Knowledge revision is the process of updating incorrect prior knowledge in light of new, correct information. Although theoretical and empirical knowledge has advanced regarding the cognitive processes involved in revision, less is known about the role of emotions, which have shown inconsistent relations with key revision processes. This study examined the effects of experimentally induced emotions on online and offline knowledge revision of vaccination misconceptions. Before reading refutation and non-refutation texts, 96 individuals received a positive, negative, or no emotion induction. Findings showed that negative emotions, more than positive emotions, resulted in enhanced knowledge revision as indicated by greater ease of integrating correct information during reading and higher comprehension test scores after reading. Findings are discussed with respect to contemporary frameworks of knowledge revision and emotion in reading comprehension and implications for educational practice.
AriasiN.HyönäJ.KaakinenJ. K.MasonL. (2017). An eye-movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 202–221.
2.
BaasM.De DreuC. K.NijstadB. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
BekerK.KimJ.Van BoekelM.van den BroekP.KendeouP. (2019). Refutation texts enhance spontaneous transfer of knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 67–78.
6.
BergerJ.MilkmanK. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205.
7.
BodenhausenG. V.GabrielS.LinebergerM. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11(4), 320–323.
8.
Bohn-GettlerC. M. (2019). Getting a grip: The PET framework for studying how reader emotions influence comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(5-6), 386–401.
9.
Bohn-GettlerC. M.RappD. N. (2011). Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 562–577.
10.
BotvinickM. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulated function. Cognitive Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.
11.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148.
BroughtonS. H.SinatraG. M.NussbaumE. M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 529–550.
14.
ChangE. P.EckerU. K.PageA. C. (2019). Not wallowing in misery-retractions of negative misinformation are effective in depressive rumination. Cognition and Emotion, 33, 991–1005.
15.
ChiuM. H.LiawH. L.YuY. R.ChouC. C. (2019). Facial micro-expression states as an indicator for conceptual change in students’ understanding of air pressure and boiling points. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1469–1480.
16.
CoanJ. A.AllenJ. J. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press.
17.
DanielsonR. W.SinatraG. M.KendeouP. (2016). Augmenting the refutation text effect with analogies and graphics. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 392–414.
18.
DeRooS. S.PudalovN. J.FuL. Y. (2020). Planning for a COVID-19 vaccination program. Journal of the American Medical Association, 323, 2458–2459. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.8711
19.
DiakidoyI.-A. N.MouskountiT.FellaA.IoannidesC. (2016). Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning. Learning and Instruction, 41, 60–69.
20.
DignathD.EderA. B.SteinhauserM.KieselA. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 222–240.
21.
DixonG. N.ClarkeC. E. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35(3), 358–382.
22.
D’MelloS.LehmanB.PekrunR.GraesserA. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170.
23.
DonovanA. M.ZhanJ.RappD. N. (2018). Supporting historical understandings with refutation texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 1–11.
24.
DreisbachG.FischerR. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 72, 94–98.
25.
EckerU. K.LewandowskyS.ApaiJ. (2011). Terrorists brought down the plane!—No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 283–310.
26.
EstesZ.AdelmanJ. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). Emotion, 8, 441–444.
27.
FiedlerK.BeierS. (2014). Affect and cognitive processes in educational contexts. In AlexanderP. A.PekrunR.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 46–65). Routledge.
28.
ForgasJ. P. (2013). Don’t worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 225–232.
29.
FredricksonB. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In ZannaM.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Academic Press.
30.
GadgilS.Nokes-MalachT. J.ChiM. T. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 47–61.
31.
GasperK.CloreG. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40.
32.
GuzzettiB. J.SnyderT. E.GlassG. V.GamasW. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117–159.
33.
HeddyB. C.DanielsonR. W.SinatraG. M.GrahamJ. (2017). Modifying knowledge, emotions, and attitudes regarding genetically modified foods. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 513–533.
34.
HornseyM. J.HarrisE. A.FieldingK. S. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology, 37(4), 307–315.
35.
HyndC. R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(7–8), 699–714.
36.
Immunization Action Coalition. (2016). Personal belief exemptions for vaccination put people at risk: Examine the evidence for yourself. http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p2069.pdf
37.
JonesS. H.JohnsonM. L.CampbellB. D. (2015). Hot factors for a cold topic: Examining the role of task-value, attention allocation, and engagement on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 62–70.
38.
KaakinenJ. K. (2017). Research methods: Online measures of text processing. In SchoberM.F.RappD. N.BrittM. A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (pp. 125–130). Routledge.
39.
KendeouP.ButterfussR.KimJ.Van BoekelM. (2019). Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach. Memory & Cognition, 47, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y
40.
KendeouP.SmithE. R.O’BrienE. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 854–865.
41.
KendeouP.van Den BroekP. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577.
42.
KendeouP.WalshE. K.SmithE. R.O’BrienE. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397.
43.
KendeouP.O’BrienE. J. (2014). The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In RappD. N.BraaschJ. L. G. (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). MIT Press.
44.
KensingerE. A. (2009). What factors need to be considered to understand emotional memories?Emotion Review, 1(2), 120–121.
45.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
46.
MancaT. (2018). Fear, rationality, and risky others: A qualitative analysis of physicians’ and nurses’ accounts of popular vaccine narratives. Technology in Society, 55, 119–125.
47.
MartelM.PennycookG.RandD. G. (2019). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. https://psyarxiv.com/a2ydw/
48.
MatherM.SutherlandM. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114–133.
49.
McCruddenM. T.KendeouP. (2014). Exploring the link between cognitive processes and learning from refutational text. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S116–S140.
50.
MuisK. R.SinatraG. M.PekrunR.WinneP. H.TrevorsG.LosennoK. M.MunzarB. (2018). Main and moderator effects of refutation on task value, epistemic emotions, and learning strategies during conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 155–165.
51.
MurrayJ. D.EngleR. (2005). Accessing situation model information: Memory-based processing versus here-and-now accounts. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 261–272.
NaurothP.GollwitzerM.BenderJ.RothmundT. (2014). Gamers against science: The case of the violent video games debate. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 104–116.
54.
NugierA.LimousiF.LydiéN. (2018). Vaccine criticism: Presence and arguments on French-speaking websites. Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 48(1), 37–43.
55.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ.RicheyS.FreedG. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133, E835–E842.
56.
OmerS. B.PanW. K.HalseyN. A.StokleyS.MoultonL. H.NavarA. M.SalmonD. A. (2006). Nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements: Secular trends and association of state policies with pertussis incidence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1757–1763.
57.
PalmerD. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87(5), 663–684.
58.
PaulK.WalentowskaW.BakicJ.DondaineT.PourtoisG. (2017). Modulatory effects of happy mood on performance monitoring: Insights from error-related brain potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(1), 106–123.
59.
PhadkeV. K.BednarczykR. A.SalmonD. A.OmerS. B. (2016). Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: A review of measles and pertussis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(11), 1149–1158.
60.
PinheiroA. P.del ReE.NestorP. G.McCarleyR. W.GonçalvesO. F.NiznikiewiczM. (2013). Interactions between mood and the structure of semantic memory: Event-related potentials evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(5), 579–594.
61.
PluvianoS.WattC.Della SalaS. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies. PLOS ONE, 12, Article e0181640.
62.
PosnerG. J.StrikeK. A.HewsonP. W.GertzogW. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
63.
PrinzA.GolkeS.WittwerJ. (2018). Refutation texts compensate for detrimental effects of misconceptions on comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy and support transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 957–981.
64.
RichP. R.van LoonM. H.DunloskyJ.ZaragozaM. S. (2017). Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(3), 492–501.
65.
RottenbergJ.RayR. D.GrossJ. J. (2007). Emotion elicitation using films. In CoanJ. A.AllenJ. J. B. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 9–28). Oxford University Press.
66.
RoweG.HirshJ. B.AndersonA. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(1), 383–388.
67.
SangalangA.OphirY.CappellaJ. N. (2019). The potential for narrative correctives to combat misinformation. Journal of Communication, 69, 298–319.
SchmidtP. I.RosgaK.SchattoC.BreidensteinA.SchwabeL. (2014). Stress reduces the incorporation of misinformation into an established memory. Learning & Memory, 21, 5–8.
70.
SchuchS.KochI. (2015). Mood states influence cognitive control: The case of conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, 79(5), 759–772.
71.
SchwarzN.SkurnikI. (2003). Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 263–290). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615771.010
72.
ScriminS.PatronE.LanfranchiS.MoscardinoU.PalombaD.MasonL. (2019). Profiles of vagal withdrawal to challenging interactions: Links with preschoolers’ conceptual shifting ability. Developmental Psychobiology, 61(1), 116–124.
73.
SendereckaM. (2018). Emotional enhancement of error detection—The role of perceptual processing and inhibition monitoring in failed auditory stop trials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(1), 1–20.
74.
SotiriadisA.DagklisT.SiamantaV.ChatzigeorgiouK.AgorastosT., & LYSISTRATA Study Group. (2012). Increasing fear of adverse effects drops intention to vaccinate after the introduction of prophylactic HPV vaccine. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 285(6), 1719–1724.
75.
StorbeckJ.CloreG. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16(10), 785–791.
76.
TaasoobshiraziG.HeddyB.BaileyM.FarleyJ. (2016). A multivariate model of conceptual change. Instructional Science, 44(2), 125–145.
77.
ThackerI.MuisK. R.DanielsonR. W.SinatraG. M.PekrunR.WinneP. H.ChevrierM. (2020). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000434
78.
ThackerI.SinatraG. M.MuisK. R.DanielsonR. W.PekrunR.WinneP. H.ChevrierM. (2020). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1085.
79.
TippettC. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970.
80.
TrevorsG. (2020). The roles of identity conflict, emotion, and threat in learning from refutation texts on vaccination discourse processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1917950
TrevorsG. J.KendeouP. (2020). The effects of positive and negative emotional text content on knowledge revision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1326–1339.
83.
TrevorsG. J.KendeouP.BråtenI.BraaschJ. (2017). Adolescents’ epistemic profiles in the service of knowledge revision. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.005
TrevorsG. J.MuisK. R. (2015). Effects of text structure, reading goals, and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12031
86.
TrevorsG. J.MuisK. R.PekrunR.SinatraG. M.WinneP. H. (2016). Identity and epistemic emotions during knowledge revision: A potential account for the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 339–370.
87.
van den BroekP. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328(5977), 453–456.
88.
van den BroekP.KendeouP. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351.
89.
VanlessenN.RossiV.De RaedtR.PourtoisG. (2014). Feeling happy enhances early spatial encoding of peripheral information automatically: Electrophysiological time-course and neural sources. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 143(3), 951–969.
90.
van LoonM. H.DunloskyJ.van GogT.van MerriënboerJ. J.De BruinA. B. (2015). Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 39–48.
91.
van SteenbergenH.BandG. P. H.HommelB. (2010). In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science, 21, 1629–1634.
92.
VosoughiS.RoyD.AralS. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
93.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. University of Iowa.
94.
WeeksB. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65, 699–719.
95.
WhitmerA. J.GotlibI. H. (2013). An attentional scope model of rumination. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1036–1061.
WillK. K.MasadA.VlachH. A.KendeouP. (2019). The effects of refutation texts on generating explanations. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 108–115.
99.
YiendJ. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24(1), 3–47.
100.
ZolloF.NovakP. K.Del VicarioM.BessiA.MozetičI.ScalaA.QuattrociocchiW. (2015). Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10(9), Article e0138740.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
