This study examines the third-person perception in the context of cosmeceutical product advertising. Experimental results found that female participants showed a relatively negative attitude toward cosmeceutical product advertising. However, most female participants believed that such advertising would influence others more than themselves when they were exposed to both product advertising and product information as appeared in a news story. Moreover, such third-person perception was moderated by various levels of body esteem as reported by female participants. Practical implications for cosmeceutical product advertisers and marketers are discussed.
Chao L. Beauty: searching for a quick fix, pills are sold out to make you look great, but doctors see no evidence they work. The Wall Street Journal, 11 October 2005, D6.
5.
DoyleL. Are you what you eat?Glob Cosmet Ind2005; 173: 58–60.
6.
KahnC. How the media influences women’s perceptions of health care. Market Health Serv2001; 21: 13–17.
7.
PerloffRMMass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In: BryantJOliverMB (eds). Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2009, pp. 252–269.
8.
Tsao A. The changing face of skin care. BusinessWeek Online, Business Source Premier, EBSCO host (2004, accessed 12 May 2014).
9.
GrammenouE. What’s next for cosmeceuticals and nutricosmetics?Glob Cosmet Ind2009; 177: 38–40.
10.
PenningA. The importance of efficacy in cosmeceutical beauty. Glob Cosmet Ind2011; 179: 42–45.
11.
Cosmeceuticals Surpasses $13 Billion in 2005. Glob Cosmet Ind 2006; 174: 8.
MengJPanPL. Investigating the effects of cosmeceutical product advertising in beauty-care decision making. Int J Pharmaceut Healthcare Market2012; 6: 250–266.
18.
US Demand for Cosmeceuticals to Reach $8.5 Billion. Glob Cosmet Ind 2011; 179: 30.
19.
CohenJMutzDPriceV. Perceived impact of defamation: an experiment on third-person effects. Publ Opin Quart1988; 52: 161–173.
20.
HaridakisPMRubinAM. Third-person effects in the aftermath of terrorism. Mass Commun Soc2005; 8: 39–59.
21.
ReidSA. A self-categorization explanation for the third-person effect. Human Commun Res2005; 31: 129–161.
22.
SalwenMBDupagneM. Third-person perception of television violence: the role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychol2001; 3: 211–236.
23.
ScharrerE. Third-person perception and television violence: the role of out-group stereotyping in perceptions of susceptibility of effects. Commun Res2002; 29: 681–704.
24.
LoVHWeiR. Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet. J Broadcast Electron Media2002; 46: 13–33.
25.
TewksburyD. The role of comparison group size in the third-person effect. Int J Publ Opin Res2002; 14: 247–263.
26.
LiuXLoVH. Media exposure, perceived personal impact, and third-person effect. Media Psychol2014; 17: 378–396.
27.
DeLormeDHuhJReidLN. Perceived effects of direct-to consumer prescription drug advertising on self and others: a third-person effect study of older consumers. J Advert2006; 35: 47–65.
28.
HuhJDeLormeDReidLN. The information utility of DTC prescription drug advertising. Journalism Mass Commun Quart2004; 81: 788–806.
29.
DavidPMorrisonMJohnsonM. Body image, race and fashion models: social distance and social identification in third-person effects. Commun Res2002; 29: 270–294.
30.
ChapinJ. Third-person perception and sexual risk taking among minority ‘at risk’ youth. Mass Commun Soc1999; 2: 163–173.
31.
Golan G, Banning S and Lundy L. Likelihood to vote, candidate choice and the third-person perceptions. In: AEJMC conference, Montreal, Canada, August 2005.
32.
PaekHJPanZSunY. The third-person perception as social judgment: an exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Commun Res2005; 32: 143–170.
33.
Tal-OrNTsfatiYGuntherACThe influence of presumed media influence: origins and implications of the third-person perception. In: NabiRLOliverMB (eds). The sage handbook of media processes and effects, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009, pp. 99–112.
34.
ChiaS. How peers mediate media influences on adolescents’ sexual attitudes and sexual behavior. J Commun2008; 56: 585–606.
35.
GuntherACStoreyJ. The influence of presumed influence. J Commun2003; 19: 574–596.
36.
HuhJDeLormeDReidLN. The third-person effects and its influence on behavioral outcomes in a product advertising context: the case of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Commun Res2004; 31: 568–599.
37.
Tsfati Y and Cohen J. The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting: evidence from the Israeli 2003 and 2006 elections. In: NCA conference, Chicago, United States, November 2007.
38.
GuntherACStoreyJ. The influence of presumed influence. J Commun2003; 19: 574–596.
39.
HoffnerCBuchananM. Parents’ response to television violence: the third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship. Media Psychol2002; 4: 231–252.
40.
Tsfati Y and Cohen J. The influence of presumed media influence on strategic voting: evidence from the Israeli 2003 and 2006 elections. In: NCA conference, Chicago, United States, November 2007.
41.
WuWKooSH. Perceived effects of sexually explicit Internet content: the third-person effect in Singapore. Journalism Mass Commun Quart2001; 78: 260–274.
42.
Guerrero-SoléFBesalúRLópez-GonzálezH. Save me, save them! Trash talk shows and the third-person effect. Commun: Eur J Commun Res2014; 39: 193–214.
43.
PanPLMengJZhouS. Examining third-person perceptions in the context of sexually oriented advertising. J Promot Manag2012; 18: 189–208.
44.
PaekHJPanZSunY. The third-person perception as social judgment: an exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Commun Res2005; 32: 143–170.
45.
DewberryDR. The third-person effect goes to congress. South Commun J2014; 79: 279–292.
46.
BrosiusHEngelD. The causes of third-person effects: unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence?Int J Publ Opin Res1996; 8: 142–162.
47.
GuntherACMundyP. Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quart1993; 70: 58–67.
48.
MendelsonBKWhiteDR. Development of self-body-esteem in overweight youngsters. Develop Psychol1985; 21: 90–96.
