Make-Believing Animated Films Featuring Digital Humans: A Qualitative Inquiry Using Online Sources

Abstract

A qualitative inquiry of reviews of films featuring digital humanlike characters was performed by sampling user comments from three online reviewer aggregator sites: the Internet Movie Database, Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. The films chosen for analysis were: Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (dir. Hironobu Sakaguchi and Motonori Sakakibara, 2001), The Polar Express (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 2004), and Beowulf (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 2007), all produced using CGI animation, together with A Scanner Darkly (dir. Richard Linklater, 2006) whose visuals are depicted by rotoscoping using Bob Sabiston’s Rotoshop software. The authors’ analysis identified individual differences in the viewing experience, particularly in relation to the uncertain ontology of the humanlike characters created using CGI (CGI-Humans). They found examples of reviews indicating an inability to distinguish between real and CGI-Human actors, observations of characters transiently exhibiting realism before returning to their artifice, and of characters being viewed as eerie (analogous to the uncanny valley), thus illustrating a complex and dynamic response to this phenomenon. In some situations, character uncanniness was related to the presence of an atypical feature such as movement of the eyes. Whilst specifically for Beowulf, perceptions became more problematic when there was familiarity with the actor playing the CGI-Human character, with some reviewers describing difficulties in categorizing the character as either real or animated. CGI-Human performances were also characterized by a lack of, or inappropriate, social interaction. Online reviewers did not perceive characters depicted using Rotoshop (Rotoshop-Humans) as eerie; rotoscoping was found to preserve, and possibly enhance, the natural social interactions between actors recorded from the live-action film which was used as the source material for the animation. The authors’ inquiry also identified user motivations for viewing these films and the importance placed by reviewers on the form of display when viewing the CGI films. They situate their interpretation of these findings in relation to Walton’s make-believe theory (Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, 1990).

Keywords

animation CGI make-believe theory qualitative analysis Rotoshop synthespian uncanny valley viewers’ experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

A Scanner Darkly (2006a) (dir. Linklater

Richard

A Scanner Darkly (2006b) (DVD) (dir. Linklater

Richard

‘AaronN’ (2007) Beowulf. Available at: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/user/id/185584554/# (accessed 7 April 2016).

Aldred

(2011) From synthespian to avatar: Re-framing the digital human in Final Fantasy and The Polar Express. Available at: http://www.tft.ucla.edu/mediascape/Winter2011_Avatar.pdf (accessed 5 May 2016).

Atton

(2012) Listening to ‘difficult albums’: Specialist music fans and the popular avant-garde. Popular Music 31: 347–361.

‘awjonesjr’ (2001) You can’t replace acting with CGI, but you can try. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0173840/reviews-67 (accessed 1 April 2016).

Banks

(2015) Object, me, symbiote, Other: A social typology of player–avatar relationships. First Monday 20(2). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5433/4208 (accessed 12 May 2016).

Bateman

(2010) Game design as make-believe. Available at: http://blog.ihobo.com/2010/05/game-design-as-makebelieve.html (accessed 21 November 2016).

Bateman

(2011) Imaginary Games. Winchester: Zero Books.

10.

Beowulf (2007) (DVD) (dir. Zemeckis

Robert

11.

Bestor

(2016) The technologically determined decade: Robert Zemeckis, Andy Serkis and the promotion of performance capture. animation: an interdisciplinary journal 11(2): 169–188.

12.

Carroll

(1987) The nature of horror. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 46(1): 51–59.

13.

Carruthers

(2002) Human creativity: Its cognitive basis, its evolution, and its connections with childhood pretence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 225–249.

14.

‘cdemw’ (2007) Surprisingly good – a 3D treat. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0442933/reviews?start=0 (accessed 26 April 2016).

15.

Chakravarty

Liu

Mazumdar

(2010) The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’ reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 24: 185–197.

16.

‘cinderellakt’ (2008) A travesty. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0442933/reviews-440?mode=desktop (accessed 26 April 2016).

17.

Coleridge

(1907[1817]) Biographia Litereria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Cresswell

(2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, 3rd edn. London: Sage.

19.

‘crowrobot’ (2005) Visually stunning and exciting animated epic. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0173840/reviews-743 (accessed 30 March 2016).

20.

De Borst

De Gelder

(2015) Is it the real deal? Perceptions of virtual characters versus humans: An affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers of Psychology 6: 576.

21.

De Jong

IKE

Burgers

(2013) Do consumer critics write differently from professional critics? A genre analysis of online film reviews. Discourse, Context and Media 2: 75–83.

22.

Dick

(1977) A Scanner Darkly. London: Gollancz.

23.

‘Dribbleglass’ (2007) Pleasantly surprised. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405296/reviews-210 (accessed 30 March 2016).

24.

Ebert

(2001) Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within. Available at: http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/final-fantasy-the-spirits-within-2001 (accessed 28 November 2016).

25.

Elliot

Devine

(1994) On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(3): 382–394.

26.

‘Eternality’ (2011) Beowulf can be described as a colossal disappointment. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0442933/reviews-515 (accessed 17 March 2016).

27.

Festinger

(1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

28.

Follows

(2014) Do film critics and film audiences agree? Available at: https://stephenfollows.com/do-film-critics-and-audiences-agree/ (accessed 6 May 2016).

29.

‘FranzH’ (2015) Beowulf. Available at: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/user/id/971664638/ratings (accessed 30 March 2016).

30.

Freud

(2003[1919]) The Uncanny, trans. McLintock

. London: Penguin Classics.

31.

Gerrig

Egidi

(2010) The Bushwacked Piano and the bushwacked reader: The willing construction of disbelief. Style 44(1/2), Spring/Summer: 189–206.

32.

Gerrig

Rapp

(2004) Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today 25(2), Summer: 265–281.

33.

Gomes

. (2013) Metrics for character believability in interactive narrative. In: Koenitz

(eds) ICIDS 2013, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Interactive Storytelling, Vol. 8230. Berlin: Springer, 223–228.

34.

Hetherington

(2015) The believability of hyper realistic characters in animated movies. In: MIDI’15 Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation. Warsaw: ACM Digital Library. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2814478 (accessed 9 May 2016).

35.

Honess Roe

(2011) Uncanny indexes: Rotoshopped interviews as documentary. animation: an interdisciplinary journal 7(1): 25–37.

36.

Hooks

(2003) Acting for Animators. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

37.

IMDb (2016) Press Room. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/pressroom/about/ (accessed 6 May 2016).

38.

‘jaredmobarak’ (2007) Sins of the father … Beowulf. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0442933/reviews-143 (accessed 18 March 2016).

39.

Jentsch

(1997[1906]) On the psychology of the uncanny, trans. R Sellars. Angelaki 2(1): 7–16.

40.

‘jluis1984’ (2007) A great retelling of a legend. Available at: http://showtime.imdb.com/user/ur4939636/comments-expanded?order=date&start=0 (accessed 30 March 2016).

41.

‘joltjohn’ (2002) An out of this world visual and sound experience. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur2017521/comments-expanded?start=10&order=alpha (accessed 6 May 2016).

42.

Kätsyri

Mäkäräinen

Takala

(2015) A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: Support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology 6(390): 1–16.

43.

Kätsyri

Mäkäräinen

Takala

(2017) Testing the ‘uncanny valley’ hypothesis in semirealistic computer-animated film characters: An empirical evaluation of natural film stimuli. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 97: 149–161.

44.

Landis

Koch

(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159–174.

45.

‘legendarydrunkenmaster’ (2009) One of the best PKD adaptations. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur16267787/ (accessed 30 March 2016).

46.

MacDorman

Entezari

(2015) Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interaction Studies 16(2): 141–172.

47.

MacDorman

. (2009) Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior 25: 695–710.

48.

Mangan

(2015) The uncanny valley as fringe experience. Interaction Studies 16(2): 193–199.

49.

Mar

. (2007) Detecting agency from the biological motion of veridical vs animated agents. SCAN 2: 199–205.

50.

‘Mary P’ (2014) Beowulf reviews. Available at: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/beowulf/reviews/?page=4&type=user (accessed 1 April 2016).

51.

Materna

(2006) ‘A Scanner Darkly’: An animated illusion. Animation World Network. Available at: http://www.awn.com/animationworld/scanner-darkly-animated-illusion (accessed 9 May 2016).

52.

McCarthy

(2007) Crix mix needs fix: Reviewers get feisty as consumer media trims coverage and online voices grow louder. Variety 408(9): 1.

53.

McClean

(2007) Digital Storytelling: The Narrative Power of Visual Effects in Film. London: MIT Press.

54.

Mori

(1970) Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley). Energy 7: 33–356.

55.

‘Neil Welch’ (2009) Good but weird. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0442933/reviews?filter=love;filter=love;start=70 (accessed 30 March 2016).

56.

Neill

(1991) Fear, fiction and make-believe. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49(1): 47–56.

57.

Plantec

(2007) Crossing the great uncanny valley. Available at: http://www.awn.com/vfxworld/crossing-great-uncanny-valley (accessed April 22 2016).

58.

Prentice

Gerrig

(1998) Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. In: Chaiken

Trope

(eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford, 529–546.

59.

Prince

(1996) True lies: Perceptual realism, digital images, and film theory. Film Quarterly 49(3): 27–37.

60.

Quantcast.com (2016) Rottentomatoes.com traffic and demographic statistics by Quantcast. Available at: https://www.quantcast.com/rottentomatoes.com (accessed 6 May 2016).

61.

Radford

(1975) How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplemental 49: 67–80.

62.

‘Reviewer_A’ (2011) A Scanner Darkly. Available at: http://www.metacritic.com/user/AFountain (accessed 5 April 2016).

63.

‘Reviewer_B’ (2001) Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within. Available at: http://www.metacritic.com/movie/final-fantasy-the-spirits-within/user-reviews (accessed 1 April 2016).

64.

‘Reviewer_C’ (2001) Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within. Available at: http://www.metacritic.com/movie/final-fantasy-the-spirits-within/user-reviews (accessed 1 April 2016).

65.

‘Reviewer_D’ (2007) Beowulf. Available at: http://www.metacritic.com/movie/beowulf/user-reviews (accessed 1 April 2016).

66.

‘Robert D’ (2009) Beowulf. Available at: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/user/id/901244398/ (accessed 18 March 2016).

67.

Royle

(2003) The Uncanny. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

68.

Ruddell

(2011) ‘Don’t box me in’: Blurred lines in Waking Life and A Scanner Darkly. animation: an interdisciplinary journal 7(1): 7–23.

69.

Ryan

(2001) Fantasy Girl’s a geek. Available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20120324052710/http://archives.starbulletin.com/2001/07/10/features/story1.html (accessed 12 April 2016).

70.

Simmons

. (2011) Believable robot characters. AI Magazine, Winter: 39–52.

71.

Sobchack

(2006) Final fantasies: Computer graphic animation and the [dis]illusion of life. In: Buchan

(ed.) Animated Worlds. Eastleigh: John Libbey, 171–182.

72.

Taylor

Crocker

(1981) Schematic bases of social information processing. In: Higgins

. (eds) Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 89–134.

73.

‘The_Amazing_Spy_Rises’ (2007) A legendary story suffers a legendary butchering. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0442933/reviews-82 (accessed 7 April 2016).

74.

‘theshadow908’ (2006) Terrible. The book is much better. Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338348/reviews?start=420 (accessed 1 April 2016).

75.

Thomas

Johnston

(1981) The Illusion of Life. New York: Disney Editions.

76.

Tinwell

(2014) The Uncanny Valley in Games and Animation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

77.

Trafficestimate.com (2016) metacritic.com Website Traffic and Information | TrafficEstimate.com. Available at: http://www.trafficestimate.com/metacritic.com (accessed 6 May 2016).

78.

Turner

. (2015) The limits of pretending. Digital Creativity 26(3/4): 304–317.

79.

Walton

(1990) Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

80.

Ward

(2004) Rotoshop in context: Computer rotoscoping and animation aesthetics. Animation Journal 12: 32–52.

81.

Ward

(2011) Independent animation, Rotoshop and communities of practice: As seen through A Scanner Darkly. animation: an interdisciplinary journal 7(1): 59–72.

82.

Wells

(1998) Understanding Animation. London: Routledge.