Across three experiments, we sought to determine the effects of positive and negative emotional content in refutation texts on misconceptions about vaccines. The addition of negative emotional content to texts that identify, refute, and explain vaccine misconceptions improved knowledge revision observed during reading (Experiment 1). However, the addition of positive emotional content to refutation texts weakened this effect (Experiment 2). A direct comparison between negative and positive emotional content provided corroborating evidence for these findings (Experiment 3). Across experiments, results show that all refutation texts (with or without positive or negative emotional content) improved learning assessed after reading. These findings show the differential effects of emotional content on processing misconceptions about an important socio-scientific topic and provide consistent support for refutation texts as a potentially useful tool in these corrective efforts.
AckermanA.PuglisiB. (2012). The emotion thesaurus: A writer’s guide to character expression. CreateSpace.
2.
AguilarS. J.PolikoffM. S.SinatraG. M. (2019). Refutation texts: A new approach to changing public misconceptions about education policy. Educational Researcher, 48, 263–272.
3.
AlvesH.KochA.UnkelbachC. (2017). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 69–79.
4.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.
5.
AriasiN.HyönäJ.KaakinenJ. K.MasonL. (2017). An eye-movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 202–221.
6.
Bar-HaimY.LamyD.PergaminL.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IJzendoornM. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
7.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
8.
BodenhausenG. V.GabrielS.LinebergerM. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11, 320–323.
9.
BradyW. J.WillsJ. A.JostJ. T.TuckerJ. A.Van BavelJ. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 7313–7318.
10.
BroughtonS. H.SinatraG. M.NussbaumE. M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43, 529–550.
ChangE. P.EckerU. K.PageA. C. (2019). Not wallowing in misery—Retractions of negative misinformation are effective in depressive rumination. Cognition and Emotion, 33, 991–1005.
13.
DiakidoyI.-A. N.MouskountiT.FellaA.IoannidesC. (2016). Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning. Learning and Instruction, 41, 60–69.
14.
DolcosF.KatsumiY.WeymarM.MooreM.TsukiuraT.DolcosS. (2017). Emerging directions in emotional episodic memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1867.
15.
DukeN. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
16.
EckerU. K.HoganJ. L.LewandowskyS. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction?Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 185–192.
17.
EckerU. K.LewandowskyS.JayawardanaK.MladenovicA. (2019). Refutations of equivocal claims: No evidence for an ironic effect of counterargument number. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 98–107.
18.
EstesZ.AdelmanJ. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). Emotion, 8, 441–444.
19.
FazioL. K.RandD. G.PennycookG. (2019). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1705–1710.
20.
FredricksonB. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1–53.
21.
GadgilS.Nokes-MalachT. J.ChiM. T. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22, 47–61.
22.
GasperK.CloreG. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40.
23.
GordonA.QuadfliegS.BrooksJ. C.EckerU. K.LewandowskyS. (2019). Keeping track of ‘alternative facts’: The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections. NeuroImage, 193, 46–56.
24.
GrevingH.KimmerleJ.OeberstA.CressU. (2019). Emotions in Wikipedia: The role of intended negative events in the expression of sadness and anger in online peer production. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38, 796–806.
25.
GuzzettiB. J.SnyderT. E.GlassG. V.GamasW. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117–159.
26.
HallgrenK. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23–34.
27.
HeddyB. C.DanielsonR. W.SinatraG. M.GrahamJ. (2017). Modifying knowledge, emotions, and attitudes regarding genetically modified foods. Journal of Experimental Education, 85, 513–533.
28.
HewsonP. W.HewsonM. G. B. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1–13.
29.
HyndC. R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699–714.
30.
JonesS. H.JohnsonM. L.CampbellB. D. (2015). Hot factors for a cold topic: Examining the role of task-value, attention allocation, and engagement on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 62–70.
31.
KampS. M.PottsG. F.DonchinE. (2015). On the roles of distinctiveness and semantic expectancies in episodic encoding of emotional words. Psychophysiology, 52, 1599–1609.
32.
KendeouP.ButterfussR.KimJ.Van BoekelM. (2019). Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach. Memory & Cognition, 47, 33–46.
33.
KendeouP.O’BrienE. J. (2018). Reading comprehension theories: A view from the top down. In SchoberM. F.RappD. N.BrittM. A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (pp. 7–21). Routledge.
34.
KendeouP.O’BrienE. J. (2014). The Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) Framework: Processes and Mechanisms. In RappD.BraaschJ. (Eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives from Cognitive Science and the Educational Sciences. Cambridge: MIT.
35.
KendeouP.SmithE. R.O’BrienE. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 854–865.
36.
KendeouP.WalshE. K.SmithE. R.O’BrienE. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397.
37.
KensingerE. A. (2009). What factors need to be considered to understand emotional memories?Emotion Review, 1, 120–121.
38.
LarsenR. J.MercerK. A.BalotaD. A.StrubeM. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8, 445–452.
39.
LevineL. J.EdelsteinR. S. (2009). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 833–875.
40.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K.CookJ. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 353–369.
41.
LimónM. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380.
42.
LinderholmT.van den BroekP. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784.
43.
LinderholmT.VirtueS.TzengY.van den BroekP. (2004). Fluctuations in the availability of information during reading: Capturing cognitive processes using the landscape model. Discourse Processes, 37, 165–186.
44.
MarshE. J.RajaramS. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 1–14.
45.
MartelM.PennycookG.RandD. G. (2019). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. https://psyarxiv.com/a2ydw/
46.
MatherM.SutherlandM. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 114–133.
47.
MuisK. R.ChevrierM.SinghC. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165–184.
48.
NaurothP.GollwitzerM.BenderJ.RothmundT. (2014). Gamers against science: The case of the violent video games debate. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 104–116.
49.
O’BrienE. J.CookA. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338.
50.
O’BrienE. J.CookA. E.GuéraudS. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 979–991.
51.
ÖhmanA.LundqvistD.EstevesF. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.
52.
PekrunR.GoetzT.TitzW.PerryR. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105.
53.
PhadkeV. K.BednarczykR. A.SalmonD. A.OmerS. B. (2016). Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: A review of measles and pertussis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315, 1149–1158.
54.
PluvianoS.WattC.Della SalaS. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies. PLOS ONE, 12, Article e0181640.
55.
RappD. N.MensinkM. C. (2011). Focusing effects from online and offline reading tasks. In McCruddenM. T.MaglianoJ. P.SchrawG. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 141–164). Information Age Publishing.
56.
RoozenbeekJ.van der LindenS. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5, Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
57.
RoweG.HirshJ. B.AndersonA. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 383–388.
58.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
SchmidtP. I.RosgaK.SchattoC.BreidensteinA.SchwabeL. (2014). Stress reduces the incorporation of misinformation into an established memory. Learning & Memory, 21, 5–8.
61.
SendereckaM. (2018). Emotional enhancement of error detection—The role of perceptual processing and inhibition monitoring in failed auditory stop trials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 1–20.
62.
StrebelP. M.PapaniaM. J.GastañaduyP. A.GoodsonJ. L. (2018). Measles vaccines. In PlotkinS.OrensteinW. A.OffitP. A.EdwardsK. M. (Eds.), Plotkin’s vaccines (7th ed., pp. 579–618). Elsevier.
63.
SwireB.EckerU. K.LewandowskyS. (2017). The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1948–1961.
64.
ThackerI.SinatraG. M.MuisK. R.DanielsonR. W.PekrunR.WinneP. H.ChevrierM. (2019). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000434
65.
ThreadgillA. H.GableP. A. (2019). Negative affect varying in motivational intensity influences scope of memory. Cognition and Emotion, 33, 332–345.
TrevorsG. J.MuisK. R. (2015). Effects of text structure, reading goals, and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 361–386.
68.
TrevorsG. J.MuisK. R.PekrunR.SinatraG. M.WinneP. H. (2016). Identity and epistemic emotions during knowledge revision: A potential account for the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 339–370.
69.
TyngC. M.AminH. U.SaadM. N.MalikA. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1454.
70.
Van BockstaeleB.VerschuereB.TibboelH.De HouwerJ.CrombezG.KosterE. H. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 682–721.
71.
van den BroekP. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453–456.
72.
van den BroekP.KendeouP. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351.
73.
VanlessenN.RossiV.De RaedtR.PourtoisG. (2014). Feeling happy enhances early spatial encoding of peripheral information automatically: Electrophysiological time-course and neural sources. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 951–969.
74.
van LoonM. H.DunloskyJ.Van GogT.Van MerriënboerJ. J.De BruinA. B. (2015). Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 39–48.
75.
Ventura-BortC.LöwA.WendtJ.MoltóJ.PoyR.DolcosF.. . . WeymarM. (2016). Binding neutral information to emotional contexts: Brain dynamics of long-term recognition memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 234–247.
76.
VosoughiS.RoyD.AralS. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.
77.
WadlingerH. A.IsaacowitzD. M. (2006). Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 87–99.
WeeksB. E.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2019). What’s next? Six observations for the future of political misinformation research. American Behavioral Scientist. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878236
80.
WhitmerA. J.GotlibI. H. (2013). An attentional scope model of rumination. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1036–1061.
81.
YegiyanN. S.YonelinasA. P. (2011). Encoding details: Positive emotion leads to memory broadening. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1255–1262.
82.
YiendJ. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 3–47.
83.
ZolloF.NovakP. K.Del VicarioM.BessiA.MozetičI.ScalaA.. . . QuattrociocchiW. (2015). Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10(9), Article e0138740.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
