In the 1990s, institutional research ethics boards (REBs) impacted the relationship between researchers and their participants by formalizing the ethics requirements to conduct research involving human subjects. While exceptions are made in some ethics policies for research that crosses international borders — for example, where obtaining written consent is not culturally acceptable — there are no such exceptions for research that crosses interdisciplinary domains. Consequently, when conducting anthropological fieldwork in a Canadian clinical setting, the requirements of the standardized ethics policy proves to mesh poorly with the ethnographic and general anthropological approach to research, distorting the process and meaning of obtaining informant consent in the anthropological sense. This article documents one neophyte ethnographer's complicated journey into the land of the REB, raising some important questions about the audit-type nature of the ethics review process and the potential exile of ethnography that may result.
American Anthropological Association (2007 ) American Anthropological Association, Arlington, Virginia, URL (consulted 25 April 2007): http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ethics.htm
2.
Amit, V. (2000) `The University as Panopticon: Moral Claims and Attacks on Academic Freedom', in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, pp. 215-35. London and New York: Routledge.
3.
Casper, M.J. (1997) `Feminist Politics and Fetal Surgery: Adventures of a Research Cowgirl on the Reproductive Frontier', Feminist Studies23(2): 232-62.
4.
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA, and London: University of California Press .
5.
Data Protection Act (1998) URL (consulted 21 July 2007): http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/19980029.htm
6.
Diamond, M. (1998) `Intersexuality: Recommendations for Management' , Archives of Sexual Behavior27(6): 634-41.
7.
Diamond, M. and Keith Sigmundson, H. (1997) `Management of Intersexuality: Guidelines for Dealing with Persons with Ambiguous Genitalia', Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine151(3): 298-304.
8.
Dreger, A.D. (ed.) (1999) Intersex in the Age of Ethics. Maryland, MDUniversity Publishing Group.
9.
Fluehr-Lobban, C. (ed.) (1991) Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for a NeW Era. Philadelphia, PN: University of Pennsylvania Press .
10.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
11.
Gremillion, H. (2003) Feeding Anorexia: Gender and PoWer at a Treatment Center. Durham, MD, and London: Duke University Press.
12.
Iversen, A., Lidell, K., Fear, N., Hotopf, M. and Wessely, S. (2006) `Consent, Confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act', British Medical Journal332: 165-9.
13.
Kessler, S.J. (1998) Lessons from the Intersexed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
Kleinman, A. (1995) Writing at the Margin: Discourse BetWeen Anthropology and Medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Luhrmann, T.M. (2001) Of TWo Minds: The GroWing Disorder in American Psychiatry. New York: Alfred A. Knoff Publishers.
16.
Nader, L. (1972) `Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained From Studying "Up"', in D. Hymes (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, pp. 284-311. New York: Pantheon Books.
17.
Palys, T.S. (1996) `The Ethics of Ethics: Comments Regarding the Tri-Council Working Group's March 1996 Draft Code of Conduct for Research Involving Humans' , URL (consulted 24 July 2008): http://www.sfu.ca/~palys.codecomm.htm
18.
Pels, P. (1999) `Professions of Duplexity: A Prehistory of Ethical Conduct in Anthropology', Current Anthropology40(2): 101-36.
19.
Redsell, S.A. and Cheater, F.M. (2001) `The Data Protection Act (1998): Implications for Health Researchers', Journal of Advanced Nursing35(4): 508-13.
20.
Roberts, L.W. (2002) `Ethics and Mental Illness Research', Psychiatry Clinical of North America25: 525-45.
21.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (1997) `Policy: A New Field of Anthropology', in C. Shore and S. Wright (eds) The Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and PoWer, pp. 3-34. London and New York: Routledge.
22.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (1999) `Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute5: 557-75.
23.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (2000) `Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education', in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, pp. 57-89. London and New York : Routledge.
24.
Strobl, J., Cave, E. and Walley, T. (2000) `Data Protection Legislation: Interpretation and Barriers to Research', British Medical Journal321: 890-2.
25.
Strathern, M. (ed.) (2000a) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.
26.
Strathern, M. (2000b) `Introduction: New Accountabilities', in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, pp. 1-18. London and New York: Routledge .
27.
Strathern, M. (2000c) `Afterword: Accountability... and Ethnography' , in M. Strathern (ed.) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, pp. 279-304. London and New York : Routledge.
28.
Timmermans, S. (1995) `Cui Bono? Institutional Review Board Ethics and Ethnographic Research', Studies in Symbolic Interaction19: 153-73.
29.
Tri-Council Policy Statement Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans ( 1998) Catalogue No.: MR21-18/1998 E. Public Works and Government Services Canada, URL (consulted 2003): http://www.nserc.ca
30.
Van Den Hoonaard, W.C. (2001) `Is Research-Ethics Review a Moral Panic?', The Canadian RevieW of Sociology and Anthropology38(1): 19-36.
31.
Wax, M.L. (1980) `Paradoxes of "Consent" to the Practice of Fieldwork' , Social Problems (Issue on Fieldwork and Ethics)27(3): 272-83.
32.
Young, A. (1995) The Harmony of Illusions: Inventing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
