The neo-classical model of the male body held a special place in late 18th-century political culture. Its impermeability, resulting from neoclassicism’s focus on line and contour, was especially invested with political meanings. It symbolized political and moral regeneration and helped create a ‘stoic’ male political subjectivity that validated the seizure of power by revolutionary citizens. This article discusses the meanings of visual representations of mutilated, violently opened male bodies against the backdrop of the importance of the impermeable, neo-classical male body. The author argues for understanding these bodies as testifying to the indeterminacy that came with modern democratic political life. Following French political philosopher Claude Lefort, he describes democratic society as a society that cannot be represented through the organic totality of the body. Society and politics under democracy are of an open-ended nature: opened bodies testify to this and unsettle the appearance of political stability and ‘closure’ that representations of the ideal body attempt to create.
Allart, J. (1783) De Vrijheid. Amsterdam: Johannes Allart.
2.
Baecque, A. de (1997) The Body Politic: Corporeal Metaphor in Revolutionary France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
Baker, K.M. (1990) Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Barrows, S. (1981) Distorting Mirrors: Visions of the Crowd in Late Nineteenth-Century France. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
5.
Bergvelt, E. (1998) Pantheon der Gouden Eeuw: Van Nationale Konstgallerij tot Rijksmuseum van Schilderijen (1798–1896). Zwolle: Waanders.
6.
Brooks, P. (1993) Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
7.
Bryson, N., M.A. Holly and K. Moxey (1994) Visual Culture: Images and Interpretations. Hanover and London: Wesleyan University Press.
8.
Burston, P. (1995) ‘Just a Gigolo? Narcissism, Nellyism and the “New Man” Theme’, in P. Burston and C. Richardson (eds) A Queer Romance: Lesbians,Gay Men and Popular Culture, pp. 111–122. London and New York: Routledge.
9.
Chapman, R. (1988) ‘The Great Pretender: Variations on the New Man Theme’, in R. Chapman and J. Rutherford (eds) Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity, pp. 225–248. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
10.
Connell, R.W. (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press.
11.
Connell, R.W. (1995) Masculinities. Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press.
12.
Craske, M. (1997) Art in Europe 1700–1800. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Crow, T. (1995) Emulation: Making Artists for Revolutionary France. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
14.
Duncan, C. (1993) ‘Fallen Fathers: Images of Authority in Pre-RevolutionaryFrench Art’, in The Aesthetics of Power: Essays in Critical Art History, pp. 27–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Edwards, T. (1997) Men in the Mirror: Men’s Fashion, Masculinity and Consumer Society. London: Cassell.
16.
Ewen, S. (1988) All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Gatens, M. (1996) ‘Corporeal Representation in/and the Body Politic’, in Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality, pp. 21–28. London and New York: Routledge.
18.
Grijzenhout, F. (1989) Feesten voor het Vaderland: Patriotse en Bataafse Feesten 1780–1806. Zwolle: Waanders.
19.
Grijzenhout, F. (1992) ‘A Myth of Decline’, in M.C. Jacob and W.W. Mijnhardt (eds) The Dutch Republic in the Eighteenth Century: Decline, Enlightenment, and Revolution, pp. 324–337. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
20.
Honegger, C. (1981) Die Ordnung der Geschlechter: Die Wissenschaften von Menschen und das Weib 1750–1850. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
21.
Honour, H. (1968) Neo-classicism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
22.
Hunt, L. (1984) Politics, Culture and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: California University Press.
23.
Klein, S.R.E. (1995) Patriots Republikanisme: Politieke Cultuur in Nederland (1766–1787). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
24.
Landes, J. (1988) Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
25.
Landes, J. (1992) ‘Representing the Body Politics: The Paradox of Gender in the Graphic Politics of the French Revolution’, in S.E. Melzer and L.W. Rabine (eds) Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution, pp. 15–37. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Laqueur, T. (1990) Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
27.
Lefort, C. (1986) ‘The Image of the Body and Totalitarianism’, in The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy Totalitarianism, pp. 292–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Lefort, C. (1988) ‘The Question of Democracy’, in Democracy and Political Theory, pp. 9–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Meijer, M. (1996) In Tekst Gevat: Inleiding tot een Kritiek van Representatie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
30.
Melzer, S.E. and L.W. Rabine (eds) (1992) Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Mercer, K. (1993) ‘Looking for Trouble’, in H. Abelove, M.A. Barale and D.M. Halperin (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, pp. 350–359. New York and London: Routledge.
32.
Michel, R. (1989) ‘Du martyr à l’éphèbe’, in M. P. Foissy-Aufrère (ed.) La Mort de Bara: De l’événement au mythe, autour du tableau de Jacques-Louis David, pp. 41–77. Avignon: Muséum Calvet.
33.
Mirzoeff, N. (1995) Bodyscape: Art, Modernity and the Ideal Figure. London and New York: Routledge.
34.
Mort, F. (1988) ‘Boys Own? Masculinity, Style and Popular Culture’, in R. Chapman and J. Rutherford (eds) Male Order: Unwrapping Masculinity, pp. 193–224. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
35.
Mort, F. (1996) Cultures of Consumption: Masculinities and Social Space in Late Twentieth-Century Britain. London and New York: Routledge.
36.
Mosse, G.L. (1996) The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. Oxford and New York: New York University Press.
37.
Nixon, S. (1996) Hard Looks: Masculinities, Spectatorship and Contemporary Consumption. London: UCL Press.
38.
Outram, D. (1989) The Body and the French Revolution: Sex, Class and Political Culture. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
39.
Pateman, C. (1988) The Sexual Contract. Oxford: Polity Press.
40.
Potts, A. (1994) Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
41.
Rosenblum, R. (1967) Transformations in Late Eighteenth Century Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Rosenblum, R. (1976) The International Style of 1800: A Study in Linear Abstraction. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
43.
Sas, N.C.F. van (1989) ‘Voor Vaderland en Oudheid: Het Klassieke Paradigma in de Laat Achttiende-Eeuwse Republiek’, in F. Grijzenhout and C. van Tuyll van Serooskerken (eds) Edele Eenvoud: Neo-Classicisme in Nederland 1765–1800, pp. 13–31. Zwolle: Waanders.
44.
Schiebinger, L. (1989) The Mind has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
45.
Schiebinger, L. (1993) Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
46.
Silverman, K. (1986) ‘Fragments of a Fashionable Discourse’, in T. Modleski (ed.) Studies in Entertainment: Critical Approaches to Mass Culture, pp. 139–152. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
47.
Sluga, G. (1998) ‘Identity, Gender and the History of European Nations and Nationalisms’, Nations and Nationalism4(1): 87–111.
48.
Solomon-Godeau, A. (1997) Male Trouble: A Crisis in Representation. London and New York: Thames & Hudson.
49.
Stallybrass, P. and A. White (1986) The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, NY and New York: Cornell University Press.
50.
Starobinski, J. (1973) 1789: Les Emblèmes de la raison. Milan and Paris: Flammarion.
