Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ability to control one’s thoughts is crucial for attention, focus, ideation, and mental well-being. Although there is a long history of research into thought control, the inherent subjectivity of thoughts has made objective examination, and thus mechanistic understanding, difficult. Here, we report a novel method to objectively investigate thought-control success and failure by measuring the sensory strength of visual thoughts using binocular rivalry, a perceptual illusion. Across five experiments (N = 67), we found that thought-control failure may occur because of the involuntary and antithetical formation of nonreportable sensory representations during attempts at thought suppression but not during thought substitution. Notably, thought control was worse in individuals with high levels of anxiety and schizotypy but more successful in mindful individuals. Overall, our study offers insight into the underlying mechanisms of thought control and suggests that individual differences play an important role in the ability to control thoughts.

Keywords

thought suppression thought substitution binocular rivalry mental imagery mindfulness open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alais

Blake

(2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Benjamini

Hochberg

(1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B: Methodological, 57, 289–300.

Boynton

G. M.

Engel

S. A.

Glover

G. H.

Heeger

D. J.

(1996). Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4207–4221.

Brainard

D. H.

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

Brown

K. W.

Ryan

R. M.

(2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

Chang

Lewis

D. E.

Pearson

(2013). The functional effects of color perception and color imagery. Journal of Vision, 13(10), Article 4. doi:10.1167/13.10.4

Chapman

L. J.

Chapman

J. P.

(1973). Disordered thought in schizophrenia. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Chiou

Rich

A. N.

Rogers

Pearson

(2018). Exploring the functional nature of synaesthetic colour: Dissociations from colour perception and imagery. Cognition, 177, 107–121.

Foa

E. B.

Huppert

J. D.

Leiberg

Langner

Kichic

Hajcak

Salkovskis

P. M.

(2002). The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: Development and validation of a short version. Psychological Assessment, 14, 485–496.

10.

Freeston

M. H.

Dugas

M. J.

Ladouceur

(1996). Thoughts, images, worry, and anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 265–273.

11.

Giuliano

R. J.

Wicha

N. Y.

(2010). Why the white bear is still there: Electrophysiological evidence for ironic semantic activation during thought suppression. Brain Research, 1316, 62–74.

12.

Goodyear

B. G.

Menon

R. S.

(1998). Effect of luminance contrast on BOLD fMRI response in human primary visual areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 2204–2207.

13.

Hirsch

C. R.

Holmes

E. A.

(2007). Mental imagery in anxiety disorders. Psychiatry, 6, 161–165.

14.

Hubel

D. H.

Wiesel

T. N.

(1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 148, 574–591.

15.

Keogh

Pearson

(2011). Mental imagery and visual working memory. PLOS ONE, 6(12), Article e29221. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029221

16.

Keogh

Pearson

(2014). The sensory strength of voluntary visual imagery predicts visual working memory capacity. Journal of Vision, 14(12), Article 7. doi:10.1167/14.12.7

17.

Keogh

Pearson

(2017). The perceptual and phenomenal capacity of mental imagery. Cognition, 162, 124–132.

18.

Keogh

Pearson

(2018). The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia. Cortex, 105, 53–60.

19.

Kosslyn

S. M.

Brunn

Cave

K. R.

Wallach

R. W.

(1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18, 195–243.

20.

Kulik

C. T.

Perry

E. L.

Bourhis

A. C.

(2000). Ironic evaluation processes: Effects of thought suppression on evaluations of older job applicants. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 689–711.

21.

Lavy

E. H.

van den Hout

M. A.

(2009). Thought suppression induces intrusions. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 18, 251–258.

22.

Lin

Y. J.

Wicker

F. W.

(2007). A comparison of the effects of thought suppression, distraction and concentration. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2924–2937.

23.

Mason

Claridge

Jackson

(1995). New scales for the assessment of schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(1), 7–13.

24.

Mitchell

J. P.

Heatherton

T. F.

Kelley

W. M.

Wyland

C. L.

Wegner

D. M.

Neil Macrae

(2007). Separating sustained from transient aspects of cognitive control during thought suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 292–297.

25.

Oertel

Rotarska-Jagiela

van de Ven

Haenschel

Grube

Stangier

. . . Linden

D. E.

(2009). Mental imagery vividness as a trait marker across the schizophrenia spectrum. Psychiatry Research, 167, 1–11.

26.

Pearson

(2014). New directions in mental-imagery research: The binocular-rivalry technique and decoding fMRI patterns. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 178–183.

27.

Pearson

Clifford

C. W.

Tong

(2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology, 18, 982–986.

28.

Pearson

Naselaris

Holmes

E. A.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2015). Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 590–602.

29.

Petrie

K. J.

Booth

R. J.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(1998). The immunological effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1264–1272.

30.

Purdon

Clark

D. A.

(2002). The need to control thoughts. In Frost

R. O.

Steketee

(Eds.), Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 29–43). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

31.

Rachman

de Silva

(1978). Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 233–248.

32.

Sherwood

Pearson

(2010). Closing the mind’s eye: Incoming luminance signals disrupt visual imagery. PLOS ONE, 5(12), Article e15217. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015217

33.

Slotnick

S. D.

Thompson

W. L.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2005). Visual mental imagery induces retinotopically organized activation of early visual areas. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1570–1583.

34.

Spielberger

C. D.

(1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

35.

Stone

A. A.

(2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

36.

Wegner

D. M.

(1989). White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. London, England: Penguin Press.

37.

Wegner

D. M.

(1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.

38.

Wegner

D. M.

Schneider

D. J.

Carter

S. R.

III White

T. L.

(1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.84 MB

0.58 MB

Measuring Thought-Control Failure: Sensory Mechanisms and Individual Differences

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material