W.

(2010). Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(9), 3544–3552.

Avidan

Tanzer

Behrmann

(2011). Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2541–2552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.002

Barton

J. J.

(2008). Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(1), 197–225.

Bate

Cook

S. J.

Duchaine

Tree

J. J.

Burns

E. J.

Hodgson

T. L.

(2014). Intranasal inhalation of oxytocin improves face processing in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex, 50, 55–63.

Bentin

Allison

Puce

Perez

McCarthy

(1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551–565.

Bindemann

Burton

M. A.

(2020). Steps towards a cognitive theory of unfamiliar face matching. In Bindemann

(Ed.), Forensic face matching (pp. 38–61). Oxford University Press.

10.

Biotti

Gray

K. L.

Cook

(2019). Is developmental prosopagnosia best characterised as an apperceptive or mnemonic condition? Neuropsychologia, 124, 285–298.

11.

Bobak

A. K.

Hancock

Bate

(2016). Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3170

12.

Burton

A. M.

White

McNeill

(2010). The Glasgow Face Matching Test. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 286–291.

13.

Corrow

S. L.

Dalrymple

K. A.

Barton

J. J.

(2016). Prosopagnosia: Current perspectives. Eye and Brain, 8, 165–175.

14.

Davis

J. P.

Dray

Petrov

Belanova

(2021). Low prevalence match and mismatch detection in simultaneous face matching: Influence of face recognition ability and feature focus guidance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(7), 2937–2954. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02348-4

15.

DeGutis

Chatterjee

Mercado

R. J.

Nakayama

(2012). Face gender recognition in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for holistic processing and use of configural information. Visual Cognition, 20(10), 1242–1253.

16.

DeGutis

Cohan

Nakayama

(2014). Holistic face training enhances face processing in developmental prosopagnosia. Brain, 137(6), 1781–1798.

17.

DeGutis

Cohen

Mercado

Wilmer

Nakayama

(2012). Holistic processing of the mouth but not the eyes in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(5–6), 419–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.754745

18.

DeGutis

Wilmer

Mercado

R. J.

Cohan

(2013). Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability. Cognition, 126(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.004

19.

Duchaine

B. C.

Nakayama

(2006a). Developmental prosopagnosia: A window to content-specific face processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 166–173.

20.

Duchaine

B. C.

Nakayama

(2006b). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576–585.

21.

Fisher

Towler

Eimer

(2016). Reduced sensitivity to contrast signals from the eye region in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex, 81, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.005

22.

Glanzer

Adams

J. K.

(1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.16.1.5

23.

Gross

Matthews

Cohn

Kanade

Baker

(2010). Multi-pie. Image and Vision Computing, 28(5), 807–813.

24.

Henriksson

Mur

Kriegeskorte

(2015). Faciotopy—A face-feature map with face-like topology in the human occipital face area. Cortex, 72, 156–167.

25.

Itier

R. J.

Alain

Sedore

McIntosh

A. R.

(2007). Early face processing specificity: It’s in the eyes!. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1815–1826.

26.

Jacques

Rossion

(2010). Misaligning face halves increases and delays the N170 specifically for upright faces: Implications for the nature of early face representations. Brain Research, 1318, 96–109.

27.

Konar

Bennett

Sekuler

(2010). Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609356508

28.

Le Grand

Cooper

P. A.

Mondloch

C. J.

Lewis

T. L.

Sagiv

de Gelder

Maurer

(2006). What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? Brain and Cognition, 61(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.11.005

29.

Malcolm

G. L.

Leung

Barton

J. J.

(2004). Regional variation in the inversion effect for faces: Differential effects for feature shape, feature configuration, and external contour. Perception, 33(10), 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5372

30.

Mckone

Yovel

(2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 778–797. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.16.5.778

31.

Megreya

A. M.

Bindemann

(2018). Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy. PLOS ONE, 13(3), Article e0193455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193455

32.

Megreya

A. M.

Burton

A. M.

(2007). Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(7), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193954

33.

Mishra

M. V.

Fry

R. M.

Saad

Arizpe

J. M.

Ohashi

Y. G. B.

DeGutis

J. M.

(2021). Comparing the sensitivity of face matching assessments to detect face perception impairments. Neuropsychologia, 163, Article 108067.

34.

Murray

Hills

P. J.

Bennetts

R. J.

Bate

(2018). Identifying hallmark symptoms of developmental prosopagnosia for non-experts. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 1690.

35.

Nemrodov

Anderson

Preston

F. F.

Itier

R. J.

(2014). Early sensitivity for eyes within faces: A new neuronal account of holistic and featural processing. NeuroImage, 97, 81–94.

36.

Ozbek

Bindemann

(2011). Exploring the time course of face matching: Temporal constraints impair unfamiliar face identification under temporally unconstrained viewing. Vision Research, 51(19), 2145–2155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.009

37.

Palermo

Willis

M. L.

Rivolta

Mckone

Wilson

C. E.

Calder

A. J.

(2011). Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.021

38.

Pancaroglu

Hills

C. S.

Sekunova

Viswanathan

Duchaine

Barton

J. J.

(2016). Seeing the eyes in acquired prosopagnosia. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 81, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.024

39.

Peterson

M. F.

Eckstein

M. P.

(2013). Individual differences in eye movements during face identification reflect observer-specific optimal points of fixation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1216–1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612471684

40.

Phillips

P. J.

Yates

A. N.

Hahn

C. A.

Noyes

Jackson

O’Toole

A. J.

(2018). Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(24), 6171–6176.

41.

Rezlescu

Susilo

Wilmer

J. B.

Caramazza

(2017). The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms with varied relationships to face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1961–1973. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000400

42.

Richler

J. J.

Cheung

O. S.

Gauthier

(2011). Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science, 22(4), 464–471.

43.

Richler

J. J.

Floyd

R. J.

Gauthier

(2014). The Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Test: A short and reliable measure of holistic face processing. Journal of Vision, 14(11), Article 10.

44.

Richler

J. J.

Palmeri

T. J.

Gauthier

(2012). Meanings, Mechanisms, and Measures of Holistic Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00553

45.

Rossion

Boremanse

(2008). Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: Evidence from the face composite illusion. Journal of Vision, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.4.3

46.

Rossion

Michel

(2018). Normative accuracy and response time data for the computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT-c). Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2442–2460. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1023-x

47.

Royer

Blais

Charbonneau

Déry

Tardif

Duchaine

. . . Fiset

(2018). Greater reliance on the eye region predicts better face recognition ability. Cognition, 181, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.004

48.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hunter

J. E.

(1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199–223.

49.

Shah

Gaule

Sowden

Bird

Cook

(2015). The 20-item prosopagnosia index (PI20): A self-report instrument for identifying developmental prosopagnosia. Royal Society Open Science, 2(6), Article 140343.

50.

Steeves

J. K.

Culham

J. C.

Duchaine

B. C.

Pratesi

C. C.

Valyear

K. F.

Schindler

. . . Goodale

M. A.

(2006). The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 594–609.

51.

Stumps

Saad

Rothlein

Verfaellie

DeGutis

(2020). Characterizing developmental prosopagnosia beyond face perception: Impaired recollection but intact familiarity recognition. Cortex, 130, 64–77.

52.

Tanaka

J. W.

Kiefer

Bukach

(2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93(1), B1–B9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011

53.

Tardif

Morin Duchesne

Cohan

Royer

Blais

Fiset

Duchaine

Gosselin

(2019). Use of Face information varies systematically from developmental prosopagnosics to Super-Recognizers. Psychological Science, 30(2), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618811338

54.

Torfs

Vancleef

Lafosse

Wagemans

de-Wit

(2014). The Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST), an online test to assess mid-level visual perception. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 472–487.

55.

Towler

Keshwa

Ton

Kemp

R. I.

White

(2021). Diagnostic feature training improves face matching accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(8), 1288–1298. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000972

56.

Towler

White

Kemp

(2017). Evaluating the Feature Comparison Strategy for Forensic Face Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000108

57.

Tsantani

Gray

Cook

(2020). Holistic processing of facial identity in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 130, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.003

58.

Ulrich

P. I.

Wilkinson

D. T.

Ferguson

H. J.

Smith

L. J.

Bindemann

Johnston

R. A.

Schmalzl

(2017). Perceptual and memorial contributions to developmental prosopagnosia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1177101

59.

Verhallen

R. J.

Bosten

J. M.

Goodbourn

P. T.

Lawrance-Owen

A. J.

Bargary

Mollon

(2017). General and specific factors in the processing of faces. Vision Research, 141, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.014

60.

Wang

Stanley

(1970). Differential weighting: A review of methods and empirical studies. Review of Educational Research, 40, 663–705.

61.

White

Rivolta

Burton

A. M.

Al-Janabi

Palermo

(2017). Face matching impairment in developmental prosopagnosia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1173076

62.

Young

A. W.

Burton

A. M.

(2018). Are We Face Experts? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.007

63.

Zhang

Song

Liu

(2012). The fusiform face area is engaged in holistic, not parts-based, representation of faces. PLOS ONE, 7(7), Article e40390.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.30 MB