As reflected in the Sustainable Development Goal 4.6, reading literacy is a cornerstone of education, which makes it essential to understand factors affecting this educational goal. With reading literacy as the educational outcome and the educational prosperity framework as the basis, three related hypotheses (H1–H3) are tested with data from the Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics (SEA-PLM), the first cross-country student assessment in that region. In line with current regional priorities, the study focusses on three key variables: how parental attitudes towards learning (H2) and preschool attendance (H3) mediate the effects of socio-economic status (SES, H1) on reading literacy. Moreover, other influencing variables such as gender, literacy resources at home, grade repetition, outside school activities, learning time at school, teacher absenteeism, and student interest at school are included in consideration of the complexity of factors affecting reading literacy. SmartPLS (Partial Least Squares) analyses of data from more than 31,000 primary school students (Grade 5) in over 1000 schools reveal positive effects of both, parental attitudes towards learning and preschool attendance, on primary students’ reading literacy in the six participating countries: Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Viet Nam. These results indicate that – over and above the strong effects of SES – policy support of interventions for improving parental attitudes towards their children’s education and preschool attendance are effective investments to benefit the reading literacy skills of students near the end of their basic education.
AdrianyVGunawanIAnggorowatiR (2022) Early childhood education and legacy of neoliberalism in Southeast Asian countries: case study of Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam and Myanmar. World Education Patterns in the Global South: The Ebb of Global Forces and the Flow of Contextual Imperatives. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 79–95.
2.
Al-MatalkaFIM (2014) The influence of parental socioeconomic status on their involvement at home. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science4(5): 146–154.
3.
AlampayLPGarciaAS (2019) Education and parenting in the Philippines. In: School Systems, Parent Behavior, and Academic Achievement. Cham: Springer, 79–94.
4.
AndersonRCWilsonPTFieldingLG (1988) Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly23: 285–303.
5.
ASEAN (2014) ASEAN State of Education Report 2013. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat.
6.
ASEAN (2019) ASEAN Key Figures 2019. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN – ASEAN Secretariat.
7.
AuldEXiaominLMorrisP (2020) Piloting PISA for development to success: an analysis of its findings, framework and recommendations. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education52: 1145–1169.
8.
BakkenLBrownNDowningB (2017) Early childhood education: the long-term benefits. Journal of Research in Childhood Education31(2): 255–269.
9.
BakkerJDenessenE (2007) The concept of parental involvement. Some theoretical and empirical considerations. International Journal about Parents in Education1: 188–199.
10.
BanerjeeRKingEMOrazemPF, et al. (2012) Student and teacher attendance: the role of shared goods in reducing absenteeism. Economics of Education Review31(5): 563–574.
11.
BeegleKDehejiaRGattiR (2009) Why should we care about child labor? The education, labor market, and health consequences of child labor. Journal of Human Resources44(4): 871–889.
BezerraMEKassoufALArends-KuenningM (2009) The impact of child labor and school quality on academic achievement in Brazil.
14.
BlackATSederRCKekahioW (2014) Review of Research on Student Nonenrollment and Chronic Absenteeism: A Report for the Pacific Region (REL 2015–054). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Pacific. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
15.
BorgonoviFMonttG (2012) Parental involvement in selected PISA countries and economies.
16.
BreseFMirazchiyskiP (2010) Measuring students’ family background in large-scale education studies. In: Paper presented at the 4th IEA international research conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1–3 July 2010.
17.
BreseFMirazchiyskiP (2013) Measuring Students’ Family Background in Large-Scale International Education Studies. IERI Monograph Series, Vol. 2.
18.
CastroMExposito-CasasELopez-MartinE, et al. (2015) Parental involvement on student academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review14: 33–46.
19.
ChenSY (2008) Who is the avid adolescent reader in Taiwan? The role of gender, family and teacher. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy52(3): 214–223.
20.
ChenSYChangYJKoHW (2011) The influence of parental education level, parental reading attitude, and current home reading activities on students' reading attainment. Findings from the PIRLS 200643(S): 357–376.
21.
CheungKCMakSKSitPS, et al. (2021) Secondary analysis of PISA data for grade level effect due to grade repetition on improvement in reading performance. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community11(1/2): 180–194.
22.
ChoiÁGilMMediavillaM, et al. (2016). Double toil and trouble: grade retention and academic performance.
23.
DagnewA (2017) The relationship between students' attitudes towards school, values of education, achievement motivation and academic achievement in Gondar Secondary Schools, Ethiopia. Research in Pedagogy7(1): 30–42.
24.
DarmawanIGNDharmapatniAASSK (2024) A multilevel analysis of student and school characteristics associated with 15-year-olds’ reading performances: a Southeast Asian perspective. Large-scale Assessessments in Education12: 40.
25.
DavidCCAlbertJRGVizmanosJFV (2018) Sustainable Development Goal 5: How Does the Philippines Fare on Gender Equality?Quezon City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS).
26.
de MendizábalACIzquierdoMGBordalejoMM, et al. (2018) Predictors and effects of grade repetition in Spain. Revista de Economia Mundial48: 21–42.
27.
DeasleySEvansMANowakS, et al. (2018) Sex differences in emergent literacy and reading behaviour in junior kindergarten. Canadian Journal of School Psychology33(1): 26–43.
28.
DiemerMAMistryRSLόpezI, et al. (2013) Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy13(1): 77–114.
29.
DuncanLGSeymourPH (2000) Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy. British Journal of Psychology91(2): 145–166.
30.
EgaliteAJ (2016) How family background influences student achievement. Education Next16(2): 70–78.
31.
EmersonPMPonczekVSouzaAP (2017) Child labor and learning. Economic Development and Cultural Change65(2): 265–296.
32.
EvansMDKelleyJSikoraJ, et al. (2010) Family scholarly culture and educational success: books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility28(2): 171–197.
33.
FanXTChenM (2001) Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review13: 1–22.
34.
FeinsteinLSabatesR (2006) Does Education Have an Impact on Mothers' Educational Attitudes and Behaviours?[Wider Benefits of Learning Research Report No. 16]. London, England: Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning, Institute of Education, University of London.
35.
GarciaA (2018) Parental Involvement Among Low-Income Filipinos: A Phenomenological Inquiry. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
36.
GeisserS (1974) A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika61(1): 101–107.
37.
GolanAJudgeGMillerD (1996) Maximum Entropy Exonometrics: Robust Estimation with Limited Data. New York: Wiley.
38.
GoldfeldSMoreno-BetancurMGuoS, et al. (2021) Inequities in children’s reading skills: the role of home reading and preschool attendance. Academic Pediatrics21(6): 1046–1054.
39.
GrahamSLiuXAitkenA, et al. (2018) Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: a meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly53(3): 279–304.
40.
GunnarssonVOrazemPFSánchezMA (2006) Child labor and school achievement in Latin America. The World Bank Economic Review20(1): 31–54.
41.
HairJFJrHultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2021) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
42.
HanushekEAPetersonPETalpeyLM, et al. (2019) The Unwavering SES Achievement Gap: Trends in US Student Performance (No. W25648). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
43.
HarrisAGoodallJ (2008) Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research50(3): 277–289.
HeadyC (2003) The effect of child labor on learning achievement. World Development31(2): 385–398.
46.
HemmerechtsKAgirdagOKavadiasD (2017) The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Educational Review69(1): 85–101.
47.
HenselerJ (2018) Partial least squares path modeling: quo vadis?Quality and Quantity52(1): 1–8.
48.
HoffELaursenB (2019) Socioeconomic status and parenting. In: Handbook of Parenting. New York: Routledge, 421–447.
49.
HolmesWReidDDowkerA (2012) Early intervention to prevent long-term literacy difficulties: the case of Catch up Literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences46: 4498–4503.
50.
JanssenMBakkerJTBosmanAM, et al. (2012) Differential trust between parents and teachers of children from low-income and immigrant backgrounds. Educational Studies38(4): 383–396.
51.
JehangirKGlasCAvan den BergS (2015) Exploring the relation between socio-economic status and reading achievement in PISA 2009 through an intercepts-and-slopes-as-outcomes paradigm. International Journal of Educational Research71: 1–15.
KhorramdelLPokropekAJooSH, et al. (2020) Examining gender DIF and gender differences in the PISA 2018 reading literacy scale: a partial invariance approach. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling62(2): 179–231.
54.
LeeMGoodmanCDandapaniN, et al. (2015) Review of international research on factors underlying teacher absenteeism. REL 2015-087. Regional Educational Laboratory Pacific.
55.
LeeJKimHRheeDE (2021) No harmless child labor: the effect of child labor on academic achievement in francophone Western and Central Africa. International Journal of Educational Development80: 102308.
56.
LietzP (2006) A meta-analysis of gender differences in reading achievement at the secondary school level. Studies In Educational Evaluation32(4): 317–344.
57.
MarksGN (2020) Is the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and student achievement causal? Considering student and parent abilities. Educational Research and Evaluation26(7–8): 344–367.
MuntoniFRetelsdorfJ (2018) Gender-specific teacher expectations in reading—The role of teachers’ gender stereotypes. Contemporary Educational Psychology54: 212–220.
60.
MuthénBMuthénL (2017) Mplus. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 507–518.
61.
MwomaTB (2018) Preschool attendance and children’s reading ability: a case of Narok County Kenya. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives17(4): 83–96.
PereiraJD (2016) Equity, access and educational quality in three South-East Asian countries.
67.
PrudencioM (2020) The effect of parental characteristics and home resources on reading performance of 15-year old students in the Philippines. The New Educational Review62(4): 67–79.
68.
RingleCMSarstedtM (2016) Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: the importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management and Data Systems116(9): 1865–1886.
69.
RodriguezAMChuaPG (2021) Growing steady and strong: early childhood development regional guidance in East Asia and the Pacific. UNICEF.
70.
RoubinovDSBoyceWT (2017) Parenting and SES: relative values or enduring principles?Current opinion in psychology15: 162–167.
71.
SaegertSCAdlerNEBullockHE, et al. (2007) Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72.
Sandoval-HernandezAZhaoDChenZ, et al. (2022) The association between educational systems and reading literacy performance in PISA across Asia-Pacific region and countries. International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific. Singapore: Springer, 1–15.
73.
SarstedtMWilczynskiPMelewarTC (2013) Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities. Journal of World Business48(3): 329–339.
74.
SchofieldHL (1980) Reading attitude and achievement: teacher-pupil relationships. The Journal of Educational Research74(2): 111–119.
SheraP (2014) School effects, gender and socioeconomic differences in reading performance: a multilevel analysis. International Education Studies7(11): 28–39.
77.
SinharayS (2010) An overview of statistics in education. International Encyclopedia of Education. 3rd edition. Singapore: Springer, 1–11.
78.
SirinSR (2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research75(3): 417–453.
79.
SitPSCheungKCCheongWC, et al. (2015) What studying problems are faced by the adolescent grade repeaters in Macao: uncovering underlying mechanisms based on evidences from the PISA 2012 Study. Asia Pacific Education Review16: 367–377.
80.
StoneM (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B36(2): 111–133.
81.
StullJC (2013) Family socioeconomic status, parent expectations, and a child's achievement. Research in Education90(1): 53–67.
82.
SyamsuriASBancongH (2022) Do gender and regional differences affect students' reading literacy? A case study in Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics8(1): 97–110.
83.
Tatel-SuatengcoRFloridaJS (2020) Family literacy in a low-income urban community in the Philippines. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy20(2): 327–355.
84.
TenenhausMVinziVEChatelinYM, et al. (2005) PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis48(1): 159–205.
85.
Trawick-SmithJ (2014) The Physical Play and Motor Development of Young Children: A Review of Literature and Implications for Practice. Connecticut: Center for Early Childhood Education, Eastern Connecticut State University.
86.
TseSKLamRYLamJW, et al. (2006) Attitudes and attainment: a comparison of Hong Kong, Singaporean and English students' reading. Research in Education76(1): 74–87.
87.
UNICEF and SEAMEO. (2017). Southeast Asia primary learning Metrics (SEA-PLM) assessment framework.
88.
UNICEF and SEAMEO (2020) SEA-PLM 2019 Main Regional Report, Children’s Learning in 6 Southeast Asian Countries. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) & Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) – SEA-PLM Secretariat. https://www.seaplm.org/PUBLICATIONS/regionalresults/SEA-PLM2019MainRegionalReport.pdf
89.
United Nations (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
90.
van BergenEvan ZuijenTBishopD, et al. (2017) Why are home literacy environment and children's reading skills associated? What parental skills reveal. Reading Research Quarterly52(2): 147–160.
91.
WangLLiuD (2021) Unpacking the relations between home literacy environment and word reading in Chinese children: the influence of parental responsive behaviors and parents’ difficulties with literacy activities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly56: 190–200.
92.
WillmsJD (2018) Educational Prosperity: an assessment strategy for supporting student learning in low-income countries. In: Learning at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Science, Measurement and Policy in Low-Income Countries. Paris, France: UNESCO-IIEP.
93.
WillmsJDTramonteL (2015) Towards the development of contextual questionnaires for the PISA for development study.
94.
WoldHOA (1974) Causal flows with latent variables: partings of the ways in the light of NIPALS modelling. European Economic Review5(1): 67–86.
World Health Organization (2023) Regional Consultation on Parent Support for Early Childhood Development and Adolescent Health in South-East Asia (No. SEA-CAH-44). New Delhi: World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia.
99.
YuliantiKDenessenEJPGDroopW (2018) The effects of parental involvement on children's education: a study in elementary schools in Indonesia.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
