Effects of demographic and socioeconomic variables on preventive health care decisions: an empirical investigation of cervical and breast cancer screening decisions
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2012
Effects of demographic and socioeconomic variables on preventive health care decisions: an empirical investigation of cervical and breast cancer screening decisions
Demographic and cognitive variables have often been found to be significant determinants of symptomatically driven health screenings. However, their role in preventive health care decisions is less clear. Using National Health Interview Survey data, we have examined the factors that are correlated to cervical and breast cancer screenings. The results of logistic regression analysis suggest that significant determinants of the decision to have a Papanicolaou smear include type of health insurance, formal education, income level, age, race, marital status and health knowledge. The significant variables for the mammogram decision are different in kind or degree from that of Papanicolaou smear. Our findings indicate that having additional type of health insurance, region of residency and self-reported health status are among the most significant determinants for breast cancer screening decisions. We offer theoretical explanations for the different results, as well as further research suggestions. Managerial and policy implications are discussed.
TuS-PJacksonSLYasuiY. Cancer preventive screening: a cross-border comparison of United States and Canadian Chinese women. Prev Med2005; 41(1): 36–46.
3.
ConsedineNSMagaiCNeugutAI. The contribution of emotional characteristics to breast cancer screening among women from six ethnic groups. Prev Med2004; 38(1): 64–77.
4.
SaywellRMJrChampionVLSkinnerCS. Cost effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening. Prev Med1999; 29(5): 374–382.
5.
EloITPrestonSH. Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979-1985. Soc Sci Med1996; 42(1): 47–57.
6.
KenkelDS. Should you eat breakfast? Estimates from health production functions. Health Econ1995; 4(1): 15–29.
7.
BarrettKLeggJ. Demographic and health factors associated with mammography utilization. Am J Health Promot2005; 19(6): 401–405.
8.
AdamsEKFlorenceCSThorpeKE. Preventive care: female cancer screening, 1996-2000. Am J Prev Med2003; 25(4): 301–307.
9.
GrossmanM. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ1972; 80(2): 223–255.
10.
FuchsV. The health economy, Cambridge: Harvard University, 1986.
11.
KenkelDS. The demand for preventive care. Appl Econ1994; 26(4): 313–325.
12.
PiconeGSloanFTaylorD. Effects of risk and time preference and expected longevity on demand for medical tests. J Risk Uncertainty2004; 28(1): 39–53.
13.
KatzKJHoferTP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. J Am Med Assoc1994; 272(7): 530–534.
14.
BenthamGHintonJHaynesR. Factors affecting non-response to cervical cytology screening in Norfolk, England. Soc Sci Med1995; 40(1): 131–135.
15.
FeldsteinM. The economics of health and health care: what have we learned? What have I learned?Am Econ Rev1995; 85(2): 28–37.
16.
BurackRCLiangJ. The early detection of cancer in the primary care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended procedures. Prev Med1987; 16(6): 739–751.
17.
EdwardsNIJonesDA. Uptake of breast cancer screening in older women. Age Aging2000; 29(2): 131–135.
18.
HaywardRAShapiroMFFreemanHE. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer: results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med1988; 148(5): 1177–1181.
19.
MandelblattJSTraxlerMLakinP. Targeting breast and cervical cancer screening to elderly poor black women: who will participate?Prev Med1993; 22(1): 20–33.
20.
CropperM. Health, investment in health, and occupational choice. J Polit Econ1977; 85(6): 1273–1294.
21.
LahiriKXingG. An econometric analysis of veterans’ health care utilization using two-part models. Empir Econ2004; 29(2): 431–449.
22.
NolanB. Economic incentives, health status and health services utilisation. J Health Econ1993; 12(2): 151–169.
23.
DardanoniVWagstaffA. Uncertainty and the demand for medical care. J Health Econ1990; 9(1): 23–38.
24.
GrossmanM. TerlekcyjN. The correlation between health and schooling. Household production and consumption, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1976; 147–224.
25.
KenkelDS. Health behavior, health knowledge, and schooling. J Polit Econ1991; 99(2): 287–305.
26.
FuchsV. FuchsVR. Time preference and health: an exploratory study. Economic aspects of health, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982; 93–120.
27.
BergerMCLeighJP. Schooling, self-selection, and health. J Hum Resour1989; 24(3): 433–455.
28.
HsiehCRLinSJ. Health information and demand for preventive care among the elderly in Taiwan. J Hum Resour1997; 32(2): 308–333.
29.
CoffeyRM. The effect of time price on demand for medical care services. J Hum Resour1983; 18(3): 407–424.
30.
CauleySD. The time price of medical care. Rev Econ Stat1987; 69(1): 59–66.
31.
MoormanCMatulichE. A model of consumers’ preventive health behaviors: the role of health motivation and health ability. J Consumer Res1993; 20(2): 208–228.
32.
WolinskyFD. Assessing the effects of predisposing, enabling, and illness-morbidity characteristics on health service utilization. J Health Soc Behav1978; 19(4): 384–396.
33.
GornickMEEggersPWRileyGF. Associations of race, education, and patterns of preventive service use with stage of cancer at time of diagnosis. Health Serv Res2004; 39(5): 1403–1427.
34.
CalleEEFlandersWDThunMJ. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Publ Health1993; 83(1): 53–60.
35.
DiazVA. Cultural factors in preventive care: Latinos. Prim Care2002; 29(3): 503–517.
36.
MatajicBVukovicDPekmezovicT. Determinants of preventive health behavior in relation to cervical cancer screening among the female population of Belgrade. Health Educ Res2011; 26(2): 201–211.
37.
HarperDMLongacreMRNollWW. Factors affecting the detection rate of human papilloma virus. Ann Fam Med2003; 1(4): 221–227.
