ChenKLuZXinYCet al.Alpha-2 agonists for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; 1: CD010269–CD010269.
2.
RuokonenEParviainenIJakobSMet al.Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med2009; 35: 282–290.
3.
TurunenHJakobSMRuokonenEet al.Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation. Crit Care2015; 19: 67–67.
4.
ThomaBNLiJMcDanielCMet al.Clinical and economic impact of substituting dexmedetomidine for propofol due to a US drug shortage: examination of coronary artery bypass graft patients at an urban medical centre. Pharmacoeconomics2014; 32: 149–157.
5.
All Wales Therapeutic and Toxicology Centre. AWMSG Secretariat assessment report: advice no. 2312: dexmedetomidine (Dexdor®) 100 micrograms/ml concentrate foe solution for infusion. Penarth, Wales, UK: All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, 2014.
6.
LachaineJBeaucheminC. Economic evaluation of dexmedetomidine relative to midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit. Can J Hosp Pharm2012; 65: 103–110.
7.
DastaJFKane-GillSLPencinaMet al.A cost-minimization analysis of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med2010; 38: 497–503.
AthanazioRMaldiniPRoaSet al.Cost-minimisation analysis of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in mechanical ventilated patients at ICU. Value Health2015; 18: A842–A843.
10.
PatanwalaAEErstadBL. Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on hospital costs and length of stay. J Intensive Care Med2016; 31: 466–470.
11.
RikerRRShehabiYPencinaMet al.The cost effectiveness of dexmedetomidine vs midazolam in adult ICU patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: an economic model. Crit Care Med2008; 36: A17–A17.