The present study investigated the involvement of bottom-up and top-down control in task-switching situations in which tasks are selected on a voluntary basis. We tested for indices of both types of control in the reduction in switch cost that is observed when more time is available before executing a task. Participants had to indicate their task choice overtly prior to the actual task execution, and two time intervals were manipulated: the interval between the task-execution response of the previous trial and task-indication response of the current trial and the interval between task-indication response and task-execution response of a particular trial. In Experiment 1, the length of these intervals was manipulated orthogonally, and indices for top-down and bottom-up control were observed. Concerned with the validity of these results, Experiments 2–3 additionally discouraged participants from preparing the upcoming task before their task-indication response. Indices for bottom-up control remained, but not for top-down control. The characteristics of top-down and bottom-up control in voluntary task switching and task switching in general are discussed.
AllportA., StylesE. A., & HsiehS. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In UmiltaC. & MoscovitchM. (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AltmannE. M. (2004a). Advance preparation in task switching—What work is being done?Psychological Science, 15, 616–622.
3.
AltmannE. M. (2004b). The preparation effect in task-switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153–163.
4.
ArringtonC. M. (2008). The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task-switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 991–997.
5.
ArringtonC. M., & LoganG. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610–615.
6.
ArringtonC. M., & LoganG. D. (2005). Voluntary task-switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 683–702.
7.
ArringtonC. M., & RhodesK. M. (2010). Perceptual asymmetries influence task choice: The effect of lateralized presentation of hierarchical stimuli. Laterality, 15(5), 501–513.
8.
ArringtonC. M., WeaverS. M., & PaukerR. L. (2010). Stimulus priming in task choice during voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1060–1067.
9.
ArringtonC. M., & YatesM. M. (2009). The role of attentional networks in voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 660–665.
10.
DemanetJ., De BaeneW., ArringtonK., & BrassM. (2013). Biasing free choice: The role of the rostral cingulate zone in intentional control. NeuroImage, 72, 207–213.
11.
DemanetJ., LiefoogheB., & VerbruggenF. (2011). Valence, arousal and cognitive control: A voluntary task switching study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 336.
12.
DemanetJ., VerbruggenF., LiefoogheB., & VandierendonckA. (2010). Voluntary task-switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 387–393.
13.
Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 334–338.
14.
DreisbachG., & HaiderH. (2009). How task representations guide attention: Further evidence for the shielding function of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 477–486.
15.
ForstmannB. U., BrassM., KochI., & von CramonD. Y. (2006). Voluntary selection of task sets revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 388–398.
16.
HoroufchinH., PhilippA. M., & KochI. (2011a). The dissipating task-repetition benefit in task-switching: Task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 455–472.
17.
HoroufchinH., PhilippA. M., & KochI. (2011b). Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task-switching: Disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 434–446.
18.
KieselA., SteinhauserM., WendtM., FalkensteinM., JostK., PhillipA., & KochI. (2010). Control and interference in task-switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874.
19.
LiefoogheB., DemanetJ., & VandierendonckA. (2009). Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task-switching affected by the design employed?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 850–857.
20.
LiefoogheB., DemanetJ., & VandierendonckA. (2010). Persisting activation in voluntary task switching: It all depends on the instructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 381–386.
21.
LoganG. D., & BundesenC. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599.
22.
LosS. A., & HeslenfeldD. J. (2005). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 52–72.
23.
MayrU., & BellT. (2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 9, 774–780.
24.
MayrU., & KlieglR. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124–1140.
25.
MayrU., & KlieglR. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362–372.
26.
MeiranN. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.
MonsellS. (2003). Task-switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
29.
MonsellS., & MizonG. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493–516.
30.
OrrJ. M., CarpJ., & WeissmanD. H. (2012). The influence of response conflict on voluntary task switching: A novel test of the conflict monitoring model. Psychological Research, 76(1), 60–73.
RogersR. D., & MonsellS. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
33.
SchneiderD. W., & LoganG. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343–367.
34.
SchneiderD. W., & LoganG. D. (2006). Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 145–151.
35.
SchneiderD. W., & LoganG. D. (2007). Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 370–378.
36.
SohnM.-H., & AndersonJ. R. (2001).Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 764–778.
37.
StevensM., LammertynJ., VerbruggenF., & VandierendonckA. (2006). Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 280–286.
38.
VandierendonckA., LiefoogheB., & VerbruggenF. (2010). Task-switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626.
39.
VerbruggenF., LiefoogheB., VandierendonckA., & DemanetJ. (2007). Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: A recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), 342–356.
40.
WaszakF., HommelB., & AllportA. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic S–R bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.
WeaverS. M., & ArringtonC. M. (2010). What's on your mind: The influence of the contents of working memory on choice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 726–737.
43.
WylieG., & AllportA. (2000). Task-switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212–233.
44.
YeungN. (2010). Bottom-up influences on voluntary task-switching: The elusive homunculus escapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 348–362.
45.
YeungN., & MonsellS. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455–469.
