Ageing has effects both on language and gestural communication skills. Although gesture use is similar between younger and older adults, the use of representational gestures (e.g., drawing a line with fingers on the air to indicate a road) decreases with age. This study investigates whether this change in the production of representational gestures is related to individuals’ working memory and/or mental imagery skills. We used three gesture tasks (daily activity description, story completion, and address description) to obtain spontaneous co-speech gestures from younger and older individuals (N = 60). Participants also completed the Corsi working memory task and a mental imagery task. Results showed that although the two age groups’ overall gesture frequencies were similar across the three tasks, the younger adults used relatively higher proportions of representational gestures than the older adults only in the address description task. Regardless of age, the mental imagery but not working memory score was associated with the use of representational gestures only in this task. However, the use of spatial words in the address description task did not differ between the two age groups. The mental imagery or working memory scores did not associate with the spatial word use. These findings suggest that mental imagery can play a role in gesture production. Gesture and speech production might have separate timelines in terms of being affected by the ageing process, particularly for spatial content.
AlcockK. J.KrawczykK. (2010). Individual differences in language development: Relationship with motor skill at 21 months. Developmental Science, 13(5), 677–691.
2.
AlibaliM. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 307–331.
3.
AlibaliM. W.HeathD. C.MyersH. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 169–188.
4.
AlibaliM. W.KitaS.YoungA. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613.
5.
AllenG. L. (2003). Gestures accompanying verbal route directions: Do they point to a new avenue for examining spatial representations?Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(4), 259–268.
6.
AzarZ.BackusA.ÖzyürekA. (2019). General-and language-specific factors influence reference tracking in speech and gesture in discourse. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 553–574.
7.
BaddeleyA. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.
8.
BeattieG.ShoveltonH. (2000). Iconic hand gestures and the predictability of words in context in spontaneous speech. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 473–491.
9.
BeattieG.ShoveltonH. (2002). What properties of talk are associated with the generation of spontaneous iconic hand gestures?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 403–417.
10.
BrennanS. E.GalatiA.KuhlenA. K. (2010). Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 301–344.
11.
BucciW.FreedmanN. (1978). Language and hand: The dimension of referential competence 1. Journal of Personality, 46(4), 594–622.
12.
CaponeN. C.McGregorK. K. (2004). Gesture development: A review for clinical and research practices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 173–186.
13.
ChuM.KitaS. (2011). The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 102–116.
14.
ChuM.MeyerA.FoulkesL.KitaS. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 694–709.
15.
CocksN.MorganG.KitaS. (2011). Iconic gesture and speech integration in younger and older adults. Gesture, 11(1), 24–39.
16.
CohenR. L.BorsoiD. (1996). The role of gestures in description-communication: A cross-sectional study of aging. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(1), 45–63.
17.
CooperP. V. (1990). Discourse production and normal aging: Performance on oral picture description tasks. Journal of Gerontology, 45(5), P210–P214.
18.
Di NuovoS.CastellanoS.GuarneraM. A. (2014). Mental Imagery Test. Hogrefe.
19.
DrorI. E.KosslynS. M. (1994). Mental imagery and aging. Psychology and Aging, 9(1), 90–102.
20.
EmmoreyK.TverskyB.TaylorH. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(3), 157–180.
21.
FeyereisenP.CharlotV. (2008). Are there uniform age-related changes across tasks involving inhibitory control through access, deletion, and restraint functions? A preliminary investigation. Experimental Aging Research, 34(4), 392–418.
22.
FeyereisenP.HavardI. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(2), 153–171.
23.
GillespieM.JamesA. N.FedermeierK. D.WatsonD. G. (2014). Verbal working memory predicts co-speech gesture: Evidence from individual differences. Cognition, 132(2), 174–180.
24.
GlosserG.WileyM. J.BarnoskirE. J. (1998). Gestural communication in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(1), 1–13.
25.
GöksunT.Goldin-MeadowS.NewcombeN.ShipleyT. (2013). Individual differences in mental rotation: What does gesture tell us?Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 153–162.
26.
GöksunT.ÖzerD.AkbıyıkS. (under review). Gesture in the aging brain. In MorgensternA.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Gesture in language (Invited chapter). De Gruyter Mouton.
GoldshmidtO. T.WellerL. (2000). “Talking emotions”: Gender differences in a variety of conversational contexts. Symbolic Interaction, 23(2), 117–134.
29.
GrandjeanJ.ColletteF. (2011). Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: A comparison of young and elderly participants. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 237–247.
30.
GüngenC.ErtanT.EkerE.YaşarR.EnginF. (2002). Standardize mini mental test’in Türk toplumunda hafif demans tanısında geçerlik ve güvenilirliği [Validity and Reliability of the Standard Mini Mental Test for the diagnosis of mild dementia in Turkish community]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13(4), 273–281.
31.
HadarU.ButterworthB. (1997). Iconic gestures, imagery, and word retrieval in speech. Semiotica, 115(1–2), 147–172.
32.
Helweg-LarsenM.CunninghamS. J.CarricoA.PergramA. M. (2004). To nod or not to nod: An observational study of nonverbal communication and status in female and male college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 358–361.
33.
HostetterA. B.AlibaliM. W. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7(1), 73–95.
34.
HostetterA. B.AlibaliM. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514.
35.
HostetterA. B.AlibaliM. W. (2019). Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 721–752.
36.
HostetterA. B.AlibaliM. W.BartholomewA. (2011). Gesture during mental rotation. In CarlsonL.HoelscherC.ShipleyT. F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1448–1453). Cognitive Science Society.
37.
HostetterA. B.AlibaliM. W.KitaS. (2007). I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(3), 313–336.
38.
HostetterA. B.SullivanE. L. (2011). Gesture production during spatial tasks: Its not all about difficulty. In CarlsonL.HoelscherC.ShipleyT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1965–1970). Cognitive Science Society.
39.
IsaacA.MarksD. F.RussellD. G. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery, 10(4), 23–30.
40.
IversonJ. M.Goldin-MeadowS. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367–371.
41.
IversonJ. M.ThelenE. (1999). Hand, mouth and brain. The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 19–40.
42.
JamesL. E.BurkeD. M.AustinA.HulmeE. (1998). Production and perception of “verbosity” in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13(3), 355–367.
43.
KemperS.GreinerL. H.MarquisJ. G.PrenovostK.MitznerT. L. (2001). Language decline across the life span: Findings from the nun study. Psychology and Aging, 16(2), 227.
44.
KemperS.HermanR.LianC. (2003). Age differences in sentence production. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(5), P260–P268.
45.
KemperS.ThompsonM.MarquisJ. (2001). Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. Psychology and Aging, 16(4), 600–614.
46.
KendonA. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 175–200.
47.
KitaS. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. Language and Gesture, 1, 162–185.
48.
KitaS. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 145–167.
49.
KitaS.AlibaliM. W.ChuM. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124(3), 245–266.
50.
KitaS.ÖzyürekA. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32.
51.
KraussR. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 54–54.
52.
KraussR. M.ChenY.GottesmanR. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In McNeillD. (Ed.), Language and gesture: Window into thought and action (pp. 261–283). Cambridge University Press.
53.
KraussR. M.HadarU. (1999). The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In MessingL. S.CampbellR. (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 93–116). Oxford University Press.
54.
LavergneJ.KimuraD. (1987). Hand movement asymmetry during speech: No effect of speaking topic. Neuropsychologia, 25(4), 689–693.
55.
LeeH.GayraudF.HirschF.Barkat-DefradasM. (2011, August17–21). Speech dysfluencies in normal and pathological aging: A comparison between Alzheimer patients and healthy elderly subjects [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
56.
LevinsonS. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press.
57.
McNeillD. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92(3), 350–371.
58.
McNeillD. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
59.
MelingerA.KitaS. (2007). Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 473–500.
60.
MilnerB. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272–277.
61.
MorsellaE.KraussR. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. American Journal of Psychology, 117(3), 411–424.
62.
MulderT. H.HochstenbachJ. B. H.Van HeuvelenM. J. G.Den OtterA. R. (2007). Motor imagery: The relation between age and imagery capacity. Human Movement Science, 26(2), 203–211.
63.
ÖzçalışkanŞ.AdamsonL. B.DimitrovaN. (2016). Early deictic but not other gestures predict later vocabulary in both typical development and autism. Autism, 20(6), 754–763.
64.
ÖzerD.GöksunT. (2019). Visual-spatial and verbal abilities differentially affect processing of gestural vs. spoken expressions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1703016
65.
ÖzerD.TansanM.ÖzerE. E.MalykhinaK.ChatterjeeA.GöksunT. (2017). The effects of gesture restriction on spatial language in young and elderly adults. In GunzelmannG.HowesA.TenbrinkT.DavelaarE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1471–1476). Cognitive Science Society.
66.
RauscherF. H.KraussR. M.ChenY. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–231.
67.
SalthouseT. A. (1991). Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychological Science, 2(3), 179–183.
68.
SalthouseT. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin?Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4), 507–514.
69.
ScahillR. I.FrostC.JenkinsR.WhitwellJ. L.RossorM. N.FoxN. C. (2003). A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of Neurology, 60(7), 989–994.
70.
SchubotzL. M. R.HollerJ.ÖzyürekA. (2015). Age-related differences in multi-modal audience design. Young, but not old speakers, adapt speech and gestures to their addressee’s knowledge. In FerreG.TuttonM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th GESPIN-gesture and speech in interaction conference (pp. 211–216). University of Nantes.
71.
SchubotzL. M. R.ÖzyürekA.HollerJ. (2019). Age-related differences in multimodal recipient design: Younger, but not older adults, adapt speech and co-speech gestures to common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(2), 254–271.
72.
SmithsonL.NicoladisE. (2013). Verbal memory resources predict iconic gesture use among monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 934–944.
73.
SmithsonL.NicoladisE. (2014). Lending a hand to imagery? The impact of visuospatial working memory interference upon iconic gesture production in a narrative task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(2), 247–258.
74.
SoW. C.KitaS.Goldin-MeadowS. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 115–125.
75.
TannenD. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow.
76.
TaylorH. A.TverskyB. (1996). Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(3), 371–391.
77.
TheocharopoulouF.CocksN.PringT.DipperL. T. (2015). TOT phenomena: Gesture production in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 245.
78.
ThorntonR.LightL. L. (2006). Language comprehension and production in normal aging. In BirrenJ. E.Warner SchaieK. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 262–287). Elsevier.
79.
WespR.HesseJ.KeutmannD.WheatonK. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 591–600.
80.
WuY. C.CoulsonS. (2014). Co-speech iconic gestures and visuo-spatial working memory. Acta Psychologica, 153, 39–50.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
