Abstract
Lewis's review of my book (2011, this issue) repeats widely shared understandings of the nature of addiction and the role that dopamine plays in the persistence of self-destructive drug use. These accounts depict addiction as a chronic relapsing disease and claim that drug-induced changes in dopamine function explain the transition from drug experimentation to compulsive drug use. In my book, I test the idea that addiction is a chronic, persistent state. Lewis fails to mention the results of the various tests, although they provide a handy test for his account of addiction and are surprising in light of the common verbal formula “addiction is a chronic, relapsing disease.” Consequently, I review a few of the key findings in this response. Lewis faults me for not giving enough attention to dopamine. In my book, I conclude that there is more to the biology of addiction than dopamine, and in this response, I describe research that tests the idea that drug-induced increases in dopamine markedly reduce an individual’s capacity to choose nondrug reinforcers. In one experiment, rats readily gave up cocaine for saccharin, even when they had been consuming massive amounts of the drug for weeks. Put more generally, well-established research results call for a revision of currently accepted understandings of addiction and the role that dopamine plays in drug use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
