This mixed methods study considered the relationship between the civic development of college students participating in the Serve Program at Ignatius University and the influence of these students’ parents. The Serve Program is a community service learning program that combines coursework in philosophy and theology with a year-long service project. Analyses of pre-post survey data revealed that students whose parents were highly supportive of their participation in the program demonstrated the greatest increases in public service motivation and expected political participation. Qualitative interviews with Serve participants revealed that highly supportive parents provided students with additional opportunities for reflection upon the readings, lectures and service projects they were encountering through the Serve Program.
AndolinaMJenkinsKZuckinC. (2003) Habits from home, lessons from school: influences on youth civic engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics36: 275–280.
2.
AstinAVogelgesangLIkedaE. (2000) Executive Summary: How Service Learning Affects Students. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
3.
BeckerH (1996) The epistemology of qualitative research. In ColbyA.JessorR.ShwederR. A. (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry, 53–71. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BlockJHaanNSmithB (1969) Socialization correlates of student activism. Journal of Social Issues25: 143–178.
5.
ClydesdaleT (2007) The First Year Out: Understanding American Teens After High School. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
ColbyABeaumontEEhrlichT. (2007) Educating for Democracy: Preparing Undergraduates for Responsible Political Engagement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Daloz ParksS (2000) Big Questions, Worthy Dreams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
8.
DamonW (2008) The Path to Purpose. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
DolteLCramerKDietzN. (2006) College Students Helping America. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.
10.
FitchT (1987) Characteristics and motivations of college students volunteering for community service. Journal of College Student Personnel28(5): 424–431.
11.
FlacksR (1971) Youth and Social Change. Chicago, IL: Markham.
12.
FlanaganCBowesJJonssonB. (1998) Ties that bind: correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues54(3): 457–475.
13.
GlaserB GStraussA L (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
HodgkinsonV (1995) Key factors influencing caring, involvement and community. In SchervishPHodgkinsonVGatesV and M (eds) Care and Commuity in Modern Society: Passing on the Tradition of Service to Future Generations, 21–50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
KendallJ (1990) Combining service and learning: an introduction. In KendallJ (ed.) Combining Service and Learning: A Resource Book for Community and Public Service. Raleigh, NC: National Society for Internships and Experiential Education, 1–33.
16.
KenistonK (1968) Young Radicals. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
17.
KleinerBChapmanC (1999) Youth Service-Learning and Community Service Among 6th Through 12-Grade Students in the United States: 1996 and 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
18.
LakoffG (1996) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
LiuARuizSDeAngeloL. (2009) Findings From the 2008 Administration of the College Senior Survey (CSS): National Aggregates. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education. Research Institute, UCLA.
20.
MaykutPMorehouseR (1994) Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
21.
McAdamD (1988) Freedom Summer. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
McKinneyK (2002) Engagement in community service among college students: is it affected by significant attachment relationships?Journal of Adolescence25(2): 139–154.
23.
MilesMHubermanA (1999) Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
NolinMChaneyBChapmanC. (1997) Student Participation in Community Service. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
PancerSPrattM (1999) Social and family determinants of community service involvement in Canadian youth. In YatesMYounissJ (eds) Community Service and Civic Engagement in Youth: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32–55.
27.
PattonM (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
28.
PerryJ (1996) Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1): 5–22.
29.
RokerDPlayerKColemanJ (1999) Challenging the Image: Young People as Volunteers and Campaigners. Leicester: National Youth Agency.
30.
RosenhanD (1970) The natural socialization of altruistic autonomy. In MacaulayJBerkowitzL (eds) Altruism and Helping Behavior, 251–268. New York: Academic Press.
31.
SchervishP (1995) Gentle as doves and wise as serpents: the philosophy of care and the sociology of transmission. In SchverishPHodgkinsonVGatesM (eds) Care and Community in Modern Society, 1–20. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
SchmidtJAShumowLKackarH (2007) Adolescents’ participation in service activities and its impact on academic, behavioral, and civic outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence36: 127–140.
33.
SeiderS (2007) Catalysing a commitment to community service in emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research22(6): 612–639.
34.
SeiderSRabinowiczSGillmorS (2011a) The impact of philosophy and theology service-learning experiences on the public service motivation of participating college students. Journal of Higher Education82(5): 597–628.
35.
SeiderSRabinowiczSGillmorS (2011b) Changing American college students’ conceptions of poverty through community service learning. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy11(1): 105–126.
36.
SeiderSGillmorSRabinowiczS (2012) The impact of community service learning upon the expected political voice of participating college students. Journal of Adolescent Research27(1): 44–77.
37.
StraussWHoweN (2000) Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage.
38.
TierneyTBranchA (1992) College Students as Mentors for at-risk Youth. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
39.
Torney-PurtaJRichardsonW (2005) Anticipated political engagement among adolescents in Australia, England, Norway, and the United States. In DemaineJ (ed.) Citizenship and Political Education Today, 41–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
Torney-PurtaJSchwilleJAmadeoJ (1999) Civic Education Across Countries: Twenty-Four National Case Studies From the IEA Civic Education Project. Amsterdam: IEA Secretariat.
41.
TwengeJ (2006) Generation Me. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
42.
WeissbourdR (2009) The Parents We Mean to Be. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
43.
YounissJMcLellanJYatesM (1997) What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist40: 620–631.
44.
YounissJMcLellanJYatesM (1999) Religion, community service, and identity in American youth. Journal of Adolescence22: 243–53.
