The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive

Abstract

Psychological science is at an inflection point: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated inequalities that stem from our historically closed and exclusive culture. Meanwhile, reform efforts to change the future of our science are too narrow in focus to fully succeed. In this article, we call on psychological scientists—focusing specifically on those who use quantitative methods in the United States as one context for such conversations—to begin reimagining our discipline as fundamentally open and inclusive. First, we discuss whom our discipline was designed to serve and how this history produced the inequitable reward and support systems we see today. Second, we highlight how current institutional responses to address worsening inequalities are inadequate, as well as how our disciplinary perspective may both help and hinder our ability to craft effective solutions. Third, we take a hard look in the mirror at the disconnect between what we ostensibly value as a field and what we actually practice. Fourth and finally, we lead readers through a roadmap for reimagining psychological science in whatever roles and spaces they occupy, from an informal discussion group in a department to a formal strategic planning retreat at a scientific society.

Keywords

open science inclusive science meta-science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002

Ahmed

(2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.

Albornoz

(2016, March 18). Open access as inclusion: An interview with Juan Pablo Alperin. Force11. https://www.force11.org/blog/open-access-inclusion-interview-juan-pablo-alperin

Albornoz

(2018). Reimagining open science through a feminist lens. https://medium.com/@denalbz/reimagining-open-science-through-a-feminist-lens-546f3d10fa65

Alter

Gonzalez

(2018). Responsible practices for data sharing. American Psychologist, 73, 146–156.

American Psychological Association. (2020). American Psychological Association strategic plan. https://www.apa.org/about/apa/strategic-plan

Anderson

C. A.

Allen

J. J.

Plante

Quigley-McBride

Lovett

Rokkum

J. N.

(2019). The MTurkification of social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 842–850.

Antecol

Bedard

Stearns

(2016, April). Equal but inequitable: Who benefits from gender-neutral tenure clock stopping policies? (Discussion Paper 9904). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. http://ftp.iza.org/dp9904.pdf

Arnett

J. J.

(2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. https://doi.org/1037/0003-066X.63.7.602

10.

Association for Psychological Science. (n.d.). Mission and history. Retrieved August 7, 2020 from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/about/mission-and-history

11.

Atkinson

Richter

(2020, November 10). Pandemic disproportionately affects women, minority labor force participation. Dallas Fed Economics. https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2020/1110

12.

Austin

A. E.

(2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132

13.

Bahlai

Bartlett

L. J.

Burgio

K. R.

Fournier

A. M. V.

Keiser

C. N.

Poison

Whitney

K. S.

(2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1511/2019.107.2.78

14.

Bailey

A. H.

Lafrance

Dovidio

J. F.

(2020). Implicit androcentrism: Men are human, women are gendered. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, Article 103980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103980

15.

Bavishi

Madera

J. M.

Hebl

M. R.

(2010). The effect of professor ethnicity and gender on student evaluations: Judged before met. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(4), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020763

16.

Bellamy

P. L.

Mosely

D. V.

Green

C. E.

Neville

Hargons

Lewis

J. A.

Burdine

Whittaker

V. A.

French

B. H.

Steverson

Adames

H. Y.

Busey

Adam

Mejia

Ross

Lewis

Lee

Emerson

Abiodun

. . . Samanez-Larkin

(2020, June). Academics for Black survival and wellness anti-racism training. Academics for Black Survival and Wellness. https://www.academics4blacklives.com/anti-racism-training

17.

Bellas

M. L.

Toutkoushian

R. K.

(1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. The Review of Higher Education, 22, 367–390.

18.

Berscheid

(1992). A glance back at a quarter century of social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 525–543.

19.

Betancourt

López

S. R.

(1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48(6), 629–637.

20.

Biernat

Kobrynowicz

(1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544

21.

Bowleg

(2021). “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house”: Ten critical lessons for Black and other health equity researchers of color. Health Education & Behavior, 48(3), 237–249.

22.

Boykin

C. M.

Brown

N. D.

Carter

J. T.

Dukes

Green

D. J.

Harrison

Hebl

McCleary-Gaddy

Membere

McJunkins

C. A.

Simmons

Walker

S. S.

Smith

A. N.

Williams

A. D.

(2020). Anti-racist actions and accountability: Not more empty promises. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39(7), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-06-2020-0158

23.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Payne

B. K.

Trawalter

(2013). Narrow imaginations: How imagining ideal employees can increase racial bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 661–670.

24.

Bulhan

H. A.

(2015). Stages of colonialism in Africa: From occupation of land to occupation of being. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 239–256.

25.

Butler

(2021, January 19). Beyond tenure clock management. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2021/01/19/tenure-clock-extensions-arent-enough-help-support-researchers-and-their-work

26.

Carter

E. R.

Onyeador

I. N.

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. (2020). Developing & delivering effective anti-bias training: Challenges & recommendations. Behavioral Science & Policy, 6(1), 57–70.

27.

Centre for Community Organizations. (2019). White supremacy culture in organizations. https://coco-net.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Coco-WhiteSupCulture-ENG4.pdf

28.

Chaiken

Ledgerwood

(2011). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In Van Lange

P. A. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 246–266). SAGE.

29.

Chartier

Kline

McCarthy

Nuijten

Dunleavy

D. J.

Ledgerwood

(2018). The cooperative revolution is making psychological science better. APS Observer, 31(10). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-cooperative-revolution-is-making-psychological-science-better

30.

Cheon

B. K.

Melani

Hong

(2020). How USA-centric is psychology? An archival study of implicit assumptions of generalizability of findings to human nature based on origins of study samples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620927269

31.

Cheryan

Markus

H. R.

(2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209

32.

Cho

Crenshaw

McCall

(2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608

33.

Clancy

K. B.

Davis

J. L.

(2019). Soylent is people, and WEIRD is white: Biological anthropology, whiteness, and the limits of the WEIRD. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48, 169–186.

34.

Cognition. (n.d.). Research data, in Guide for authors. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.elsevier.com/journals/cognition/0010-0277/guide-for-authors

35.

Cole

E. R.

(2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.

36.

Coleman

M. L.

(2020, April 23). Essential workers are being treated as expendable. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/farmworkers-are-being-treated-as-expendable/610288

37.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

38.

Danbold

Huo

Y. J.

(2017). Men’s defense of their prototypicality undermines the success of women in STEM initiatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 57–66.

39.

Danbold

Unzueta

M. M.

(2020). Drawing the diversity line: Numerical thresholds of diversity vary by group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(2), 283–306.

40.

da Silva Frost

Ledgerwood

(2020, March 4). Calibrate your confidence in research findings: A tutorial on improving research methods and practices. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6uxkb

41.

De Deyne

Navarro

D. J.

Perfors

Brysbaert

Storms

(2019). The small world of words: English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 987–1006.

42.

Devos

Banaji

M. R.

(2005). American = White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447

43.

DORA. (2012). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read

44.

Ducey

Feagin

J. R.

(2021). Revealing Britain’s systemic racism: The case of Meghan Markle and the royal family. Routledge.

45.

Duckworth

A. L.

Kim

Tsukayama

(2013). Life stress impairs self-control in early adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00608

46.

El-Alayli

Hansen-Brown

A. A.

Ceynar

(2018). Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles, 79, 136–150.

47.

England

(2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122317

48.

Evans

T. M.

Bira

Gastelum

J. B.

Weiss

L. T.

Vanderford

N. L.

(2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284.

49.

Everett

Gaither

(2020, October 22). Early Career Committee reports on 2020 initiatives and achievements. Society for Personality and Social Psychology. https://www.spsp.org/news-center/announcements/2020-earlycareer-initiatives-achievements

50.

Fairweather

J. S.

(2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772290

51.

Feagin

J. R.

Ducey

(2017). Elite White men ruling. Routledge.

52.

Flis

(2019). Psychologists psychologizing scientific psychology: An epistemological reading of the replication crisis. Theory & Psychology, 29, 158–181.

53.

Forrester

J. W.

(1968). Principles of systems. Productivity Press.

54.

Forscher

B. K.

(1963). Chaos in the brickyard. Science, 142(3590), 339.

55.

Fox

M. F.

(2015). Gender and clarity of evaluation among academic scientists in research universities. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(4), 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914564074

56.

Freeman

(2018). LGBTQ scientists are still left out. Nature, 559(7712), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05587-y

57.

Freeman

J. B.

(2020). Measuring and resolving LGBTQ disparities in STEM. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220943232

58.

Frith

(2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 1–2.

59.

Furstenberg

(2020, May 19). University leaders are failing. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/university-leaders-are-failing

60.

Gewin

(2020). The time tax put on scientists of colour. Nature, 583(7816), 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01920-6

61.

Gilmore

R. O.

Kennedy

J. L.

Adolph

K. E.

(2018). Practical solutions for sharing data and materials from psychological research. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917746500

62.

Goff

Kahn

(2013). How psychological science impedes intersectional thinking. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000313

63.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

64.

Gonzales

L. D.

(2018). Subverting and minding boundaries: The intellectual work of women. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 677–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278

65.

Gruber

Mendle

Lindquist

K. A.

Schmader

Clark

L. A.

Bliss-Moreau

Akinola

Atlas

Barch

D. M.

Barrett

L. F.

Borelli

J. L.

Brannon

T. N.

Bunge

S. A.

Campos

Cantlon

Carter

Carter-Sowell

A. R.

Chen

Craske

M. G.

. . . Williams

L. A.

(2021). The future of women in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 483–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620952789

66.

Grzanka

P. R.

Cole

E. R.

(2021). An argument for bad psychology: Disciplinary disruption, public engagement, and social transformation. American Psychologist, 76(8), 1334–1345. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000853

67.

Grzanka

P. R.

Miles

J. R.

(2016). The problem with the phrase “intersecting identities”: LGBT affirmative therapy, intersectionality, and neoliberalism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 371–389.

68.

Guarino

C. M.

Borden

V. M.

(2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694.

69.

Gupta

(2020, October 3). Why did hundreds of thousands of women drop out of the work force? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/03/us/jobs-women-dropping-out-workforce-wage-gap-gender.html

70.

Guthrie

R. V.

(2004). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology. Pearson Education.

71.

Hall

N. C.

Lee

S. Y.

Rahimi

(2019). Self-efficacy, procrastination, and burnout in post-secondary faculty: An international longitudinal analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(12), Article e022671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226716

72.

Hamedani

M. Y. G.

Markus

H. R.

(2019). Understanding culture clashes and catalyzing change: A culture cycle approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00700

73.

Hamilton

D. L.

Sherman

S. J.

Ruvolo

C. M.

(1990). Stereotype-based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 35–60.

74.

Harris

(2019, April 8). The death of an adjunct. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2019/04/adjunct-professors-higher-education-thea-hunter/586168

75.

Henninger

Hart

(2020, June 23). Open toolmakers’ birds of a feather session [Conference session]. Annual Meeting of the Society of Improving Psychological Science (virtual conference). https://osf.io/ank7g

76.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152x

77.

Hilgard

(2020). SIPS demographic report. Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. https://improvingpsych.org/2020/06/16/sips-demographics-report

78.

Hirshfield

L. E.

Joseph

T. D.

(2012). ‘We need a woman, we need a black woman’: Gender, race, and identity taxation in the academy. Gender and Education, 24(2), 213–227.

79.

Hogan

V. K.

de Araujo

E. M.

Caldwell

K. L.

Gonzalez-Nahm

S. N.

Black

K. Z.

(2018). “We black women have to kill a lion everyday”: An intersectional analysis of racism and social determinants of health in Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 199, 96–105.

80.

J. C.

(2019, August 26). NSF graduate fellowships disproportionately go to students at a few top schools. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.aaz2709

81.

International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer & Intersex Youth and Student Organisation. (2014). Intersectionality toolkit. https://www.iglyo.com/resources/intersectionality-toolkit-2014

82.

Jaremka

L. M.

Ackerman

J. M.

Gawronski

Rule

N. O.

Sweeny

Tropp

L. R.

Metz

M. A.

Molina

Ryan

W. S.

Vick

S. B.

(2020). Common academic experiences no one talks about: Repeated rejection, impostor syndrome, and burnout. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619898848

83.

Jimenez

M. F.

Laverty

T. M.

Bombaci

S. P.

Wilkins

Bennett

D. E.

Pejchar

(2019). Underrepresented faculty play a disproportionate role in advancing diversity and inclusion. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(7), 1030–1033.

84.

Joseph

T. D.

Hirshfield

L. E.

(2011). ‘Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 121–141.

85.

Jost

J. T.

Liviatan

van der Toorn

Ledgerwood

Mandisodza

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? In Bobocel

D. R.

Kay

A. C.

Zanna

M. P.

Olson

J. M.

(Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

86.

Judd

C. M.

Westfall

Kenny

D. A.

(2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347

87.

Kaiser

C. R.

Major

Jurcevic

Dover

T. L.

Brady

L. M.

Shapiro

J. R.

(2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030838

88.

Keith

(2018). History of psychology in cultural context. In Keith

(Ed.), Culture across the curriculum: A psychology teacher’s handbook (Culture and Psychology, pp. 95–112). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316996706.007

89.

Kendi

I. X.

(2017). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Random House.

90.

Kidwell

M. C.

Lazarević

L. B.

Baranski

Hardwicke

T. E.

Piechowski

Falkenberg

L. S.

Kennett

Slowik

Sonnleitner

Hess-Holden

Errington

T. M.

Fiedler

Nosek

B. A.

(2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLOS Biology, 14(5), Article e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

91.

Kim

J. Y.

Fitzsimons

G. M.

Kay

A. C.

(2018). Lean in messages increase attributions of women’s responsibility for gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 974–1001. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000129

92.

Klein

J. T.

Falk-Krzesinski

H. J.

(2017). Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies. Research Policy, 46, 1055–1061.

93.

Klein

R. A.

Vianello

Hasselman

Adams

B. G.

Adams

R. B.

Jr. Alper

Batra

(2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225

94.

Knoll

(2019, December 5). Graduate students do the real work. Let us unionize. Undark. https://undark.org/2019/12/05/graduate-student-union

95.

Kreighbaum

(2019, October 15). HBCUs plan cuts after Congress misses funding deadline. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2019/10/15/hbcus-plan-cuts-after-congress-misses-funding-deadline

96.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Pierro

Mannetti

De Grada

(2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84–100.

97.

Kunda

(1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.

98.

Ledgerwood

(2019). New developments in research methods. In Finkel

E. J.

Baumeister

R. F.

(Eds.), Advanced Social Psychology (pp. 39-61). Oxford University Press.

99.

Lee

(2019, August 14). How America’s vast racial wealth gap grew: By plunder. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/racial-wealth-gap.html

100.

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. (2020). Open communication science: A primer on why and some recommendations for how. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(2), 71–82.

101.

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. (2021). Can we achieve “equality” when we have different understandings of its meaning? How contexts and identities shape the pursuit of egalitarian goals. Psychological Inquiry, 32(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2021.1971441

102.

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. (in press). What counts as good science? How the battle for methodological legitimacy affects public psychology. American Psychologist.

103.

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. Wai

(2021). Communicating what we know, and what isn’t so: Science communication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620964062

104.

Lick

D. J.

Johnson

K. L.

(2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000052

105.

Livingston

R. W.

(2020, September 1). How to promote racial equity in the workplace. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/09/how-to-promote-racial-equity-in-the-workplace

106.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265–268. https://doi.org/1037/amp0000870

107.

Logan

J. R.

Minca

Adar

(2012). The geography of inequality: Why separate means unequal in American public schools. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711431588

108.

Long

Frederiksen

Ranji

Salganicoff

(2021). Women’s health care utilization and costs: Findings from the 2020 KFF Women’s Health Survey. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/womens-health-care-utilization-and-costs-findings-from-the-2020-kff-womens-health-survey

109.

Lorde

(1984). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In Sister outsider: Essays and speeches (pp. 110–114). Crossing Press. https://collectiveliberation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Lorde_The_Masters_Tools.pdf

110.

Luce

R. D.

(1995). Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 1–26.

111.

Ludy

B. T.

(2018). A brief history of modern psychology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

112.

D. S.

Correll

Wittenbrink

(2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135.

113.

Maier

S. U.

Makwana

A. B.

Hare

T. A.

(2015). Acute stress impairs self-control in goal-directed choice by altering multiple functional connections within the brain’s decision circuits. Neuron, 87(3), 621–631.

114.

Malisch

J. L.

Harris

B. N.

Sherrer

S. M.

Lewis

K. A.

Shepherd

S. L.

McCarthy

P. C.

Spott

J. L.

Karam

E. P.

Moustaid-Moussa

Calarco

J. M.

Ramalingam

Talley

A. E.

Cañas-Carrell

J. E.

Ardon-Dryer

Weiser

D. A.

Bernal

X. E.

Deitloff

(2020). Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(27), 15378–15381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010636117

115.

Martin

A. R.

Kanai

Kamatani

Okada

Neale

B. M.

Daly

M. J.

(2019). Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nature Genetics, 51(4), 584–591.

116.

Matthew

P. A.

(2016a). What is faculty diversity worth to a university? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/11/what-is-faculty-diversity-worth-to-a-university/508334

117.

Matthew

P. A.

(Ed.). (2016b). Written/unwritten: Diversity and the hidden truths of tenure. University of North Carolina Press.

118.

Matthews

(2020, June 25). Pandemic lockdown holding back female academics, data show. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/pandemic-lockdown-holding-back-female-academics-data-show

119.

McCormick-Huhn

Warner

L. R.

Settles

I. H.

Shields

S. A.

(2019). What if psychology took intersectionality seriously? Changing how psychologists think about participants. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 445–456.

120.

McKiernan

E. C.

Bourne

P. E.

Brown

C. T.

Buck

Kenall

Lin

McDougall

Nosek

B. A.

Ram

Soderberg

C. K.

Spies

J. R.

Thaney

Updegrove

Woo

K. H.

Yarkoni

(2016). Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, Article e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800

121.

Milkman

K. L.

Akinola

Chugh

(2012). Temporal distance and discrimination: An audit study in academia. Psychological Science, 23(7), 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434539

122.

Mitchell

Martin

(2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(3), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800001X

123.

Mosley

D. V.

Hargons

C. N.

Meiller

Angyal

Wheeler

Davis

Stevens-Watkins

(2021). Critical consciousness of anti-Black racism: A practical model to prevent and resist racial trauma. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(1), 1–16.

124.

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Dovidio

J. F.

Brescoll

V. L.

Graham

M. J.

Handelsman

(2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109

125.

Murphy

M. C.

Mejia

A. F.

Mejia

Yan

Cheryan

Dasgupta

Destin

Fryberg

S. A.

Garcia

J. A.

Haines

E. L.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Ledgerwood

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Park

L. E.

Perry

S. P.

Ratliff

K. A.

Rattan

Sanchez

D. T.

Savani

. . . Pestilli

(2020). Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(39), 24154–24164.

126.

Myers

K. R.

Tham

W. Y.

Yin

Cohodes

Thursby

J. G.

Thursby

M. C.

Schiffer

Walsh

J. T.

Lakhani

K. R.

Wang

(2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 880–883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y

127.

Navarro

D. J.

(2021). If mathematical psychology did not exist we might need to invent it: A comment on theory building in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620974769

128.

Nelson

L. D.

Simmons

J. P.

Simonsohn

(2012). Let’s publish fewer papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 291–293.

129.

Nielsen

Haun

Kärtner

Legare

C. H.

(2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38.

130.

Northwestern University Department of African American Studies. (2020, October 20). [Letter to President Morton Schapiro]. https://afam.northwestern.edu/documents/afam-email-to-president-schapiro.pdf

131.

Obasi

A. I.

(2020). Equity in excellence or just another tax on Black skin? Lancet, 396(10252), 651–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31536-1

132.

Onie

(2020). Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature, 587(7832), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3

133.

Onyeador

I. N.

Hudson

S. T. J.

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. (2021). Moving beyond implicit bias training: Policy insights for increasing organizational diversity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220983840

134.

Padilla

A. M.

(1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27.

135.

Parry

(2020, July 5). Colleges are in for a racial reckoning. Name changes are only the beginning. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/colleges-are-in-for-a-racial-reckoning-decisions-about-renaming-are-only-the-beginning

136.

Payne

B. K.

Vuletich

H. A.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

(2019). Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116(24), 11693–11698.

137.

Pennycook

Thompson

V. A.

(2018). An analysis of the Canadian cognitive psychology job market (2006–2016). Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 72(2), 71–80.

138.

Pickett

(2017, April 12). Let’s look at the big picture: A system-level approach to assessing scholarly merit. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tv6nb

139.

Pratto

Stewart

A. L.

(2012). Group dominance and the half-blindness of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 28–45.

140.

Purdie-Vaughns

Eibach

R. P.

(2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4

141.

Ranji

Frederiksen

Salganicoff

Long

(2021). Women, work, and family during COVID-19: Findings from the KFF Women’s Health Survey. https://www.kff.org/report-section/women-work-and-family-during-covid-19-findings-from-the-kff-womens-health-survey-methodology

142.

Reid

R. A.

Curry

T. A.

(2019, April 12). The White man template and academic bias. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2019/04/12/how-white-male-template-produces-barriers-minority-scholars-throughout-their

143.

Remedios

J. D.

Snyder

S. H.

(2015). Where do we go from here? Toward an inclusive and intersectional literature of multiple stigmatization. Sex Roles, 73, 408–413.

144.

Richeson

(2020, July 27). Americans are determined to believe in Black progress. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/the-mythology-of-racial-progress/614173

145.

Rideau

(2021). “We’re just not acknowledged”: An examination of the identity taxation of full-time non-tenure-track Women of Color faculty members. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000139

146.

Risen

(2015, April 30). American Psychological Association bolstered C.I.A. torture program, report says. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/01/us/report-says-american-psychological-association-collaborated-on-torture-justification.html

147.

Roberson

Q. M.

(2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31, 212–236.

148.

Roberts

S. O.

Bareket-Shavit

Dollins

F. A.

Goldie

P. D.

Mortenson

(2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709

149.

Robertson

Gebeloff

(2020, April 18). How millions of women became the most essential workers in America. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/18/us/coronavirus-women-essential-workers.html

150.

Rothstein

(2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. W. W. Norton & Company.

151.

Rothstein

(2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America.

152.

Roux

Goldsmith

Bonezzi

(2015). On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 615–631.

153.

Roy

(2020, April 3). The pandemic is a portal. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/10d8f5e8-74eb-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca

154.

Rozin

(2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward?: A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.x

155.

Salter

P. S.

Adams

Perez

M. J.

(2018). Racism in the structure of everyday worlds: A cultural-psychological perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417724239

156.

Salter

Adams

(2013). Toward a critical race psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12068

157.

Serano

(2009, June 12). Psychology, sexualization and trans-invalidations [Conference session]. Keynote lecture presented at the 8th Annual Philadelphia Trans-Health Conference. http://www.juliaserano.com/av/Serano-TransInvalidations.pdf

158.

Sheskin

Scott

Mills

C. M.

Bergelson

Bonawitz

Spelke

E. S.

Fei-Fei

Keil

F. C.

Gweon

Tenenbaum

J. B.

Jara-Ettinger

Adolph

K. E.

Rhodes

Frank

M. C.

Mehr

S. A.

Schulz

(2020). Online developmental science to foster innovation, access, and impact. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 675–678.

159.

Shortlidge

E. E.

Eddy

S. L.

(2018). The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth? PLOS ONE, 13(6), Article e0199576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576

160.

Skitka

L. J.

Melton

Z. J.

Mueller

A. B.

Wei

K. Y.

(2021). The gender gap: Who is (and is not) included on graduate-level syllabi in social/personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(6), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220947326

161.

Social Sciences Feminist Network Research Interest Group. (2017). The burden of invisible work in academia: Social inequalities and time use in five university departments. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 1(39), 228–245. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/hjsr/vol1/iss39/21

162.

Society for Personality and Social Psychology. (2019). Member diversity statistics. https://www.spsp.org/sites/default/files/Member-Diversity-Statistics-December-2019.pdf

163.

Society for Personality and Social Psychology. (2020). Diversity graduate registration award. https://www.spsp.org/awards/travel-awards/diversity-fund-graduate-travel-award

164.

Solnit

(2020, July 13). Rebecca Solnit: The slow road to sudden change. https://lithub.com/rebecca-solnit-before-the-uprising-comes-the-work

165.

Somerville

L. H.

(2018, November 20). What can we learn from Dartmouth? Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.aaw1370

166.

Squazzoni

Bravo

Grimaldo

Garcıa-Costa

Farjam

Mehmani

(2021). No tickets for women in the COVID-19 race? A study on manuscript submissions and reviews in 2347 Elsevier journals during the pandemic. PLOS ONE 16(10), Article e0257919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257919

167.

Srivastava

(2019, July 9). Will this time be different? PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9e275

168.

Stengers

(2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. John Wiley & Sons.

169.

Stephens

N. M.

Fryberg

S. A.

Markus

H. R.

Johnson

C. S.

Covarrubias

(2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.

170.

Stewart

(2020, April 23). Essential workers are taking care of America. Are we taking care of them? Vox. https://www.vox.com/covid-19-coronavirus-explainers/2020/4/23/21228971/essential-workers-stories-coronavirus-hazard-pay-stimulus-covid-19

171.

Syed

(2017). Why traditional metrics may not adequately represent ethnic minority psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1162–1165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617709590

172.

Syed

(2021, February 9–13). It’s 2 × 2 designs all the way down: Social psychology’s over-reliance on experiments needlessly restricts diversity in the field [Conference session]. Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, United States. https://psyarxiv.com/u89e2/

173.

Syed

Kathawalla

(2020, February 25). Cultural psychology, diversity, and representation in open science. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2

174.

Tenney

Costa

Allard

Vazire

(2021). Open science and reform practices in organizational behavior research over time (2011 to 2019). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.015

175.

Thalmayer

A. G.

Toscanelli

Arnett

J. J.

(2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000622

176.

Townsend

B. K.

LaPaglia

(2000). Are we marginalized within academe? Perceptions of two-year college faculty. Community College Review, 28(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155210002800103

177.

Turner

C. S. V.

(2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 74–93.

178.

UC Davis Academic Affairs. (n.d.). STEAD faculty search committee workshops. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://academicaffairs.ucdavis.edu/stead

179.

Warner

L. R.

Settles

I. H.

Shields

S. A.

(2018). Intersectionality theory in the psychology of women. In Travis

C. B.

White

J. W.

Rutherford

Williams

W. S.

Cook

S. L.

Wyche

K. F.

(Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 521–539). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-027

180.

Whitaker

Guest

(2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-33/november-2020/bropenscience-broken-science

181.

Wilkins

C. L.

Hirsch

A. A.

Kaiser

C. R.

Inkles

M. P.

(2016). The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 801–812.

182.

Wilkins

C. L.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446.

183.

Wilkinson

M. D.

Dumontier

Aalbersberg

I. J.

Appleton

Axton

Baak

Blomberg

Boiten

J. W.

da Silva Santos

L. B.

Bourne

P. E.

Bouwman

Brookes

A. J.

Clark

Crosas

Dillo

Dumon

Edmunds

Evelo

C. T.

Finkers

. . . Mons

(2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

184.

Williams

J. C.

(2014). Double jeopardy? An empirical study with implications for the debates over implicit bias and intersectionality. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 37, 186–242.

185.

Wilson

(1995). The academic man: A study in the sociology of a profession (1st ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 1942)

186.

Wolfram

Wang

Hembree

Park

(2020). Open peer review: Promoting transparency in open science. Scientometrics, 125, 1033–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4

187.

Zimmerman

C. A.

Carter-Sowell

A. R.

(2016). Examining workplace ostracism experiences in academia: Understanding how differences in the faculty ranks influence inclusive climates on campus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00753

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB