Individual differences in encoding strategies and their relation to free recall dynamics were examined. Participants performed a delayed free recall task and following each list reported which strategies they may have used on the prior list. Individual differences in effective encoding strategy use were positively correlated with overall recall performance. Examining recall dynamics suggested that variation in effective encoding strategy use was associated with greater recall, particularly on non-primacy items and slightly more organised recall in terms of recall transitions. However, no differences were found for recall of items at the first serial position, in recall initiation, or in how quickly participants recalled items. Collectively, the results are consistent with the notion that effective encoding strategies increase the strength of items, resulting in a higher likelihood of recovering the items during recall. Individual differences in control processes in the form of effective encoding strategies are critically important for understanding normal variation in memory abilities.
AtkinsonR. C.ShiffrinR. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In SpenceK. W. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. II, pp. 89–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
AtkinsonR. C.ShiffrinR. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82–90.
3.
BaileyH.DunloskyJ.KaneM. J. (2008). Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1383–1390.
4.
BäumlK.-H. T.KlieglO. (2013). The critical role of retrieval processes in release from proactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 39–53.
5.
BenjaminA. S. (2008). Memory is more than just remembering: Strategic control of encoding, accessing memory, and making decisions. In BenjaminA. S.RossB. H. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Skill and strategy in memory use (Vol. 48, pp. 175–223). London, England: Academic Press.
6.
BousfieldW. A.SedgewickC. H. W. (1944). An analysis of restricted associative responses. The Journal of General Psychology, 30, 149–165.
7.
BowerG. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In GreggL. W. (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51–88). New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
CrawfordJ.StankovL. (1983). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and primacy/recency components of short-term memory. Intelligence, 7, 227–252.
9.
DelaneyP. F.KnowlesM. E. (2005). Encoding strategy changes in spacing effects in the free recall of unmixed lists. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 120–130.
10.
DunloskyJ.HertzogC. (2000). Updating knowledge about strategy effectiveness: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462–474.
11.
DunloskyJ.HertzogC. (2001). Measuring strategy production during associative learning: The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports. Memory & Cognition, 29, 247–253.
12.
DunloskyJ.KaneM. J. (2007). The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy-assessment methods. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1227–1245.
13.
FaganJ. F. (1972). Rehearsal and free recall in children of superior and average intelligence. Psychonomic Science, 28, 352–354.
14.
FriendlyM.FranklinP. E.HoffmanD.RubinD. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instruments, 14, 375–399.
15.
GoodwinC. J. (1976). Changes in primacy and recency with practice in single-trial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 119–132.
16.
HealeyM. K.CrutchleyP.KahanaM. J. (2014). Individual differences in memory search and their relation to intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1553–1569.
17.
HealeyM. K.KahanaM. J. (2014). Is memory search governed by universal principles or idiosyncratic strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 575–596.
18.
HerrmannD. J. (1987). Task appropriateness of mnemonic techniques. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 171–178.
19.
HertzogC.DunloskyJ. (2004). Aging, metacognition, and cognitive control. In RossB. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 215–251). San Diego: CA: Academic Press.
20.
HertzogC.LovdenM.LindenbergerU.SchmiedekF. (2017). Age differences in coupling of intraindividual variability in mnemonic strategies and practice-related associative recall improvements. Psychology and Aging, 6, 557–571.
21.
HertzogC.McGuireC. L.LineweaverT. T. (1998). Aging, attributions, perceived control, and strategy use in a free recall task. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 85–106.
22.
HertzogC.PriceJ.DunloskyJ. (2008). How is knowledge generate about memory encoding strategy effectiveness. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 430–445.
23.
HintzmanD. L. (2016). Is memory organized by temporal contiguity?Memory & Cognition, 44, 365–375.
24.
HornJ. L.DonaldsonG.EngstromR. (1981). Apprehension, memory, and fluid intelligence decline in adulthood. Research on Aging, 3, 33–84.
25.
HowardM. W.KahanaM. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 923–941.
26.
IndowT.ToganoK. (1970). On retrieving sequences from long-term memory. Psychological Review, 77, 317–331.
27.
KahanaM. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24, 103–109.
28.
KahanaM. J. (2017). Memory search. In ByrneJ. H. (Ed.), Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (2nd Ed., vol. 2, pp. 181–200). Oxford: Academic Press.
29.
KahanaM. J.HowardM. W.ZarombF.WingfieldA. (2002). Age dissociates recency and lag recency effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 530–540.
30.
LehmanM.MalmbergK. J. (2013). A buffer model of encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120, 155–189.
31.
MartinC. J.BoersmaF. J.CoxD. L. (1965). A classification of associative strategies in paired-associate learning. Psychonomic Science, 3, 455–456.
32.
McGillW. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanism. In LuceR. D.BushR. R.GalanterE. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York, NY: Wiley.
33.
MillerA. L.GrossM. P.UnsworthN. (2019). Individual differences in working memory capacity and long-term memory: The influence of intensity of attention to items at encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 104, 25–42.
34.
MillerA. L.UnsworthN. (2018). Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency. Memory & Cognition, 46, 1149–1163.
35.
MurdockB. B. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
NelsonT. O.NarensL. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In BowerG. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 125–173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
RaaijmakersJ. G. W.ShiffrinR. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In BowerG. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York, NY: Academic Press.
38.
ReitmanW. (1970). What does it take to remember? In NormanD. A. (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470–509). New York, NY: Academic Press.
39.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (1998). The availability and effectiveness of reported mediators in associative learning: A historical review and an experimental investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 597–614.
40.
RoedigerH. L. I. I. I.StellonC. C.TulvingE. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 174–188.
41.
RohrerD. (1996). On the relative and absolute strength of a memory trace. Memory & Cognition, 24, 188–201.
42.
RohrerD.WixtedJ. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 511–524.
43.
SahakyanL.DelaneyP. F. (2003). Can encoding differences explain the benefits of directed forgetting in the list method paradigm?Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 195–206.
44.
SahakyanL.KwapilT. R. (2018). Moving beyond summary scores: Decomposing free recall performance to understand episodic memory deficits in schizotypy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1919–1930.
45.
ShiffrinR. M. (1970). Memory search. In NormanD. A. (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 375–447). New York, NY: Academic Press.
46.
ShiffrinR. M.AtkinsonR. C. (1969). Storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory. Psychological Review, 79, 179–193.
47.
SpillersG. J.UnsworthN. (2011a). Variation in working memory capacity and temporal-contextual retrieval from episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1532–1539.
48.
SpillersG. J.UnsworthN. (2011b). Are the costs of directed forgetting due to failures of sampling or recovery? Exploring the dynamics of recall in list-method directed forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 39, 403–411.
49.
Turley-AmesK. J.WhitfieldM. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 446–468.
50.
UnsworthN. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: Examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1020–1034.
51.
UnsworthN. (2009). Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: A latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall. Memory & Cognition, 37, 837–849.
52.
UnsworthN. (2015). The influence of encoding manipulations on the dynamics of free recall. Memory & Cognition, 43, 60–69.
53.
UnsworthN. (2016). Working memory capacity and recall from long-term memory: Examining the influences of encoding strategies, study time allocation, search efficiency, and monitoring abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 50–61.
UnsworthN.BrewerG. A.SpillersG. J. (2011). Inter- and Intra individual variation in immediate free recall: An examination of serial position functions and recall initiation strategies. Memory, 19, 67–82.
56.
UnsworthN.BrewerG. A.SpillersG. J. (2013). Focusing the search: Proactive and retroactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1742–1756.
57.
UnsworthN.EngleR. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.
58.
UnsworthN.HeitzR. P.SchrockJ. C.EngleR. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.
59.
UnsworthN.RedickT. S.HeitzR. P.BroadwayJ.EngleR. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17, 635–654.
60.
UnsworthN.SpillersG. J. (2010). Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: The contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 200–205.
61.
UnsworthN.SpillersG. J.BrewerG. A. (2010). The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: An individual differences analysis of immediate free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 240–247.
62.
WixtedJ. T.RohrerD. (1993). Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1024–1039.
63.
WixtedJ. T.RohrerD. (1994). Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 89–106.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
