We examined the relationship between endogenous rhythms, auditory and visual cues, and body movement in the temporal coordination of duet singers. Sixteen pairs of experienced vocalists sang a familiar melody in Solo and two Duet conditions. Vocalists sang together in Unison (simultaneously producing identical pitches) and Round Duet conditions (one vocalist, the Follower, producing pitches at an eight-tone delay from their partner, the Leader) while facing Inward (full visual cues) and Outward (reduced visual cues). Larger tempo differences in partners’ spontaneous (temporally unconstrained) Solo performances were associated with larger asynchrony in Duet performances, consistent with coupling predictions for oscillators with similar natural frequencies. Vocalists were slightly but consistently more synchronous in Duets when facing their partner (Inward) than when facing Outward; Unison and Round performances were equally synchronous. The greater difficulty of Rounds production was evidenced in vocalists’ slower performance rates and more variable head movements; Followers directed their head gaze away from their partner and used bobbing head movements to mark the musical beat. The strength of Followers’ head movements corresponded to the amount of tone onset asynchrony with their partners, indicating a strong association between timing and movement under increased attentional and working memory demands in music performance.
BarnettL.SethA. K. (2014). The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 223, 50–68.
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
3.
BurgerB.ThompsonM. R.LuckG.SaarikallioS. H.ToiviainenP. (2014). Hunting for the beat in the body: On period and phase locking in music-induced movement. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 903. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00903
4.
BurgerB.ThompsonM. R.SaarikallioS.LuckG.ToiviainenP. (2013). Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 183. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00183
5.
ChangA.LivingstoneS. R.BosnyakD. J.TrainorL. (2017). Body sway reflects leadership in joint music performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, E4134–E4141. doi:10.1073/pnas.1617657114
6.
CohenM. L. (2009). Choral singing and prison inmates: Influences of performing in a prison choir. Journal of Correctional Education, 60, 52–65.
7.
DahlinC. R.BenedictL. (2013). Angry birds need not apply: A perspective on the flexible form and multifunctionality of avian vocal duets. Ethology, 120, 1–10.
8.
Dalla BellaS.BerkowskaM.SowinskiJ. (2015). Moving to the beat and singing are linked in humans. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 663. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00663
9.
D’AmarioS.DaffernH.BailesF. (2018). Synchronization in singing duo performances: The roles of visual contact and leadership instruction. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1208. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01208
10.
DaughertyJ. F. (1999). Spacing, formation, and choral sound: Preferences and perceptions of auditors and choristers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 224–238.
11.
DaughertyJ. F. (2003). Choir spacing and formation: Choral sound preferences in random, synergistic, and gender-specific chamber choir placements. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 1, 48–59.
12.
DavidsonJ. W. (2012). Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo and duo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies. Psychology of Music, 40, 595–633.
13.
DavidsonJ. W.GoodJ. M. (2002). Social and musical coordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music, 30, 186–201.
14.
DeanR.DunsmuirW. T. (2016). Dangers and uses of cross-correlation in analyzing time series in perception, performance, movement, and neuroscience: The importance of constructing transfer function autoregressive models. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 783–802.
15.
de CheveignéA. H.KawaharaH. (2002). YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1917–1930.
16.
DellG. S.BurgerL. K.SvecW. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-147.
17.
EkholmE. (2000). The effect of singing mode and seating arrangement on choral blend and overall choral sound. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 123135.
18.
FarabaughS. M. (1982). The ecological and social significance of duetting. In KroodsmaD. E.MillerE. H. (Eds.), Acoustic communication in birds (pp. 85–124). New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
GabrielssonA. (1999). The performance of music. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 501–602). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
GibbonJ.ChurchR. M.MeckW. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 52–77.
21.
GoeblW.PalmerC. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception, 26, 427–438.
22.
HallM. L. (2004). A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 415–430.
23.
HasegawaA.OkanoyaK.HasegawaT.SekiY. (2011). Rhythmic synchronization tapping to an audio-visual metronome in budgerigars. Scientific Reports, 1, 120. doi:10.1038/srep00120
24.
HatsopoulosN. G.WarrenW. H.Jr. (1996). Resonance tuning in rhythmic arm movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 3-14.
25.
HoveM. J.RisenJ. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27, 949–961.
26.
HutchinsS. M.PeretzI. (2012). A frog in your throat or in your ear? Searching for the causes of poor singing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 76–97.
27.
JanataP.TomicS. T.HabermanJ. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 54–75.
28.
JungersM. K.PalmerC.SpeerS. R. (2002). Time after time: The coordinating influence of tempo in music and speech. Cognitive Processing, 1, 21–35.
29.
KawaseS. (2014a). Assignment of leadership role changes performers’ gaze during piano duo performances. Ecological Psychology, 26, 198–215.
30.
KawaseS. (2014b). Gazing behavior and coordination during piano duo performance. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 527–540.
31.
KelsoJ. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32.
KelsoJ. A. S.TullerB. (1984). Converging evidence in support of common dynamical principles for speech and movement coordination. American Journal of Physiology, 246, R928–R935.
33.
KirschnerS.TomaselloM. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 354–364.
34.
KuglerP. N.TurveyM. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
LoehrJ. D.KourtisD.VesperC.SebanzN.KnoblichG. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1049–1061.
37.
LoehrJ. D.LargeE. W.PalmerC. (2011). Temporal coordination and adaptation to rate change in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1292–1309.
38.
LoehrJ. D.PalmerC. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2153–2167.
39.
MacKayD. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
40.
ManningF.SchutzM. (2013). “Moving to the beat” improves timing perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1133–1139.
41.
MathiasB.GehringW. J.PalmerC. (2016). Auditory N1 reveals planning and monitoring processes during music performance. Psychophysiology, 54, 235–247.
42.
MathiasB.PfordresherP. Q.PalmerC. (2015). Context and meter enhance long-range planning in music performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1040. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01040
43.
McAuleyJ. D.JonesM. R.HolubS.JohnstonH. M.MillerN. S. (2006). The time of our lives: Life span development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 348–367.
MuellerV.LindenbergerU. (2011). Cardiac and respiratory patterns synchronize between persons during choir singing. PLoS ONE, 6, e24893. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024893
46.
MürbeD.PabstF.HofmannG.SundbergJ. (2002). Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to singers’ pitch control. Journal of Voice, 16, 44–51.
47.
NettlB. (2000). An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. In WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 463–472). Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
PalmerC. (2013). Music performance: Movement and coordination. In DeutschD. (Ed.), Psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 405–422). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49.
PalmerC.KoopmansE.LoehrJ. D.CarterC. (2009). Movement-related feedback and temporal accuracy in clarinet performance. Music Perception, 26, 439–449.
PalmerC.ZammA. (2017). Interactions in ensemble music performance: Empirical and mathematical accounts. In LessaffreM.LemanM.MaesP.-J. (Eds.), Routledge companion to embodied music interaction (pp. 370–379). London, England: Routledge Press.
52.
ParkerE. C. (2010). Exploring student experiences of belonging within an urban high school choral ensemble: An action research study. Music Education Research, 12, 339–352.
53.
PatelA. D. (2008). Music, language and the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
PatelA. D.IversenJ. R.BregmanM. R.SchulzI. (2009). Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal. Current Biology, 19, 827–830.
55.
PecenkaN.KellerP. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 505–515.
56.
PfordresherP. Q.BrownS. (2007). Poor-pitch singing in the absence of “tone deafness.”Music Perception, 25, 95–115.
57.
PfordresherP. Q.MantellJ. T. (2014). Singing with yourself: Evidence for an inverse modeling account of poor-pitch singing. Cognitive Psychology, 70, 31–57.
58.
PfordresherP. Q.PalmerC. (2006). Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 362–376.
59.
RamsayJ.O.SilvermanB.W. (2005). Functional data analysis (Ed 2). New York, NY: Springer.
60.
RabinowitchT.-C.Knafo-NoamA. (2015). Synchronous rhythmic interaction enhances children’s perceived similarity and closeness towards each other. PLoS ONE, 10, e0120878. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120878
61.
ReedK. J. (2002). Music therapy treatment groups for mentally disordered offenders in a state hospital setting. Music Therapy Perspectives, 20, 98–104.
62.
StokesA. W.WilliamsH. W. (1968). Antiphonal calling in quail. Auk, 85, 83–89.
63.
StrogatzS. H. (2003). Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe. New York, NY: Hyperion.
64.
SuY.-H.PöppelE. (2012). Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences. Psychological Research, 76, 373–382.
65.
TernströmS. (1999). Preferred self-to-other ratios in choir singing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3563–3574.
66.
TernströmS.JersH.NixJ. (2014). Group and ensemble vocal music. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 1, pp. 581–593). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
67.
ThompsonW. F.RussoF. A. (2007). Facing the music. Psychological Science, 18, 756–757.
68.
ToiviainenP.LuckG.ThompsonM. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28, 59–70.
69.
WelchG. F. (1985). A schema theory of how children learn to sing in tune. Psychology of Music, 13, 3–18.
70.
WilliamonA.DavidsonJ. W. (2002). Exploring co-performer communication. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 53–72.
71.
WingA. M.EndoS.BradburyA.VorbergD. (2014). Optimal feedback correction in string quartet synchronization. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11, 20131125. doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.1125
72.
WingA. M.KristoffersonA. B. (1973). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 5–12.
73.
ZammA.PfordresherP. Q.PalmerC. (2015). Temporal coordination in joint music performance: Effects of endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 607–615.
74.
ZammA.WellmanC.PalmerC. (2016). Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 42, 611–616.
