Abstract
Revisioning the significance of Stan VanDerBeek is beset with a number of historiographical problems that tell us a great deal about history-making in technological times. Why, and more importantly, how, does a key experimental filmmaker breaking radical ground in animation and a technoart innovator of the American avant-garde of the 1960s and 70s fall into complete obscurity? The author argues that a very similar process is taking place around the reductive term ‘digital media’, the shift in technocultural production and consumption that rendered all filmic consciousness as animation.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
