Higher education (HE) presents a valuable research context due to the increasing market orientation of institutions, with students playing an active role as decision-making agents. Faced with growing competition, higher education institutions (HEIs) have embraced business-oriented approaches to ensure their long-term sustainability and expansion. Developing effective marketing communication strategies is therefore essential for building a strong brand identity and engagement. This article conducts a bibliometric review on marketing communication in HEIs, identifying dominant trends, areas of interest, and gaps in the literature, thus contributing to the understanding and development of this field. Using performance analysis and science mapping, the study reveals a growing interest in HEIs marketing practices and highlights the impact of digitalization, with a significant shift from traditional to digital communication strategies. This study calls for future research on social media marketing, cultural differences in communication strategies, and the integration of innovative approaches to enrich the academic knowledge and debate.
AakerDA (1996) Building Strong Brands. Free Press.
2.
AgarwalADurairajanayagamDTatagariS, et al. (2016) Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology18(2): 296–309.
3.
Alcaide-PulidoPAlvesHGutiérrez-VillarB (2017) Development of a model to analyze HEI image: a case based on a private and a public university. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education27(2): 162–187.
4.
AlessandriSYangSUKinseyD (2006) An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review9: 258–270.
5.
AriaMCuccurulloC (2017) Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics11(4): 959–975.
6.
BerryLL (1995) Relationship marketing of services—growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science23(4): 236–245.
7.
BirkleCPendleburyDASchnellJ, et al. (2020) Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies1(1): 363–376.
8.
Bonilla QuijadaMRPerea MuñozECorronsA, et al. (2021) Engaging students through social media. Findings for the top five universities in the world. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education32(2): 197–214.
9.
BonnemaJVan der WaldtDLR (2008) Information and source preferences of a student market in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management22(4): 314–327.
10.
BornmannLMutzRDanielHD (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(5): 830–837.
11.
CalderónHFayosTMoreno de CastroB (2019) Are universities aware of all the values that can be co-created in their relations with companies? In ICERI2019 Proceedings, Seville, Spain, 11-13 November, 2019, pp. 313–317.
12.
CallonMCourtialJ-PTurnerWA, et al. (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information22(2): 191–235.
13.
CallonMCourtialJPLavilleF (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research—the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics22: 155–205.
14.
CapriottiPCarretón-BallesterCLosada-DíazJ-C (2024) Analysing the influence of Universities’ content strategy on the level of engagement on social media. Communications Society37(1): 41–60.
15.
CardosoSCarvalhoTSantiagoR (2011) From students to consumers: reflections on the marketisation of Portuguese higher education. European Journal of Education46(2): 271–284.
16.
ChapleoCCarrillo DuránVCastillo DíazA (2011) Do UK universities communicate their brands effectively through their websites?Journal of Marketing for Higher Education21(1): 25–46.
17.
ClarkMFineMBScheuerCL (2016) Relationship quality in higher education marketing: the role of social media engagement. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education27(1): 40–58.
18.
ClemesMGanCGTzu-HuiK (2008) University student satisfaction: an empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education17: 292–325.
19.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAGHerrera-ViedmaE, et al. (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics5(1): 146–166.
20.
CodinaLMorales-VargasARodríguez-MartínezR, et al. (2020) Use of scopus and web of science to research and evaluate social communication: comparative analysis and characterization. Index Comunicación Journal10(3): 235–261.
21.
ConstantinidesEZinck StagnoMC (2011) Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: a segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education21(1): 7–24.
22.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
23.
DonthuNKumarSMukherjeeD, et al. (2021) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research133: 285–296.
24.
EgerLEgerováDTomczykL, et al. (2020) Facebook for public relations in the higher education field: a study from four countries Czechia, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education31(2): 240–260.
25.
EgerLEgerováDTomczykŁ, et al. (2021) How universities communicate with public using Facebook page. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy6: 88–99.
26.
EllegaardOWallinJA (2015) The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?Scientometrics105: 1809–1831.
27.
EnacheIC (2011) Marketing higher education using the 7p’s framework. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov4(1): 23–30.
28.
ForoudiPDinnieKKitchenPJMelewarTCForoudiMM (2017) IMC antecedents and the consequences of planned brand identity in higher education. European Journal of Marketing51(3): 528–550. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2015-0527
29.
FrasquetMCalderónHCerveraA (2012) University-industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: an empirical analysis in a Spanish university. Higher Education64(1): 85–98.
30.
FreemanRE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
31.
GaiLXuCPeltonLE (2016) A netnographic analysis of prospective international students’ decision-making process: implications for institutional branding of American universities in the emerging markets. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education26(2): 181–198.
32.
GarfieldE (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association295: 90–93.
33.
GatfieldTJBarkerMGrahamP (1999) Measuring communication impact for university advertising materials. Corporate communications. International Journal4: 73–79.
34.
Gordon-IsasiJNarvaizaLGibajaJJ (2021) Revisiting integrated marketing communication (IMC): a scale to assess IMC in higher education (HE). Journal of Marketing for Higher Education31(1): 58–90.
35.
GreenacreMBlasiusJ (2006) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
36.
GrönroosC (1994) From marketing mix to relationship marketing: towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision32(2): 4–20.
37.
HaiLNguyenQ (2022) The influence of website quality on brand trust and satisfaction of students: a case study of universities in Vietnam. International Journal of Data and Network Science6: 1403–1412.
38.
Hemsley-BrownJOplatkaI (2006) Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management19(4): 316–338.
39.
Hemsley-BrownJMelewarTCNguyenB, et al. (2016) Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: a special section. Journal of Business Research69(8): 3019–3022.
40.
HoffmanDLFrankeGR (1986) Correspondence analysis: graphical representation of categorical data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research23(3): 213–227.
41.
HuismanJMampaeyJ (2018) Use your imagination: what UK universities want you to think of them. Oxford Review of Education44(4): 425–440.
42.
HusseyJ (2011) Twitter in higher education: from application to alumni relations. In: WankelLAWankelC (eds) Higher Education Administration with Social Media (Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education, 2). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 249–272.
43.
IsnainiSMusliminAI (2024) The role of AI in enhancing marketing communication: implications for policy and development in Indonesian higher education. Studies in Media and Communication12(4): 10–16.
44.
IvyJ (2008) A new higher education marketing mix: the 7Ps for MBA marketing. International Journal of Educational Management22(4): 288–299.
45.
JainRManishaR (2024) A bibliometric analysis of the impact of digital marketing in higher education. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies19(1): 123–148.
46.
KazoleasDKimYAnne MoffittM (2001) Institutional image: a case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal6(4): 205–216.
47.
KellerKL (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing57(1): 1–22.
KhanamSJoshiRM (2025) Charting the landscape of marketing communication in higher education: a comprehensive thematic review and future research directions. Journal of Marketing Communications1–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2025.2469276
50.
KrachenbergAR (1972) Bringing the concept of marketing to higher education. The Journal of Higher Education43: 369–380.
51.
KrausSBreierMLimWM, et al. (2022) Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science16(8): 2577–2595.
52.
KumarVRamanR (2019) Marketing your business school on social media: analyzing social media content for adopting the right strategies. Journal of Computer Science15(9): 1256–1282.
53.
KumarVReinartzW (2016) Creating enduring customer value. Journal of Marketing80(6): 36–68.
54.
LangrafeTDFBarakatSRStockerF, et al. (2020) A stakeholder theory approach to creating value in higher education institutions. The Bottom Line33(4): 297–313.
55.
LeeY (2019) Understanding parents’ view on US higher education marketing communication. Educational Research for Policy and Practice18: 279–299.
56.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine151(4): 65–94.
57.
LotkaAJ (1926) The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences16(12): 317–323.
58.
Mai ToAMindzakMThongpapanlN, et al. (2022) Social media branding strategies of universities and colleges in Canada: a mixed-method approach investigating post characteristics and contents. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education34(2): 946–966.
59.
ManzoorSRHoJSYAl MahmudA (2020) Revisiting the “university image model” for higher education institutions’ sustainability. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education31(2): 1–20.
60.
MelewarTCAkelS (2005) The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector: a case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal10(1): 41–57.
61.
MenseELemoinePGarretsonC, et al. (2018) The development of global higher education in a world of transformation. Journal of Education and Development2(3): 47.
62.
Miller-IdrissCFriedmanJZAuerbachJ (2019) Jumping, horizon gazing, and arms wide: marketing imagery and the meaning of study abroad in the USA. Higher Education78: 1091–1107.
63.
MingersJLeydesdorffL (2015) A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research246(1): 1–19.
64.
MoedHF (2009) New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis57: 13–18.
65.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine6(7): e1000097.
66.
MorganRMHuntSD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing58(3): 20–38.
67.
NguyenTNDNguyenTTHNguyenTPA, et al. (2022) The information distribution role of Facebook in universities. Journal of Distribution Science20(5): 75–84.
68.
OplatkaIHemsley-BrownJ (2021) A systematic and updated review of the literature on higher education marketing 2005–2019. In: Sinuany-SternZ (ed) Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science in Higher Education. Springer, Vol. 309, pp. 35–80.
69.
Orgilés-AmorósMRuiz MorenoFPenagos-LondoñoGI, et al. (2024) Twitter killed the media star: a historical evolution of marketing communication used by Spanish universities. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing16(1): 48–70.
70.
Osayawe EhigieBTaylorM (2009) Managing students' loyalty to school after graduation through relationship marketing. The TQM Journal21(5): 502–516.
71.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372: n71.
72.
Pérez-BonaventuraMRodríguez-LlorenteC (2023) Activity of universities in social networks. Correlations of rankings, students, followers and interactions. Profesional De La información32(1): Article e320109.
73.
PerutaAShieldsAB (2016) Social media in higher education: understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education27(1): 131–143.
74.
PerutaAShieldsAB (2018) Marketing your university on social media: a content analysis of facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education28(2): 175–191.
75.
PranckutėR (2021) Web of science (WoS) and scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in. Today’s Academic World. Publications9(1): 12.
76.
RamasubramanianSGyureJFMursiNM (2003) Impact of internet images: impression-formation effects of university web site images. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education12(2): 49–68.
77.
Rodríguez RuibalACristinoP (2012) Análisis del uso de las redes sociales en Internet: facebook y twitter en las Universidades españolas. Iconos14: 10.
78.
RutterRLetticeFNadeauJ (2017) Brand personality in higher education: anthropomorphized university marketing communications. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education27(1): 19–39.
79.
SohrabiCFranchiTMathewG, et al. (2021) PRISMA 2020 statement: what's new and the importance of reporting guidelines. International Journal of Surgery88: 105918.
80.
TangT (2011) Marketing higher education across borders: a cross-cultural analysis of university websites in the US and China. Chinese Journal of Communication4(4): 417–429.
81.
UrquíaI (2024) Spanish universities on TikTok: the effectiveness of trends and challenges in generating engagement. Visual Review. International Visual Culture Review Revista Internacional De Cultura Visual16(8): 15–27.
82.
Van RaanAF (2004) Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics59: 467–472.
83.
WeerasingheISFernandoRL (2017) Students’ satisfaction in higher education. American Journal of Educational Research5(5): 533–539.
84.
WhelanSWohlfeilM (2006) Communicating brands through engagement with “lived” experiences. Journal of Brand Management13: 313–329.
85.
WilkinsSHeL (2022) Student mobility in transnational higher education: study abroad at international branch campuses. Journal of Studies in International Education26(1): 97–115.
86.
XiaoYWatsonM (2019) Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research39(1): 93–112.
87.
ZupicIČaterT (2015) Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods18(3): 429–472.
