Older readers (aged 65+ years) of both alphabetic languages and character-based languages like Chinese read more slowly than their younger counterparts (aged 18–30 years). A possible explanation for this slowdown is that, due to age-related visual and cognitive declines, older readers have a smaller perceptual span and so acquire less information on each fixational pause. However, although aging effects on the perceptual span have been investigated for alphabetic languages, no such studies have been reported to date for character-based languages like Chinese. Accordingly, we investigated this issue in three experiments that used different gaze-contingent moving window paradigms to assess the perceptual span of young and older Chinese readers. In these experiments, text was shown either entirely as normal or normal only within a narrow region (window) comprising either the fixated word, the fixated word, and one word to its left, or the fixated word and either one or two words to its right. Characters outside these windows were replaced using a pattern mask (Experiment 1) or a visually similar character (Experiment 2), or blurred to render them unidentifiable (Experiment 3). Sentence reading times were overall longer for the older compared with the younger adults and differed systematically across display conditions. Crucially, however, the effects of display condition were essentially the same across the two age groups, indicating that the perceptual span for Chinese does not differ substantially for the older and young adults. We discuss these findings in relation to other evidence suggesting the perceptual span is preserved in older adulthood.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
2.
BallK. K.BeardB. L.RoenkerD. L.MillerR. L.GriggsD. S. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 5, 2210–2219.
3.
BalotaD. A.PollatsekA.RaynerK. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
4.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
BélangerN. N.SlatteryT. J.MayberryR. I.RaynerK. (2012). Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 23, 816–823.
7.
BriihlD.InhoffA. W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.55
8.
ChaceK. H.RaynerK.WellA. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087476
9.
CrassiniB.BrownB.BowmanK. (1988). Age-related changes in contrast sensitivity in central and peripheral retina. Perception, 17, 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1068/p170315
10.
DriegheD.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954
11.
ElliottD. B.YangK. C.WhitakerD. (1995). Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. Optometry and Vision Science, 72, 186–191.
12.
FreyA.BosseM. L. (2018). Perceptual span, visual span, and visual attention span: Three potential ways to quantify limits on visual processing during reading. Visual Cognition, 26, 412–429.
13.
GreenP.MacleodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
14.
HäikiöT.BertramR.HyönäJ.NiemiP. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.002
15.
HendersonJ. M.FerreiraF. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
16.
HilzR. L.CavoniusC. R. (1974). Functional organisation of the peripheral retina: Sensitivity to periodic stimuli. Vision Research, 14, 1333–1337.
17.
HoosainR. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 157–161.
18.
HoosainR. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in Psychology, 90, 111–130.
19.
HutzlerF.ShusterS.MarxC.HawalkaS. (2019). An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm. PLOS ONE, 14, Article e0203013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203013
20.
InhoffA. W.LiuW. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
21.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
22.
JordanT. R.AlmabrukA. A. A.GadallaE. A.McGowanV. A.WhiteS. J.AbedipourL.. . . PatersonK. B. (2014). Reading direction and the central perceptual span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0510-4
23.
JordanT. R.KurtevS.McGowanV. A.PatersonK. B. (2016). A further look at postview effects in reading: An eye-movements study of influences from the left of fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 296–307.
24.
JordanT. R.ThomasS. M.PatchingG. R. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in reading -parafoveal processing is not the only view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 900–903.
25.
KassR. E.RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 791. doi:10.2307/2291091. JSTOR 2291091
26.
KemperS.McDowdJ. (2006). Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction. Psychology and Aging, 21, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.32
27.
KennisonS. M.CliftonC. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.68
28.
KlieglR.GrabnerE.RolfsM.EngbertR. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000213
29.
LeggeG. E.AhnS. J.KlitzT. S.LuebkerA. (1997). Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Research, 37, 1999–2010.
30.
LeggeG. E.CheungS. H.YuD.ChungS. T.LeeH. W.OwensD. P. (2007). The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–15.
31.
Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese Research Team. (2008). Lexicon of common words in contemporary Chinese. The Commercial Press.
32.
LiL.LiS.XieF.ChangM.McGowanV. A.WangJ.PatersonK. B. (2019). Establishing a role for the visual complexity of linguistic stimuli in age-related reading difficulty: Evidence from eye movements during Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2626–2634.
33.
LiS.LiL.WangJ.McGowanV. A.PatersonK. B. (2018). Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers. Psychology and Aging, 33, 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000258
34.
LiX.ZangC.LiversedgeS. P.PollatsekA. (2015). The role of words in Chinese reading. In PollatsekA.RebeccaT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 232–244). Oxford University Press.
35.
LiuR.PatelB. N.KwonM. (2017). Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 8271.
36.
LiuW.AngeleB.LuoC.LiX. (2018). Beyond the leftward limit of the perceptual span: Parafoveal processing to the left of fixation in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1873–1878.
37.
LiuW.InhoffA. W.YeY.WuC. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1213
38.
McConkieG. W.RaynerK. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203972
McGowanV. A.WhiteS. J.JordanT. R.PatersonK. B. (2014). Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading:Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 740–747. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0527-8
41.
MeijerW. A.de GrootR. H.Van BoxtelM. P.Van GervenP. W.JollesJ. (2006). Verbal learning and aging: Combined effects of irrelevant speech, interstimulus interval, and education. Journals of Gerontology, 61, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.5.P285
MundI.BellR.BuchnerA. (2010). Age differences in reading with distraction: Sensory or inhibitory deficits?Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 886–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019508
44.
NasreddineZ. S.PhillipsN. A.BédirianV.CharbonneauS.WhiteheadV.CollinI.. . . ChertkowH. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 53, 695–699.
45.
PatersonK. B.McGowanV. A.JordanT. R. (2013a). Filtered text reveals adult age differences in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychology and Aging, 28, 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030350
46.
PatersonK. B.McGowanV. A.JordanT. R. (2013b). Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: Evidence from eye movements. PeerJ, 1, Article e63. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.63
47.
PatersonK. B.McGowanV. A.WhiteS. J.MalikS.AbedipourL.JordanT. R. (2014). Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English. PLOS ONE, 9, e88358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088358
48.
PollatsekA.BolozkyS.WellA. D.RaynerK. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174–180.
49.
PollatsekA.TanL. H.RaynerK. (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.607
RaynerK. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90037-8
52.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
53.
RaynerK. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
54.
RaynerK. (2014). The gaze-contingent moving window in reading: Development and review. Visual Cognition, 22, 242–258.
55.
RaynerK.CastelhanoM. S.YangJ. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014300
56.
RaynerK.CastelhanoM. S.YangJ. (2010). Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 25, 714–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019199
57.
RaynerK.ReichleE.StroudM.WilliamsC.PollatsekA. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
58.
RaynerK.SlatteryT. J.BélangerN. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 834–839. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.834
59.
RaynerK.WellA. D.PollatsekA. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 537–544. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198682
60.
RaynerK.WellA. D.PollatsekA.BerteraJ. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537–550. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204186
61.
RaynerK.YangJ.SchuettS.SlatteryT. J. (2014). The effect of foveal and parafoveal masks on the eye movements of older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 29, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036015
62.
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical Word Predictability in Chinese 18 computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
63.
RisseS. (2014). Effects of visual span on reading speed and parafoveal processing in eye movements during sentence reading. Journal of Vision, 14, 11. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.11
64.
RisseS.KlieglR. (2011). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26, 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021616
65.
RyanJ. J.SattlerJ.LopezS. (2000). Age effects on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III subtests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 311–317.
66.
SchotterE. R.AngeleB.RaynerK. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 5–35.
67.
SekulerA. B.BennettP. J.MamelakM. (2000). Effects of aging on the useful field of view. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 103–120.
68.
SperlichA.MeixnerJ.LaubrockJ. (2016). Development of the perceptual span in reading: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.007
69.
Stine-MorrowE. A.ShakeM. C.MilesJ. R.LeeK.GaoX.McConkieG. (2010). Pay now or pay later: Aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing. Psychology and Aging, 25, 168–176. doi:10.1037/a0018127
70.
TaylorH. R. (1978). Applying new design principles to the construction of an illiterate E chart. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 55, 348–351.
71.
TsaiJ. L.KlieglR.YanM. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.004
72.
VandekerckhoveJ.MatzkeD.WagenmakersE. J. (2015). Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. In BusemeyerJ.TownsendJ.WangZ. J.EidelsA. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology (pp. 300–319).
73.
VeldreA.AndrewsS. (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 703–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.826258
WangH.HeX.LeggeG. E. (2014). Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of Vision, 14, 6.
76.
WangJ.LiL.LiS.XieF.ChangM.PatersonK. B.McGowanV. A. (2018). Adult age differences in eye movements during reading: The evidence from Chinese. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73, 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw036
77.
WangJ.LiL.LiS.XieF.LiversedgeS. P.PatersonK. B. (2018). Effects of aging and text-stimulus quality on the word-frequency effect during Chinese reading. Psychology and Aging, 33, 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000259
78.
WarringtonK. L.McGowanV. A.PatersonK. B.WhiteS. J. (2018). Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1714–1729. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000543
79.
WarringtonK. L.McGowanV. A.PatersonK. B.WhiteS. J. (2019). Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychology and Aging, 34, 598–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000342
80.
WechslerD. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. Psychological Corporation.
81.
WechslerD.ChenY. H.ChenX. Y. (2002). WAIS-III Chinese version technical manual. Psychological Corporation.
82.
WhiteS. J.JohnsonR. L.LiversedgeS. P.RaynerK. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261
83.
WhitfordV.TitoneD. (2016). Eye movements and the perceptual span during first- and second-language sentence reading in bilingual older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039971
84.
WhitfordV.TitoneD. (2017). The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 32, 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000151
85.
XieF.LiL.ZhouS.WangJ.PatersonK. B.WhiteS.WarringtonK. (2019). Aging and pattern complexity effects on the visual span: Evidence from Chinese character recognition. Vision, 3, 11.
86.
YanG.ZhangQ.ZhangL.BaiX. (2013). The effect of masking materials on perceptual span in Chinese reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 36, 1317–1322.
87.
YanM.RichterE. M.ShuH.KlieglR. (2009). Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. Psychonomicbulletin & Review, 16, 561–566.
88.
YanM.RisseS.ZhouX.KlieglR. (2012). Preboundary duration modulates semantic preview benefit for word n + 1 and n + 2 in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1093–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9274-7
89.
YanM.ZhouW.ShuH.KlieglR. (2012). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026935
90.
YanM.ZhouW.ShuH.KlieglR. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038097
91.
YangJ.WangS.TongX.RaynerK. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9281-8
92.
ZangC.LiversedgeS. P.BaiX.YanG. (2011). Eye movements during Chinese reading. In GilchristI.EverlingS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 961–978). Oxford University Press.
93.
ZangC.ZhangM.BaiX.YanG.PatersonK. B.LiversedgeS. P. (2016). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1409–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1083594
94.
ZhangJ.-T.ZhangT.XueF.YuC. (2007). Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population. Investigative and Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 48, 2383–2390.
95.
ZhaoS.LiL.ChangM.XuQ.ZhangK.WangJ.PatersonK. B. (2019). Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading. Psychology and Aging, 34, 780–790.
96.
ZhouW.KlieglR.YanM. (2013). A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S51–S63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.01556.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
