I am the metre: The representation of one’s body size affects the perception of tactile distances on the body

Abstract

Humans must ground the perception of one’s body in a mental representation to move in space and interact with objects. This representation can be temporarily altered artificially. In the full-body illusion (FBI), participants see a virtual (or filmed) body receiving a tactile stimulation. When participants receive touches on their body similarly to the seen one (i.e., homologous location and synchronous timing), they embody the seen alien body. While the subjective embodiment of alien bodies of different sizes has been already manipulated with the FBI, it remains unexplored whether the body-metric perception is impacted too. We first developed a new setup for the FBI using 360° videos to favour the embodiment. The FBI was induced for bodies of three sizes adopting anatomical and non-anatomical viewpoints, and we measured the subjective embodiment. The results suggest that humans can embody normal size or bigger bodies seen from anatomical viewpoints, but not smaller ones. We then investigated if the FBI modulates the body-metric representation. We found that the resized bodies’ vision affects the perception of one’s body-metric representation, but this was independent of the embodiment, suggesting that the FBI alters the body representation at different levels with a specific impact.

Keywords

Body illusion body perception body metric tactile distance task

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banakou

Grotenac

Slater

(2013). Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Information, 110(31), 12846–12851. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas

Bookstein

F. L.

(1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press.

Botvinick

Cohen

(1998). Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784

Braithwaite

J. J.

Watson

D. G.

Jones

Rowe

(2013). A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments. Psychophysiology, 49(1), 1017–1034.

Carruthers

(2008). Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.001

Cox

T. F.

(2001). Multidimensional scaling used in multivariate statistical process control. Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(3–4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760120034108

D’Alonzo

Mioli

Formica

Di Pino

(2020). Modulation of body representation impacts on efferent autonomic activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(6), 1104–1116. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01532

De Vignemont

. (2011). Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.004

De Vignemont

. (2014). Shared body representations and the “whose” system. Neuropsychologia, 55(1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.013

10.

De Vignemont

Tsakiris

Haggard

. (2007). Body mereology. In Knoblich

Thornton

Grosjean

Shiffrar

(Eds.), The body from inside out (pp. 147–170). Oxford University Press.

11.

Dohle

Püllen

Nakaten

Küst

Rietz

Karbe

(2009). Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308324786

12.

Ehrsson

H. H.

(2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317(5841), 1048. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142175

13.

Everitt

(1997). The analysis of proximity data (Vol. 4). Arnold Publishers.

14.

Flor

Nikolajsen

Jensen

T. S.

(2006). Phantom limb pain: A case of maladaptive CNS plasticity? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7(11), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1991

15.

Gandevia

S. C.

Phegan

C. M. L.

(1999). Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation. Journal of Physiology, 514(2), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.609ae.x

16.

Garbarini

Fossataro

Berti

Gindri

Romano

Pia

. . . Neppi-Modona

(2015). When your arm becomes mine: Pathological embodiment of alien limbs using tools modulates own body representation. Neuropsychologia, 70, 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.008

17.

Giurgola

Pisoni

Maravita

Vallar

Bolognini

(2019). Somatosensory cortical representation of the body size. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 3534–3547. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24614

18.

Goodall

(1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 53(2), 285–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01825.x

19.

Green

B. G.

(1982). The perception of distance and location for dual tactile pressures. Perception & Psychophysics, 31(4), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202654

20.

Guterstam

Petkova

V. I.

Ehrsson

H. H.

(2011). The illusion of owning a third arm. PLOS ONE, 6(2), Article e17208. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017208

21.

Hallett

(2001). Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Research Reviews, 36(2–3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00092-3

22.

Head

B. Y. H.

Holmes

(1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102–254.

23.

Hofstede

(1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). SAGE.

24.

Kennett

Taylor-Clarke

Haggard

(2001). Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology, 11(15), 1188–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00327-X

25.

Kilteni

Normand

J.-M.

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Slater

(2012). Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: A very long arm illusion. PLOS ONE, 7(7), Article e40867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040867

26.

Lenggenhager

Tadi

Metzinger

Blanke

(2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1095–1099. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439

27.

Longo

M. R.

(2015). Implicit and explicit body representations. European Psychologist, 20(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000198

28.

Longo

M. R.

Azañón

Haggard

(2010). More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.022

29.

Longo

M. R.

Betti

Aglioti

S. M.

Haggard

(2009). Visually induced analgesia: Seeing the body reduces pain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(39), 12125–12130. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3072-09.2009

30.

Longo

M. R.

Cardozo

Haggard

(2008). Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.001

31.

Longo

M. R.

Golubova

(2017). Mapping the internal geometry of tactile space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(10), 1815–1827. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000434

32.

Longo

M. R.

Haggard

(2010). An implicit body representation underlying human position sense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(26), 11727–11732. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003483107

33.

Longo

M. R.

Haggard

(2011). Weber’s illusion and body shape: Anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021921

34.

Longo

M. R.

Haggard

(2012a). Implicit body representations and the conscious body image. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.015

35.

Longo

M. R.

Haggard

(2012b). A 2.5-D representation of the human hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025428

36.

Longo

M. R.

Mancini

Haggard

(2015). Implicit body representations and tactile spatial remapping. Acta Psychologica, 160, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.002

37.

Longo

M. R.

Morcom

(2016). No correlation between distorted body representations underlying tactile distance perception and position sense. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00593

38.

Longo

M. R.

Schüür

Kammers

M. P. M.

Tsakiris

Haggard

(2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107(3), 978–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004

39.

Mancini

Longo

M. R.

Kammers

M. P. M.

Haggard

(2011). Visual distortion of body size modulates pain perception. Psychological Science, 22(3), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398496

40.

Marino

B. F. M.

Stucchi

Nava

Haggard

Maravita

(2010). Distorting the visual size of the hand affects hand pre-shaping during grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 202(2), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2143-4

41.

Maselli

Slater

(2014). Sliding perspectives: dissociating ownership from self-location during full body illusions in virtual reality. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00693

42.

Pavani

Spence

Driver

(2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11(5), 353–359.

43.

Pavani

Zampini

(2007). The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception, 36(10), 1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5853

44.

Petkova

V. I.

Ehrsson

H. H.

(2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLOS ONE, 3(12), Article e3832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003832

45.

Press

Taylor-Clarke

Kennett

Haggard

(2004). Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation. Experimental Brain Research, 154(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1651-x

46.

Ramachandran

V. S.

Altschuler

E. L.

(2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 132(Pt 7), 1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp135

47.

Rohlf

F. J.

Slice

(1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Biology, 39(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992207

48.

Romano

Bottini

Maravita

(2013). Perceptual effects of the mirror box training in normal subjects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 31(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-120273

49.

Romano

Caffa

Hernandez-Arieta

Brugger

Maravita

(2015). The robot hand illusion: Inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency. Neuropsychologia, 70, 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.033

50.

Romano

Llobera

Blanke

(2016). Size and viewpoint of an embodied virtual body affect the processing of painful stimuli. The Journal of Pain, 17(3), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.11.005

51.

Romano

Maravita

(2014). The visual size of one’s own hand modulates pain anticipation and perception. Neuropsychologia, 57, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.002

52.

Romano

Maravita

Perugini

(2021). Psychometric properties of the embodiment scale for the rubber hand illusion and its relation with individual differences. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 5029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84595-x

53.

Romano

Pfeiffer

Maravita

Blanke

(2014). Illusory self-identification with an avatar reduces arousal responses to painful stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 261, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.049

54.

Sadibolova

Tamè

Walsh

Longo

M. R.

(2018). Mind the gap: The effects of temporal and spatial separation in localisation of dual touches on the hand. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNHUM.2018.00055

55.

Serino

Scarpina

Chirico

Dakanalis

Di Lernia

Colombo

Catallo

Pedroli

Riva

(2020). Gulliver’s virtual travels: Active embodiment in extreme body sizes for modulating our body representations. Cognitive Processing, 21, 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00977-5

56.

Shepard

R. N.

(1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210(4468), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.210.4468.390

57.

Slater

Perez-Marcos

Ehrsson

H. H.

Sanchez-Vives

(2009). Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.029.2009

58.

Sposito

Bolognini

Vallar

Maravita

(2012). Extension of perceived arm length following tool-use: Clues to plasticity of body metrics. Neuropsychologia, 50(9), 2187–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.022

59.

Stone

K. D.

Keizer

Dijkerman

H. C.

(2018). The influence of vision, touch, and proprioception on body representation of the lower limbs. Acta Psychologica, 185, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.007

60.

Taylor-Clarke

Jacobsen

Haggard

(2004). Keeping the world a constant size: Object constancy in human touch. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 219–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1199

61.

Tosi

Romano

Maravita

(2018). Mirror box training in hemiplegic stroke patients affects body representation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00617

62.

Tosi

Romano

(2020). The longer the reference, the shorter the legs: How response modality affects body perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(7), 3737–3749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02074-3

63.

Trojan

Getzmann

Möller

Kleinböhl

Hölzl

(2009). Tactile-auditory saltation: spatiotemporal integration across sensory modalities. Neuroscience Letters, 460(2), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.053

64.

Trojan

Stolle

A. M.

Kleinböhl

Mørch

C. D.

Arendt-Nielsen

Hölzl

(2006). The saltation illusion demonstrates integrative processing of spatiotemporal information in thermoceptive and nociceptive networks. Experimental brain research, 170(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0190-z

65.

Tsakiris

(2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034

66.

van der Hoort

Guterstam

Ehrsson

H. H

. (2011). Being Barbie: The size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLOS ONE, 6(5), Article e20195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020195

67.

World Medical Association. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373.

68.

Yuan

Steed

(2010). Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? In Virtual Reality Conference (VR) (pp. 95–102). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2010.5444807

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.07 MB