A “soul” emerges when AI,AR,and Anime converge: A case study on users of the new anime-stylized hologram social robot “Hupo”

Abstract

By converging 3A—artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), and anime culture, a new type of non-naturalistic and stylized anthropomorphism has been exercised on the latest hologram social robot—“Hupo.” By combining scopes of human–machine communication and cultural studies, this study investigated how this 3A convergence constructed the user experience of Hupo. Through in-depth interviews with 25 users, we revealed their expected experience related to the dual identity of anime otaku and technology geeks alongside social segregation and loneliness. We found their actual experience highlighted how anime elements offset their dissatisfactions caused by AI weakness and the uncanny valley. Three specific anime-enabled strategies were illustrated, namely anime characterization, gamification, and idolization. Our analysis suggested that pop culture offers not technical solutions but temporary compensation for the current AI limitations. Nevertheless, such fusions between anime otakuism and instinct-served technologies also raise concerns about a further animalized human society.

Keywords

Anime fandom anthropomorphism artificial intelligence augmented reality human–machine communication hologram social robot technological animism uncanny valley virtual idol

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2008) Media convergence: creating content, questioning relationships. Computers and Composition 25(1): 1–8.

Appel

Marker

Mara

(2019) Otakuism and the appeal of sex robots. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 569.

Azuma

(2009) Otaku: Japan’s Database Animals. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Baudrillard

(1994) Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Bendel

(2019) Hologram girl. In: Zhou

Fischer

(eds) AI Love You. Cham: Springer, pp. 149–165.

Blohm

Leimeister

(2013) Gamification. Business & Information Systems Engineering 5(4): 275–278.

Bolton

(2016) Holographic assistant brings us one step closer to AI butlers. CNet, 20 January. Available at: https://www.cnet.com/news/japanese-holographic-assistant-brings-us-one-step-closer-to-a-i-butler/ (accessed 20 February 2022).

Boxall

(2019) A holographic virtual girlfriend lives inside Japan’s answer to the Amazon Echo. Digital Trends, 4 April. Available at: https://www.digitaltrends.com/home/gatebox-azuma-hikari-virtual-assistant-news/ (accessed 20 February 2022).

Chambers

SNI

(2012) Anime: from cult following to pop culture phenomenon. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 3(2): 94–101.

10.

Chen

(2017) Chinese Fans of Japanese and Korean Pop Culture: Nationalistic Narratives and International Fandom. New York: Routledge.

11.

Coeckelbergh

(2020) AI Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Colla

(2012) “Animism, magic and the omnipotence of thought”: ritualistic artefacts and mourning mediation in imperial China. In: Agostinho

Antz

Ferreira

(eds) Panic and Mourning: The Cultural Work of Trauma. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 181–192.

13.

Dayan

Katz

(1992) Media Events. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

14.

Duffy

(2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3–4): 177–190.

15.

Eco

(1994) Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

16.

Ellsworth

(2018) I’m not your Waifu: Sexual harassment and assault in cosplay, anime & comic conventions. MA Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.

17.

Eng

(2002) Otak-who? Technoculture, youth, consumption, and resistance: American representations of a Japanese youth subculture. In: Research Seminar Methods in STS. Available at: http://www.cjas.org/~leng/otaku.pdf (accessed 20 February 2022).

18.

Epley

Waytz

Cacioppo

(2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114(4): 864–886.

19.

Feher

Katona

(2021) Fifteen shadows of socio-cultural AI: a systematic review and future perspectives. Futures 132: 102817.

20.

Fontana

Frey

(2005) The interview. In: Denzin

Lincoin

(eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE, pp. 695–727.

21.

Fung

Pun

Mori

(2019) Reading border-crossing Japanese comics/anime in China: cultural consumption, fandom, and imagination. Global Media and China 4(1): 125–137.

22.

Galbraith

(2015) Otaku sexuality in Japan. In: McLelland

Mackie

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Sexuality Studies in East Asia. London: Routledge, pp. 205–217.

23.

Gatebox (2022) Comes to see you from another dimension. Available at: https://www.gatebox.ai/en/hikari (accessed 20 February 2022).

24.

GoWild (2022) HE Hupo. Available at: https://www.gowild.cn/home/product/he.html (accessed 20 May 2022).

25.

Guzman

Lewis

(2020) Artificial intelligence and communication: a human-machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society 22(1): 70–86.

26.

Haraway

(2006) Cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist feminism at the end of the twentieth century. Mouvements 4546(3): 15–21.

27.

Hayles

(2000) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Hine

(2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.

29.

Horton

Wohl

(1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19(3): 215–229.

30.

Jenkins

(2004) The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies 7(1): 33–43.

31.

Jiang

Kontauts

(2019) How social media affect youth civic participation in China. Regional Formation and Development Studies 27(1): 36–44.

32.

Jung

Lee

(2004) Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. Proceedings of PRESENCE 80–87. Available at: http://matthewlombard.com/ISPR/Proceedings/2004/Jung%20and%20Lee.pdf

33.

Kewenig

(2019) Intentionality but not consciousness: reconsidering robot love. In: Zhou

Fischer

(eds) AI Love You. Cham: Springer, pp. 21–39.

34.

Kleeman

(2017) The race to build the world’s first sex robot. The Guardian, 27 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/27/race-to-build-world-first-sex-robot (accessed 20 February 2022).

35.

Lamerichs

(2013) The cultural dynamic of doujinshi and cosplay: local anime fandom in Japan, USA and Europe. Participations 10(1): 154–176.

36.

Lamerichs

(2019) Character of the future: machine learning, data, and personality. IMAGE: Journal of Interdisciplinary Image Science 15(1): 98–117.

37.

Light

Burgess

Duguay

(2018) The walkthrough method: an approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society 20(3): 881–900.

38.

Lin

(2018) 发布「有生命的智能音箱」HE 琥珀, 狗尾草开启 AI 消费产品的下半场 [Releasing “a zoetic smart speaker” HE Hupo, GoWild starts the second half stage of AI consumer-grade products]. Available at: https://www.shenzhenware.com/articles/12621 (accessed 20 February 2022).

39.

Lindlof

Taylor

(2017) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

40.

Liu

Feldman

(2013) Gender in marriage and life satisfaction under gender imbalance in China: the role of intergenerational support and SES. Social Indicators Research 114(3): 915–933.

41.

Liu

(2021) Social Robots as the bride?: Understanding the construction of gender in a Japanese social robot product. Human-Machine Communication 2: 105–120.

42.

McCloud

(1993) Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Northampton, MA: William Marrow.

43.

McQuail

Windahl

(2015) Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communications. New York: Routledge.

44.

Matook

Cummings

Bala

(2015) Are you feeling lonely? The impact of relationship characteristics and online social network features on loneliness. Journal of Management Information Systems 31(4): 278–310.

45.

Mori

MacDorman

Kageki

(2012) The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19(2): 98–100.

46.

Napier

(2005) Anime from Akira to Howl's Moving Castle: Experiencing Contemporary Japanese Animation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

47.

Nass

Steuer

Tauber

(1994) Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, 24–28 April, pp. 72–78. New York: ACM.

48.

Nozawa

(2013) Characterization. Semiotic Review: Open Issue 3. Available at: https://www.semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/16/15 (accessed 20 May 2022).

49.

Pellitteri

(2018) Kawaii aesthetics from Japan to Europe: theory of the Japanese “cute” and transcultural adoption of its styles in Italian and French comics production and commodified culture goods. Arts 7(3): 24.

50.

Rauschnabel

(2021) Augmented reality is eating the real-world! The substitution of physical products by holograms. International Journal of Information Management 57: 102279.

51.

Reeves

Nass

(1996) The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Richardson

(2016) Technological animism: the uncanny personhood of humanoid machines. Social Analysis 60(1): 110–128.

53.

Rihl

Wegener

(2019) YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: using feedback channels in mediatized relationships. Convergence 25(3): 554–566.

54.

Robertson

(2010) Gendering humanoid robots: robo-sexism in Japan. Body & Society 16(2): 1–36.

55.

Searle

(1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3): 417–424.

56.

Song

Fox

(2016) Playing for love in a romantic video game: avatar identification, parasocial relationships, and Chinese women’s romantic beliefs. Mass Communication and Society 19(2): 197–215.

57.

Swale

(2015) Anime Aesthetics: Japanese Animation and the “Post-cinematic” Imagination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

58.

Taggart

Turkle

Kidd

(2005) An interactive robot in a nursing home: preliminary remarks. In: Proceedings of the toward social mechanisms of Android science: A CogSci 2005 Workshop, Italy, Stresa, 25–26 July 2005, pp. 56–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

59.

Temple

Young

(2004) Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research 4(2): 161–178.

60.

Tracy

(2019) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

61.

Turing

(1950) Mind. Mind 59(236): 433–460.

62.

Turkle

(2017) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. London: Hachette.

63.

White

Galbraith

(2019) Japan’s emerging emotional tech. Anthropology News 60(1): e41–e47.

64.

Wilde

(2019) Recontextualizing characters: media convergence and pre-/meta-narrative character circulation. IMAGE: Journal of Interdisciplinary Image Science 15(1): 3–21.

65.

Wilf

(2019) Separating noise from signal: the ethnomethodological uncanny as aesthetic pleasure in human-machine interaction in the United States. American Ethnologist 46(2): 202–213.

66.

Yang

Al-Sada

Chiu

, et al. (2020) HATSUKI: an anime character like robot figure platform with anime-style expressions and imitation learning based action generation. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, Naples, 31 August–4 September, pp. 384–391. New York: IEEE.

67.

Yin

Fung

(2017) Youth online cultural participation and Bilibili: an alternative form of democracy in China? In: Luppicini

Baarda

(eds) Digital Media Integration for Participatory Democracy. Philadelphia, PA: IGI Global, pp. 130–154.