This study investigated to what extent humans can encode spatial relations between different surfaces (i.e., floor, walls, and ceiling) in a three-dimensional (3D) space and extend their headings on the floor to other surfaces when locomoting to walls (pitch 90°) and the ceiling (pitch 180°). In immersive virtual reality environments, participants first learned a layout of objects on the ground. They then navigated to testing planes: south (or north) walls facing Up, or the ceiling via walls facing North (or South). Participants locomoted to the walls with pitch rotations indicated by visual and idiothetic cues (Experiment 1) and only by visual cues (Experiment 2) and to the ceiling with visual pitch rotations only (Experiment 3). Using the memory of objects’ locations, they either reproduced the object layout on the testing plane or did a Judgements of Relative Direction (JRD) task (“imagine standing at object A, facing B, point to C”) with imagined headings of south and north on the ground. The results showed that participants who locomoted onto the wall with idiothetic cues showed a better performance in JRD for an imagined heading from which their physical heading was extended (e.g., imagined heading of North at the north wall). In addition, the participants who reproduced the layout of objects on the ceiling from a perspective extended from the ground also showed a sensorimotor alignment effect predicted by an extended heading. These results indicate that humans encode spatial relations between different surfaces and extend headings via pitch rotations three-dimensionally, especially with idiothetic cues.
CaltonJ. L.TaubeJ. S. (2005). Degradation of head direction cell activity during inverted locomotion. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(9), 2420–2428. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3511-04.2005
2.
ChrastilE. R.WarrenW. H. (2013). Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: Acquisition of survey knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1520–1537. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000082
3.
CrowtherH. L.LewA. R.WhitakerC. J. (2000). The development of beacon use for spatial orientation in 6–8.5-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(00)00028-X
4.
DuY.MahdiN.PaulB.SpetchM. L. (2016). Cue salience influences the use of height cues in reorientation in pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 273–280.
5.
DuY.SpetchM. L.MouW. (2016). Look up: Human adults use vertical height cues in reorientation. Memory & Cognition, 44(8), 1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0627-6
6.
EastonR. D.ShollM. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 483–500.
7.
FarrellM. J.RobertsonI. H. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.227
8.
FarrellM. J.ThomsonJ. A. (1998). Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A(3), 637–655.
9.
FengJ.SpenceI.PrattJ. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.x
10.
FinkelsteinA.DerdikmanD.RubinA.FoersterJ. N.LasL.UlanovskyN. (2015). Three-dimensional head-direction coding in the bat brain. Nature, 517(7533), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14031
11.
Flores-AbreuI. N.HurlyT. A.AingeJ. A.HealyS. D. (2014). Three-dimensional space: Locomotory style explains memory differences in rats and hummingbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 281, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0301
GallistelC. R. (1990). The organization of learning. The MIT Press.
14.
GreenauerN.WallerD. (2010). Micro- and macroreference frames: Specifying the relations between spatial categories in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 938–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019647
15.
HanX.BeckerS. (2014). One spatial map or many? Spatial coding of connected environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035259
16.
HegartyM.WallerD. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective- taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191.
IndovinaI.MaffeiV.MazzarellaE.SulpizioV.GalatiG.LacquanitiF. (2016). Path integration in 3D from visual motion cues: A human fMRI study. NeuroImage, 142, 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.008
20.
JefferyK. J.JovalekicA.VerriotisM.HaymanR. (2013). Navigating in a three-dimensional world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 523–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002476
21.
JefferyK. J.WilsonJ. J.CasaliG.HaymanR. M. (2015). Neural encoding of large-scale three-dimensional space—Properties and constraints. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00927
22.
KellyJ. W.AvraamidesM. N.LoomisJ. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1092
23.
KellyJ. W.McNamaraT. P. (2008). Spatial memories of virtual environments: How egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.322
KellyJ. W.SiegelZ. D.SjolundL. A.AvraamidesM. N. (2018). Selection of macroreference frames in spatial memory. Memory and Cognition, 46, 1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0836-2
26.
KlatzkyR. L.LoomisJ. M.BeallA. C.ChanceS. S.GolledgeR. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9(4), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00058
27.
LaurensJ.KimB.DickmanJ. D.AngelakiD. E. (2016). Gravity orientation tuning in macaque anterior thalamus. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 1566–1568. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4423
28.
LeiX.MouW.ZhangL. (2020). Developing global spatial representations through across-boundary navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000716
LevineM.JankovicI. N.PalijM. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 157–175.
31.
MarchetteS. A.VassL. K.RyanJ.EpsteinR. A. (2014). Anchoring the neural compass: Coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1598–1606. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3834
MontelloD. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In FrankA. U.CampariI. (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS COSIT (pp. 312–321). Springer-Verlag.
34.
MouW.McNamaraT. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.162
35.
MouW.McNamaraT. P.ValiquetteC. M.RumpB. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.142
36.
MouW.WangL. (2015). Piloting and path integration within and across boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000032
37.
NardiD.NewcombeN. S.ShipleyT. F. (2011). The world is not flat: Can people reorient using slope?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021614
38.
PageH. J. I.WilsonJ. J.JefferyK. J. (2018). A dual-axis rotation rule for updating the head direction cell reference frame during movement in three dimensions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 119, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00501.2017
39.
RieckeB. E.CunninghamD. W.BülthoffH. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research, 71(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0085-z
40.
RieckeB. E.McNamaraT. P. (2017). Where you are affects what you can easily imagines environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking. Cognition, 169, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.014
41.
RieserJ. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1157
42.
RuddleR. A.VolkovaE.BülthoffH. H. (2011). Walking improves your cognitive map in environments that are large-scale and large in extent. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1970378.1970384
43.
SheltonA. L.MarchetteS. A. (2010). Where do you think you are? Effects of conceptual current position on spatial memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018713
44.
SheltonA. L.McNamaraT. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0758
45.
ShineJ. P.Valdés-HerreraJ. P.HegartyM.WolbersT. (2016). The human retrosplenial cortex and thalamus code head direction in a global reference frame. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 6371–6381. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1268-15.2016
46.
SimonsD. J.LevinD. T. (1997). Change blindness. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(7), 261–267.
47.
StackmanR. W.TullmanM. L.TaubeJ. S. (2000). Maintenance of rat head direction cell firing during locomotion in the vertical plane. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 393–405.
TaubeJ. S.WangS. S.KimS. Y.FrohardtR. J. (2013). Updating of the spatial reference frame of head direction cells in response to locomotion in the vertical plane. Journal of Neurophysiology, 109, 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00239.2012
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
52.
WallerD.LoomisJ. M.HaunD. B. M. (2004). Body based enhanced knowledge of directions in large-scale environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 157–163.
53.
WallerD.MontelloD. R.RichardsonA. E.HegartyM. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1051
WangR. F. (2017). Spatial updating and common misinterpretations of spatial reference frames. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17, 222–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2017.1304394
56.
WangR. F.BrockmoleJ. R. (2003). Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 981–986. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196562
57.
ZhangL.MouW. (2019). Selective resetting position and heading estimations while driving in a large-scale immersive virtual environment. Experimental Brain Research, 237, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5417-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
