The ironic effect of thought suppression refers to the phenomenon in which individuals trying to rid their mind of a target thought ironically experience greater levels of occurrence and accessibility of the thought compared with individuals who deliberately concentrate on the thought (Wegner, 1994, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34). Ironic effects occurring after thought suppression, also known as rebound effects, were consistently detected by previous meta-analyses. However, ironic effects that occur during thought suppression, also known as immediate enhancement effects, were found to be largely absent. In this meta-analysis, we test Wegner’s original proposition that detection of immediate enhancement effects depends on the cognitive load experienced by individuals when enacting thought suppression. Given that thought suppression is an effortful cognitive process, we propose that the introduction of additional cognitive load would compete for the allocation of existing cognitive resources and impair capacity for thought suppression. Studies (k = 31) consistent with Wegner’s original thought-suppression paradigm were analyzed. Consistent with our predictions, rebound effects were observed regardless of cognitive load, whereas immediate enhancement effects were observed only in the presence of cognitive load. We discuss implications in light of ironic-process theory and suggest future thought-suppression research.
AbramowitzJ. S.TolinD. F.StreetG. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 683–703. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00057-X
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
*AnderssonG.JurisL.ClassonE.FredriksonM.FurmarkT. (2006). Consequences of suppressing thoughts about tinnitus and the effects of cognitive distraction on brain activity in tinnitus patients. Audiology and Neurotology, 11, 301–309. doi:10.1159/000094460
4.
AnsfieldM. E.WegnerD. M.BowserR. (1996). Ironic effects of sleep urgency. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 523–531. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(96)00031-9
5.
BarghJ. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Wyer, Jr.R. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
*BatesD. E. (2006). The cognitive and affective repercussions of thought suppression following negative personal feedback (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin.
7.
BeeversC. G.MeyerB. (2008). I feel fine but the glass is still half empty: Thought suppression biases information processing despite recovery from a dysphoric mood state. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 323–332. doi:10.1007/s10608-006-9108-8
8.
*BeharE.VescioT. K.BorkovecT. D. (2005). The effects of suppressing thoughts and images about worrisome stimuli. Behavior Therapy, 36, 289–298. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80077-2
9.
*BlechmanL. T. (2002). Ironic processes in the mental control of obsessive thinking in obsessive-compulsive disorder (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fordham University, New York, NY.
10.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
*BourdonN.McKelvieS. J.StoutD. (2001). Extraversion and the rebound effect after thought suppression. Psychological Reports, 88, 1119–1120. doi:10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1119
12.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
13.
ButlerA. J.JamesK. H. (2010). The neural correlates of attempting to suppress negative versus neutral memories. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 182–194. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.2.182
14.
CarterE. C.KoflerL. M.ForsterD. E.McCulloughM. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796–815. doi:10.1037/xge0000083
15.
CarterE. C.SchönbrodtF. D.HilgardJ.GervaisW. M. (2017). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Retrieved from http://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/9h3nu
16.
*CioffiD.HollowayJ. (1993). Delayed costs of suppressed pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 274–282. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.274
17.
ClarkD. M.BallS.PapeD. (1991). An experimental investigation of thought suppression. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 29, 253–257. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(91)90115-J
18.
CochranW. G. (1952). The chi-square test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 315–345. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177692778
19.
DenzlerM.ForsterJ.LibermanN.RozenmanM. (2010). Thirsty, aggressive and funny: A motivational inference model (MIMO) account to behavioral rebound. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1385–1396. doi:10.1177/0146167210382663
20.
EggerM.SmithD. G.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
21.
ErberR.WegnerD. M. (1996). Ruminations on the rebound. In WyerR. S., Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 73–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
*ErskineJ. (2008). Resistance can be futile: Investigating behavioural rebound. Appetite, 50, 415–421. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.006
23.
ErskineJ.GeorgiouG. J. (2010). Effects of thought suppression on eating behaviour in restrained and non-restrained eaters. Appetite, 54, 499–503. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.02.001
24.
ErskineJ.GeorgiouG. J.KvavilashviliL. (2010). I suppress, therefore I smoke: Effects of thought suppression on smoking behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1225–1230. doi:10.1177/095,6797610378687
25.
*GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2007). Further ironies of suppression: Stereotype and counterstereotype accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 833–841. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.09.001
26.
*GilhoolyK. J.GeorgiouG. J.SirotaM.Paphiti-GaleanoA. (2015). Incubation and suppression processes in creative problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21, 130–146. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.953581
27.
GillieB. L.VaseyM. W.ThayerJ. F. (2015). Individual differences in heart rate variability moderates thought suppression success. Psychophysiology, 52, 1149–1160. doi:10.1111/psyp.12443
28.
*GiulianoR. J.WichaN. Y. (2010). Why the white bear is still there: Electrophysiological evidence for ironic semantic activation during thought suppression. Brain Research, 1316, 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.041
29.
*GuinoteA. (2007). Power and the suppression of unwanted thoughts: Does control over others decrease control over the self?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 433–440. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.003
30.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2014). It is premature to regard the ego-depletion effect as ‘too incredible’. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 298. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00298
31.
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525. doi:10.1037/a0019486
32.
*HedtJ. M. (2005). Disclosure versus suppression of intrusive thoughts: A study of sexually assaulted women (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Idaho State University, Pocatello.
33.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186
34.
HoustonC. E.WegnerD. M. (1993, April). Believe it or not: Ironic processes in belief formation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Arlington, TX.
35.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
KayA. C.DayM. V.ZannaM. P.NussbaumA. D. (2013). The insidious (and ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 287–291. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.003
37.
LitvinE. B.KovacsM. A.HayesP. L.BrandonT. H. (2012). Responding to tobacco craving: Experimental test of acceptance versus suppression. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 830–837. doi:10.1037/a0030351
38.
*LoweryN. G. (2002). Suppression of intrusive thoughts in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and a non-clinical sample (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tulsa, OK.
39.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V.MilneA. B.FordR. L. (1997). On the regulation of recollection: The intentional forgetting of stereotypical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 709–719. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.709
40.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V.MilneA. B.JettenJ. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808–817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808
41.
MageeJ. C.HardenK. P.TeachmanB. A. (2012). Psychopathology and thought suppression: A quantitative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 189–201. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.001
42.
*MageeJ. C.ZinbargR. E. (2007). Suppressing and focusing on a negative memory in social anxiety: Effects on unwanted thoughts and mood. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2836–2849. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.05.003
43.
MalinowskiJ. (2017). High thought suppressors dream more of their negative waking-life experiences than low thought suppressors. Dreaming, 27, 269–277. doi:10.1037/drm0000061
44.
*MatthewsA.MilroyR. (1994). Effects of priming and suppression of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 843–850. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90164-3
45.
*MerckelbachH.MurisP.Van den HoutM.de JongP. (1991). Rebound effects of thought suppression: Instruction dependent?Behavioral Psychotherapy, 19, 225–238. doi:10.1017/S0141347300013264
46.
MitchellJ. P.HeathertonT. F.KelleyW. M.WylandC. L.WegnerD. M.MacraeC. (2007). Separating sustained from transient aspects of cognitive control during thought suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 292–297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01891.x
47.
MuravenM.TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774
48.
*MurisP.de JonghA.MerckelbachH.PostemaS.VetM. (1998). Thought suppression in phobic and non-phobic dental patients. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 11, 275–287. doi:10.1080/10615809808248315
49.
NajmiS.RiemannB. C.WegnerD. M. (2009). Managing unwanted intrusive thoughts in obsessive compulsive disorder: Relative effectiveness of suppression, distraction, and acceptance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 494–503. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.015
50.
NoreenS.O’ConnorA. R.MacLeodM. D. (2016). Neural correlates of direct and indirect suppression of autobiographical memories. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 379. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00379
51.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In SolsoR. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
PurdonC.ClarkD. A. (2000). White bears and other elusive intrusions: Assessing the relevance of thought suppression for obsessional phenomena. Behavior Modification, 24, 425–453. doi:10.1177/0145445500243008
53.
PurdonC.ClarkD. A. (2001). Suppression of obsession-like thoughts in nonclinical individuals: Impact on thought frequency, appraisal and mood state. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 1163–1181. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00092-9
54.
PurdonC.RowaK.AntonyM. M. (2005). Thought suppression and its effects on thought frequency, appraisal and mood state in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 93–108. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.11.007
55.
QuartanaP. J.BurnsJ. W. (2007). Painful consequences of anger suppression. Emotion, 7, 400–414. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.400
56.
RachmanS. J.de SilvaP. (1978). Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 233–248. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(78)90022-0
57.
*RaffieldT. J. (1998). Individual differences in the Wegner rebound effect (Master’s thesis). University of Louisville, KY.
58.
*RassinE.MurisP.JongJ.BruinG. (2005). Summoning white bears or letting them free: The influence of the content of control instructions on target thought frequency. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 253–258. doi:10.1007/s10862-005-2405-9
59.
RaudenbushS. W. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: Random effects models. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 295–315). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
60.
RayJ. W.ShadishW. R. (1996). How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1316–1325. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1316
61.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
62.
*RoemerL. (1995). An investigation of the effects of suppressing and expressing anxious material among worriers and non-worriers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
63.
*RoemerL.BorkovecT. D. (1994). Effects of suppressing thoughts about emotional material. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 467–474. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.3.467
64.
*RutledgeP. C. (1998). Obsessionality and the attempted suppression of unpleasant personal intrusive thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 403–416. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00018-7
65.
*RutledgeP. C.HancockR. A.RutledgeJ. H. (1996). Predictors of thought rebound. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 555–562. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(96)00021-6
66.
*RutledgeP. C.HollenbergD.HancockR. A. (1993). Individual differences in the Wegner rebound effect: Evidence for a moderator variable in thought rebound following thought suppression. Psychological Reports, 72, 867–880. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3.867
67.
SchenkerN.GentlemanJ. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55, 182–186. doi:10.1198/000313001317097960
68.
*SlepianM. L.OikawaM.SmythJ. M. (2014). Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 31–39. doi:10.1111/jasp.12197
69.
StanleyT. D. (2017). Limitations of PET-PEESE and other meta-analysis methods. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 8, 581–591. doi:10.1177/1948550617693062
70.
StanleyT. D.DoucouliagosH. C. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 60–78. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1095
71.
*TongE. M. W.AngM.ChuaA. S. Y. (2013). The attitudinal consequences of thought suppression: A focus on thinness thoughts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 64–82. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02042.x
72.
*TrinderH.SalkovskisP. M. (1994). Personally relevant intrusions outside the laboratory: Long-term suppression increases intrusion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 833–842. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90163-5
73.
VeronikiA. A.JacksonD.ViechtbauerW.BenderR.BowdenJ.KnappG.. . . SalantiG. (2015). Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 55–79. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1164
74.
ViechtbauerW. (2005). Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30, 261–293. doi:10.3102/10769986030003261
75.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
76.
WangD.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.HaggerM. S. (2017). Mechanisms underlying effective thought suppression using focused-distraction strategies: A self-determination theory approach. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 367–380. doi:10.1037/cns0000138
77.
WangD.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.HaggerM. S. (2018). Why distractors with need-supportive content can mitigate ironic effects of thought suppression. Motivation and Emotion, 42, 214–224. doi:10.1007/s11031-017-9653-3
78.
WegnerD. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34
79.
WegnerD. M. (2009). How to think, say, or do precisely the worst thing for any occasion. Science, 325, 48–50. doi:10.1126/science.1167346
80.
*WegnerD. M.ErberR. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 903–912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.903
81.
WegnerD. M.ErberR.ZanakosS. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093–1104. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1093
82.
*WegnerD. M.GoldD. B. (1995). Fanning old flames: Emotional and cognitive effects of suppressing thoughts of a past relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 782–792. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.782
83.
*WegnerD. M.SchneiderD. J.CarterS.WhiteT. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.5
84.
*WegnerD. M.SchneiderD. J.KnutsonB.McMahonS. R. (1991). Polluting the stream of consciousness: The effect of thought suppression on the mind’s environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 141–152. doi:10.1007/BF01173204
85.
WegnerD. M.ShorttJ. W.BlakeA. W.PageM. S. (1990). The suppression of exciting thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 409–418. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.409
86.
WenzlaffR. M.WegnerD. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 59–91. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59
87.
WenzlaffR. M.WegnerD. M.RoperD. W. (1988). Depression and mental control: The resurgence of unwanted negative thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 882–892. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.882
88.
WylandC. L.KelleyW. M.MacraeC. N.GordonH. L.HeathertonT. F. (2003). Neural correlates of thought suppression. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1863–1867. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
