Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We investigated how people balance cognitive constraints (switch costs) against environmental constraints (stimulus availabilities) to optimise their voluntary task switching performance and explored individual differences in their switching behaviour. Specifically, in a self-organised task-switching environment, the stimulus needed for a task repetition was delayed by a stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) that increased with each consecutive repetition until a task switch reset the SOA. As predicted, participants switched tasks when the SOA in task switches approximately matched their individual switch costs and thus they optimised local task performance. Interestingly, self-reports (confirmed by behavioural switching patterns) revealed two individual strategies: some participants (N = 34) indicated to guide their task selection behaviour based on preplanned task sequences over several trials, whereas others (N = 42) indicated to primarily decide on a trial-by-trial basis whether to switch or to repeat tasks. Exploration of switching behaviour based on the two strategy groups revealed additional insights into how people achieved adaptive task selection behaviour in this task environment. Overall, the present findings suggest that individuals select tasks with the aim of improving task performance when dealing with multiple task requirements, but they differ in their preferred individual task selection strategies.

Keywords

Voluntary task switching switch costs multitasking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

(1990). The adaptive character of thought. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Arrington

C. M.

(2008). The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 991–997.

Arrington

C. M.

Logan

G. D.

(2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–615.

Arrington

C. M.

Logan

G. D.

(2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(4), 683–702.

Arrington

C. M.

Weaver

S. M.

(2015). Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 664–679.

Braun

D. A.

Arrington

C. M.

(2018). Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 82, 54–64.

Brüning

Manzey

(2018). Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: Are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict? Psychological Research, 82(1), 92–108.

Brüning

Reissland

Manzey

(2020). Individual preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: Exploring the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of response organization. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01291-7

Carlson

R. A.

Stevenson

L. M.

(2002). Temporal tuning in the acquisition o cognitive skill. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 759–765.

10.

Chater

Oaksford

(1999). Ten years of the rational analysis of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(2), 57–65.

11.

Clarke

A. D.

Irons

J. L.

James

Leber

A. B.

Hunt

A. R.

(2020). Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820929190

12.

Demanet

Verbruggen

Liefooghe

Vandierendonck

(2010). Voluntary task switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behaviour. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 387–393.

13.

Dreisbach

Fröber

(2019). On how to be flexible (or not): Modulation of the stability-flexibility balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 3–9.

14.

Ericsson

K. A.

Simon

H. A.

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251.

15.

Fischer

Gottschalk

Dreisbach

(2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 399–416.

16.

Frick

Brandimonte

M. A.

Chevalier

(2019). Voluntary task switching in children: Switching more reduces the cost of task selection. Developmental Psychology, 55(8), 1615–1625.

17.

Gelman

Stern

(2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331.

18.

Goschke

(2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance, 18, 331–355.

19.

Gray

W. D.

Sims

C. R.

W. T.

Schoelles

M. J.

(2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behaviour. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461–482.

20.

Howes

Lewis

R. L.

Vera

(2009). Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: Implications for testing theories of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 116(4), 717–751.

21.

Inzlicht

Shenhav

Olivola

C. Y.

(2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 337–349.

22.

Irons

J. L.

Leber

A. B.

(2016). Choosing attentional control settings in a dynamically changing environment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 2031–2048.

23.

Irons

J. L.

Leber

A. B.

(2018). Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(10), 1637–1654.

24.

Janssen

C. P.

Brumby

D. P.

(2015). Strategic adaptation to task characteristics, incentives, and individual differences in dual-tasking. PLOS ONE, 10(7), Article e0130009.

25.

Jersild

A. T.

(1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 1–81.

26.

Jiang

Wagner

A. D.

Egner

(2018). Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. eLife, 7, Article e39497.

27.

Jurczyk

Fröber

Dreisbach

(2019). Increasing reward prospect motivates switching to the more difficult task. Motivation Science, 5(4), 295–313.

28.

Kessler

Shencar

Meiran

(2009). Choosing to switch: Spontaneous task switching despite associated behavioural costs. Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 120–128.

29.

Kiesel

Steinhauser

Wendt

Falkenstein

Jost

Phillip

Koch

(2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874.

30.

Koch

Poljac

Müller

Kiesel

(2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583.

31.

Kushleyeva

Salvucci

D. D.

Lee

F. J.

(2005). Deciding when to switch tasks in time-critical multitasking. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(1), 41–49.

32.

Leonhard

Fernández

S. R.

Ulrich

Miller

(2011). Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: Reversed central processing order? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 115–136.

33.

Mayr

Bell

(2006). On how to be unpredictable evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17(9), 774–780.

34.

Miller

(1988). A warning about median reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 539–543.

35.

Miller

(2020). Another warning about median reaction time. https://psyarxiv.com/3q5np/

36.

Mittelstädt

Dignath

Schmidt-Ott

Kiesel

(2018). Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching. Psychological Research, 82(1), 78–91.

37.

Mittelstädt

Miller

Kiesel

(2018). Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behaviour in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment. Memory & Cognition, 46(5), 699–715.

38.

Mittelstädt

Miller

Kiesel

(2019). Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behaviour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(12), 1529–1548.

39.

Reissland

Manzey

(2016). Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance. Acta Psychologica, 168, 27–40.

40.

Rousselet

G. A.

Wilcox

R. R.

(2020). Reaction times and other skewed distributions: Problems with the mean and the median. Meta-Psychology. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/189893/1/189893.pdf

41.

Schneider

D. W.

Logan

G. D.

(2006). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: Switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 623–640.

42.

Schumacher

E. H.

Hazeltine

(2016). Hierarchical task representation: Task files and response selection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 449–454.

43.

Vandierendonck

Demanet

Liefooghe

Verbruggen

(2012). A chain-retrieval model for voluntary task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 241–283.

44.

Vogel

E. K.

Awh

(2008). How to exploit diversity for scientific gain: Using individual differences to constrain cognitive theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 171–176.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Balancing cognitive and environmental constraints when deciding to switch tasks: Exploring self-reported task-selection strategies in self-organised multitasking

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material