A Study of the Influence of Music on Audiences’ Cognition of Animation

Abstract

How do animation directors and music composers integrate personal creativity and expression into their work, and how do audiences understand and appreciate it as being important and worthy of discussion? This study explores the influence of music on audiences’ cognition of animation by using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Scholars specializing in aesthetics and music have conducted much research on music aesthetics and music itself. In recent years, further studies on music and film have also been carried out. However, there is a lack of research regarding audiences’ cognition of music in animation. This study focuses on the popular form of sand animation and provides insights into audiences’ cognition differences and preferences in order to uncover the core factors. The findings are that: (1) the audience perceived more consistent and subtle differences in the use of musical instruments, rhythm cadence and video–audio fit; there were also obvious differences in the perceptions of vocal skills, performance skills and musical style as well as emotional transmission; (2) three aspects of the audiences’ evaluation of an animation were affected by music: creativity, cultural meaning and preferences. The seven elements that constitute animation music (use of orchestration, vocal skills, musical style, rhythm cadence, performance techniques, emotional transmission and video–audio fit) exerted varying degrees of influence on the audiences’ evaluation of the animation film. Amongst these, video–audio fit was found to be the most important element, as it simultaneously affected the audiences’ evaluation in terms of creativity, cultural meaning and preferences; (3) audiences of different ages and professional backgrounds showed significant differences in evaluating animation films in terms of creativity, culture and preference; and (4) differences in music had a significant impact on audiences’ perceptions and evaluations of 10 facets of animation films, including the story content, role identification and spiritual fit.

Keywords

animation music audience cognitive differences emotional expression in-depth interview music composers questionnaire sand animation viewing experience visual and sound effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beauchamp

(2005) Designing Sound for Animation. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Bordwell

Thompson

Smith

(2016) Film Art: An Introduction, 11th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Chen

(2010) The application of music montage in aesthetic analysis. Contemporary Cinema 9: 137–141.

Chen

(2016) Voiced render silent lead: Exploring on the impact of movie music on audiences’ psychology. Contemporary Cinema 8: 165–167.

Collingwood

(1972[1938]) The Principles of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coyle

(2010) Drawn to Sound: Animation Film Music and Sonicity. Sheffield: Equinox.

Dickie

(1997) Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analytic Approach (Vol. 109). New York: Oxford University Press.

Frith

(1984) Mood music. Screen 3: 78–88.

Giannetti

(2004) Understanding Movies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

10.

Goldman

(2004) Evaluating art. In: Kivy

(ed.) The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 93–108.

11.

Kalinak

(1992) Settling the Score: Music and the Classical Hollywood Film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

12.

Kivy

(1981) The Corded Schell-Reflections on Musical Expression. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

Langer

(1967) Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Larsen

(2009) Movie Music, trans. Nie XL and Wang WB. Jinan: Shandong Pictorial Publishing House.

15.

Laybourne

(1998) The Animation Book: A Complete Guide to Animated Filmmaking: From Flip-Books to Sound Cartoons to 3-D Animation. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

16.

Lin

(1993) Screen Skills and Means. Beijing: China Film Publishing.

17.

Lin

, et al. (2017) A pilot study of communication matrix for evaluating artworks. In: International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 356–368.

18.

Monaco

(2009) How to Read a Film: Movies, Media, and Beyond. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

19.

Purvy

(2008) Stop Motion: Passion, Process and Performance. Oxford: Elsevier.

20.

Schopenhauer

(1969) The World as Will and Representation, trans. Payne EFJ. New York, NY: Dover Publications.

21.

Selby

(2013) Animation. London: Laurence King.

22.

Shan

, et al. (2009) Emotion-based music recommendation by affinity discovery from film music. Expert systems with applications 36(4): 7666–7674.

23.

Taberham

(2018) A general aesthetics of American animation sound design. Animation 13(2): 131–147.

24.

Tolstoy

(1960) What Is Art? Indianapolis: Boobs-Merrill.

25.

Trivedi

(2004) Artist–audience communication: Tolstoy reclaimed. Journal of Aesthetic Education 2: 38–52.

26.

Wang

(2015) The movie music model from the perspective of sound and picture relationship. Contemporary Cinema 3: 36–138.

27.

Wells

(1998) Understanding Animation. London: Routledge.

28.

, et al. (2018) Empirical study of communication of audience cognition of environmental awareness. Sustainability 6: 1803–1816.

29.

(1986) Film Art Dictionary. Beijing: China Film Press.

30.

(2013) The phenomenon of misconduct and the correction policy: Aesthetic criticism for the symptoms of domestic film and television music creation. Contemporary Cinema 4: 161–165.