This article provides new cross-national measures of two dimensions of democratic citizenship with great import for the study of democratic quality, expressive participation, and intolerance of diversity. Using data from the 2000–2001 wave of the World Values Survey, the paper present new ways to measure participation and intolerance, as well as a ranking of countries from every geographical region of the world. As discussed, democratic theory provides a firm basis for including these measures when comparing the quality of democracy between nations. No causal claims regarding these concepts are made, but the case is made that political democracies in which citizens expressively participate and exhibit tolerance are of a higher quality than political democracies where citizens do not expressively participate and are intolerant.
AltmanDPérez-LiñánA (2002) Assessing the quality of democracy: freedom, competitiveness and participation in eighteen Latin American countries. Democratization9(2): 85–100.
2.
AlvarezMCheibubJALimongiF. (1996) Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development31: 3–36.
3.
BerelsonBR (1952) Democratic theory and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly16(3): 313–330.
4.
BollenKA (1980) Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review45(3): 370–390.
5.
BollenKA (1998) Cross-National Indicators of Political Democracy, 1950–1990. Chapel Hill, NC; Ann Arbor, MI: University of North Carolina; ICPSR.
6.
CampbellAConversePE (1972) The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
CampbellDE (2006) Education’s Impact on Civic and Social Engagement. Notre Dame, IN: OECD Centre for Education Research and Innovation.
8.
ConversePE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: ApterD (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press, 206–261.
9.
CoppedgeM (2006) 2000 Polyarchy Scale. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
10.
CoppedgeMReinickeW (1990) Measuring polyarchy. Studies in Comparative International Development25(1): 51–72.
11.
CrozierMHuntingtonSPWatanukiJ (1975) The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission (The Triangle Papers: 8). New York: New York University Press.
12.
CunninghamF (1987) Democratic Theory and Socialism. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press,.
13.
DahlRA (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory, Charles R. Walgreen Foundation Lectures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
DahlRA (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, Yale Studies in Political Science, vol. 4. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
DahlRA (1963) Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
DahlRA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
DahlRA (1989) Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
DeVellisRF (2003) Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Applied Social Research Methods Series), 2nd edn, vol. 26. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
GallieWB (1965) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society56: 167–198.
21.
GibsonJL (2006) Enigmas of intolerance: fifty years after Stouffer’s communism, conformity, and civil liberties. Perspectives on Politics4(1): 21–34.
22.
GibsonJLAndersonAJ (1985) The political implications of elite and mass tolerance. Political Behavior7(2): 118–146.
23.
HalebskyS (1976) Mass Society and Political Conflict: Toward a Reconstruction of Theory. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HeldD (1996) Models of Democracy, 2nd edn.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
HuntingtonSPHarvard University (1968) Center for International Affairs. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
HuntingtonSPNelsonJMand Harvard University (1976) Center for International Affairs: No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
InglehartRWelzelC (2003) Political culture and democracy: analyzing cross-level linkages. Comparative Politics36(1): 61–79.
28.
KeimDW (1975) Participation in contemporary democratic theories. In: PennockJRChapmanJW (eds) Participation in Politics, Nomos: 16. New York: Lieber-Atherton, 1–38.
29.
KornhauserW (1959) The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
30.
LoftusJ (2001) America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review66(5): 762–782.
31.
MarshallMGJaggersKGurrTR (2014) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013. George Mason University; University of Maryland. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
32.
MondakJJSandersMS (2003) Tolerance and intolerance, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science47(3): 492–502.
33.
MoscaGHannahDKahn. (1939) The Ruling Class (Elementi Di Scienza Politica), 1st edn. New York; London: McGraw-Hill Book company, Inc.
34.
NieNHJunnJStehlik-BarryK (1996) Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
PatemanC (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: University Press.
36.
PennockJRChapmanJW; American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy (1975) Participation in Politics, Nomos: 16. New York: Lieber-Atherton.
