Toward an Evo-Devo Theory of Reproductive Strategy,Health,and Longevity

Abstract

Rickard and associates (2014, this issue) challenge the theoretical claim that early developmental experiences influence sexual development and behavior as a result of the continuity of early- and later-life environments over the course of human history (Belsky, Steinberg, & Draper, 1991). Instead, they contend that sexual development, health, and longevity are regulated by internal (bodily) state reflective of morbidity and mortality risk. By highlighting the importance of internal state—and thereby underscoring the value of focusing on it and on the external environment early in life—these theoreticians continue the tradition of extending a line of human evolutionary–developmental (“evo-devo”) theorizing in important ways. In fact, what they make clear is that what was originally conceived as an evolutionary theory of socialization by Belsky et al. (1991) can and should develop into an evolutionary–developmental life-course theory of reproductive strategy, health, and longevity.

Keywords

evolution reproductive strategy predictive adaptive response psychosocial acceleration theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bateson

(2008). Preparing offspring for future conditions is adaptive. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 19, 111.

Belsky

(1997). Variation in susceptibility to environmental influences: An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182–186.

Belsky

(2000). Conditional and alternative reproductive strategies: Individual differences in susceptibility to rearing experience. In Rodgers

Rowe

Miller

(Eds.), Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biological and behavioral sciences (pp. 127–146). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

Belsky

(2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influence: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence. In Ellis

Bjorklund

(Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 139–163). New York, NY: Guilford.

Belsky

(2007). Childhood experiences and reproductive strategies. In Dunbar

Barrett

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 237–254) Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Belsky

(2012). The development of human reproductive strategies: Progress and prospects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 310–316.

Belsky

Pluess

(2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908.

Belsky

Steinberg

Draper

(1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.

Chisholm

(1993). Death, hope and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies. Current Anthropology, 34, 1–24.

10.

Chisholm

J. S.

(1999). Death, hope and sex. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Del Giudice

. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.

12.

Del Giudice

Ellis

B. J.

Shirtcliff

E. A.

(2011). The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1562–1592.

13.

Ellis

B. J.

(2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: An integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920–958.

14.

Ellis

B. J.

Del Giudice

Shirtcliff

E. A.

(2013). Beyond allostatic load: The stress response system as a mechanism of conditional adaptation. In Beauchaine

T. P.

Hinshaw

S. P.

(Eds.), Child and adolescent psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 251–284). New York, NY: Wiley.

15.

Ellis

B. J.

Figueredo

A. J.

Brumbach

B. H.

Schlomer

G. L.

(2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk. Human Nature, 20, 204–268.

16.

Ellis

B. J.

Garber

(2000). Psychosocial antecedents of variation in girls’ pubertal timing: Maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress. Child Development, 71, 485–501.

17.

Frankenhuis

W. E.

Panchanathan

(2011). Individual differences in developmental plasticity may result from stochastic sampling. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 336–347.

18.

Gluckman

P. D.

Hanson

M. A.

Spencer

H. G.

(2005). Predictive adaptive responses and human evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 527–533.

19.

James

Ellis

B. J.

Schlomer

G. L.

Garber

(2012). Sex-specific pathways to early puberty, sexual debut, and sexual risk taking: Tests of an integrated evolutionary-developmental model. Developmental Psychology, 48, 687–702.

20.

Nettle

Frankenhuis

W. E.

Rickard

I. J.

(2013). The evolution of predictive adaptive responses in human life history. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.23v1. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1343

21.

Rickard

I. J.

Frankenhuis

W. E.

Nettle

(2014). Why are childhood family factors associated with timing of maturation: The role for internal prediction. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 9, 3–15.

22.

West-Eberhard

M. J.

(2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.