A selection of recent sociological literature dealing with bioethics, concentrating particularly on its interface with research ethics, is reviewed to reveal that the two disciplines of bioethics and sociology have tendencies to approach subject matters from opposed perspectives. These differences in approach have now been generally recognized, accepted and accommodated by proponents of both disciplines. A turning point in the relationship between the two disciplines may have been reached which augers greater mutual respect, appreciation and even learning.
StrausR. The nature and status of medical sociology. Am Sociol Rev1957; 22: 200–4.
2.
De VriesR. How can we help? From ‘sociology in’ to ‘sociology of’ bioethics. J Law Med Ethics2003; 32: 279–92.
3.
De VriesRTurnerLOrfaliKBoskC. Sociol science and bioethics: the way forward. Sociol Hlth & Illness2006; 28(6): 665–77.
4.
HaimesE. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics2002; 16(2): 89–113.
5.
LopezJ. How sociology can save bioethics. may be. Sociol Hlth Illness2004; 26(7): 875–896.
HaimesE. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics2002; 16(2): 89–113.
18.
MolewijkA. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Hlth Care Anal2003; 11: 69–92.
19.
EdwardsJ. Explicit connections: ethnographic enquiry in northwest England, in Technologies of procreation. EdwardsJ, eds. Manchester University Press: Manchester, 1993.
CorriganOP. Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. Sociol Hlth Illness2003; 25(3): 768–92.
22.
FisherJA. Co-ordinating ‘ethical’ clinical trials: the role of research coordinators in the contract research industry. Sociol Hlth Illness2006; 28(6): 678–94.
23.
EasterMMHendersonGEDavisAMChurchillLRKingNMP. The many meanings of care in medical research. Socio Hlth & Illness2006; 28(6): 695–712.
24.
NelsonJL. Moral teachings from unexpected quarters: lessons for bioethics from the social sciences and managed care. Hastings Center Report2000; 30(1): 12–7.
25.
McDonnellOAllisonJ. From biopolitics to bioethics: church, state, medicine and assisted reproductive technology in Ireland. Sociol Hlth Illness2006; 28(6): 817–37.
26.
BusbyH. Biobanks, bioethics and concepts of donated blood in the UK. Sociol Hlth Illness2006; 28(6): 850–65.
27.
HoeyerK. The power of ethics: a case study from Sweden on the social life of moral concerns in policy processes. Sociol Hlth Illness2006; 28(6): 785–801.
28.
EvansJH. Playing God? Human genetic engineering and the rationalisation of public bioethical debate. Chicago: Chicago University Press2002.
29.
ImberJB. Medical publicity before bioethics: nineteenth century illustrations of twentieth century dilemmas. In De VriesRSubediJ, eds, Bioethics and society: constructing the ethical enterprise. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1998.
30.
DingwallR. Bioethics, in Genetics and Society. PilnickA ed. Open University Press: Buckingham, 2002.
31.
HaimesEWilliamsR. Sociology, ethics, and the priority of the particular: learning from a case study of genetic deliberations. Br J Sociol2007; 58(3): 457–76.
