Spatial anxiety, a domain-specific anxiety related to spatial processing, has been shown to impair navigation and spatial performance. However, its relationship with reorientation tasks remains underexplored. This study examined whether spatial anxiety predicts performance on slope-based reorientation tasks and investigated the role of working memory (WM), spatial reasoning, and sex in this relationship. Seventy-four blindfolded participants completed two tasks in a small-scale environment: a Perceptual task, requiring the identification of the uphill direction, and a Memory task, involving the recall of a target object’s location. Spatial anxiety, WM, spatial reasoning, and general reading ability were assessed. Results revealed that spatial anxiety significantly predicted poorer performance on the Perceptual task, with higher spatial anxiety associated with greater errors and faster reaction times. WM positively predicted performance in the Perceptual task, suggesting its role in supporting spatial updating during blindfolded navigation. No significant relationships between spatial anxiety or WM and performance on the Memory task were observed. Residualized regression analyses showed that the predictive power of spatial anxiety on Perceptual task performance remained significant after controlling for general reading ability and sex, but diminished when accounting for WM and spatial reasoning. Future research should explore real-time measures of anxiety and employ more diverse samples to better understand the interplay between cognitive and emotional factors in navigation.
Alvarez-VargasD.AbadC.PrudenS. M. (2020). Spatial anxiety mediates the sex difference in adult mental rotation test performance. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00231-8
ArrighiL.HausmannM. (2022). Spatial anxiety and self-confidence mediate sex/gender differences in mental rotation. Learning & Memory, 29(9), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053596.122
4.
BeilockS. L.DeCaroM. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.938
5.
BlackerK. J.WeisbergS. M.NewcombeN. S.CourtneyS. M. (2017). Keeping track of where we are: Spatial working memory in navigation. Visual Cognition, 25(7–8), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1322652
6.
ChatterjeeA. (2008). The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082886
ChristieG. J.CookC. M.WardB. J.TataM. S.SutherlandJ.SutherlandR. J.SaucierD. M. (2013). Mental rotation ability is correlated with spatial but not verbal working memory performance and P300 amplitude in males. PLoS One, 8(2), e57390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057390
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Publishers.
10.
DakerR. J.GattasS. U.SokolowskiH. M.GreenA. E.LyonsI. M. (2021). First-year students’ math anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of math ability. npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00095-7
11.
DeCaroM. S.ThomasR. D.AlbertN. B.BeilockS. L. (2011). Choking under pressure: Multiple routes to skill failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023466
12.
DunhamD. W.SchöneH. (1984). Substrate slope and orientation in a land hermit crab, Coenobita clypeatus (Decapoda, Coenobitidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 154, 511–513.
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
14.
FrickA.HansenM. A.NewcombeN. S. (2013). Development of mental rotation in 3- to 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 28, 386–399. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.06.002
15.
HeC.HegartyM. (2020). How anxiety and growth mindset are linked to navigation ability:Impacts of exploration and GPS use. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101475
16.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684
17.
HermerL.SpelkeE. S. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370(6484), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/370057a0
18.
HolmesC. A.NardiD.NewcombeN. S.WeisbergS. M. (2015). Children’s use of slope to guide navigation: Sex differences relate to spontaneous slope perception. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 15(3), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2015.1015131
19.
HundA.MinarikJ. L. (2006). Getting from here to there: Spatial anxiety, wayfinding strategies, direction type, and wayfinding efficiency. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 6, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1207.s15427633scc0603_1
20.
IshikawaT.MontelloD. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003
21.
JonesG.MackenB. (2015). Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition, 144, 1–13.
22.
JovalekicA.HaymanR.BecaresN.ReidH.ThomasG.WilsonJ.JefferyK. (2011). Horizontal biases in rats’ use of three-dimensional space. Behavioral Brain Research, 222(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.02.035
23.
JulianJ. B.KeinathA. T.MarchetteS. A.EpsteinR. A. (2018). The neurocognitive basis of spatial reorientation. Current Biology, 28(17), R1059–R1073.
24.
KellyD. M.SpetchM. L.HethC. D. (1998). Pigeons’ (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.259
25.
LabateE.PazzagliaF.HegartyM. (2014). What working memory subcomponents are needed in the acquisition of survey knowledge? Evidence from direction estimation and shortcut tasks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.007
26.
LauerJ. E.EspositoA. G.BauerP. J. (2018). Domain-specific anxiety relates to children’s math and spatial performance. Developmental Psychology, 54(11), 2126–2138. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000605
27.
LawtonC. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11–12), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544230
28.
LearmonthA. E.NadelL.NewcombeN. S. (2002). Children’s use of landmarks: Implications for modularity theory. Psychological Science, 13(4), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00461.x
29.
LevineS. C.FoleyA.LourencoS.EhrlichS.RatliffK. (2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1380
30.
LibenL. S. (1995). Educational applications of geographic information systems: A developmental psychologist’s perspective. In BarstowD. (Ed.) First national conference on the educational applications of geographic information systems (pp. 44–49). TERC.
31.
LogieR.PearsonD. (1997). The inner eye and the inner scribe of visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence from developmental fractionation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752559
32.
LyonsI. M.RamirezG.MaloneyE. A.RendinaD. N.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2018). Spatial anxiety: A novel questionnaire with subscales for measuring three aspects of spatial anxiety. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(3), 526–553. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i3.154
33.
MenegehettiC.BorellaE.CarboneE.MartinelliM.De BeniR. (2016). Environment learning using descriptions or navigation: The involvement of working memory in young and older adults. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12145
34.
MixK. S.LevineS. C.ChengY. L.YoungC.HambrickD. Z.PingR.KonstantopoulosS. (2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1206–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000182
35.
NardiD.DickinD. C.DetrichA. N.AultmanA. L.BurnsE.PellegrinoA.PriceK. M.SavageC. J.WelchJ. N.YantzR. J.HuberR. N.ShawS. T. (2024). Individual differences in proprioceptive reorientation: a study on body characteristics and Posturography. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 25(3), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2024.2403355
36.
NardiD.NewcombeN. S.ShipleyT. F. (2011). The world is not flat: Can people reorient using slope?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021614.
37.
NardiD.NewcombeN. S.ShipleyT. F. (2013). Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9
38.
NardiD.SingerK. J.PriceK. M.CarpenterS. E.BryantJ. A.HathewayM. A.JohnsonJ. N.PairitzA. K.YoungK. L.NewcombeN. S. (2021). Navigating without vision: Spontaneous use of terrain slant in outdoor place learning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 21(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2021.1916504
39.
NardiD.TwymanA. D.HoldenM. P.ClarkJ. M. (2020). Tuning in: Can humans use auditory cues for spatial reorientation?Spatial Cognition & Computation, 20(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2019.1702665
40.
NazarethA.HuangX.VoyerD.NewcombeN. (2019). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1503–1528. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01633-6
41.
NewcombeN.ShipleyT. F. (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In GeroJ. (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity (pp. 179–192). Springer.
42.
OliverA.WildschutT.ParkerM. O.WoodA. P.RedheadE. S. (2022). Induction of spatial anxiety in a virtual navigation environment. Behavior Research Methods, 55(7), 3621–3628. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01979-1
43.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1956). The child’s conception of space. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44.
RamirezG.GundersonE. A.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2012). Spatial anxiety relates to spatial abilities as a function of working memory in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 65(3), 474–487.
45.
RatliffK. R.NewcombeN. S. (2008). Reorienting when cues conflict: Evidence for an adaptive-combination view. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02239.x
46.
RichardsonA. E.MontelloD. R.HegartyM. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211566
47.
Schmitzer-TorbertN. (2007). Place and response learning in human virtual navigation: Behavioral measures and gender differences. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.277
48.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
49.
SheaD. L.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604
50.
SneiderJ. T.HamiltonD. A.Cohen-GilbertJ. E.CrowleyD. J.RossoI. M.SilveriM. M. (2015). Sex differences in spatial navigation and perception in human adolescents and emerging adults. Behavioural Processes, 111, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.015
51.
SoteloM. I.BingmanV. P.MuzioR. N. (2017). Slope-based and geometric encoding of a goal location by the terrestrial toad (rhinella arenarum). Journal of Comparative Psychology (1983), 131(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000084
52.
SovranoV. A.BisazzaA.VallortigaraG. (2002). Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition, 85(2), B51–B59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00110-5
53.
StraussE.ShermanE.M.S.SpreenO. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
54.
ThoresenJ. C.FranceletR.ColtekinA.RichterK. F.FabrikantS. I.SandiC. (2016). Not all anxious individuals get lost: Trait anxiety and mental rotation ability interact to explain performance in map-based route learning in men. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 132, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.04.008
55.
UttalD. H.MeadowN. G.TiptonE.HandL. L.AldenA. R.WarrenC.NewcombeN. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
56.
VandenbergS.KuseA. (1978). Mental rotation, a group test of 3-D spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
57.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
58.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
59.
WalkowiakS.FoulshamT.EardleyA. F. (2015). Individual differences and personality correlates of navigational performance in the virtual route learning task. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 402–410.
WeisbergS. M.NewcombeN. S. (2018). Cognitive maps: Some people make them, some people struggle. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 220–226.
62.
WilkinsonG. S.RobertsonG. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t27160-000
63.
WolbersT.HegartyM. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 138–146.
64.
WolbersT.HegartyM.BüchelC.LoomisJ. M. (2008). Spatial updating: How the brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2189
