Psychometric properties of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening for Preschool (PALSPreK) instrument were investigated in a sample of 4,518 children. PALS-PreK figures prominently in state and federal early literacy programs as an assessment of emergent literacy skills in preschool-aged children. Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and multigroup CFA were employed to evaluate the underlying factor structure and determine whether the identified structure was invariant across boys and girls. Results suggest that PALSPreK effectively measures the most important precursors to successful literacy acquisition: alphabet knowledge, phonological awareness, and print concepts, with generally the same degree of accuracy for boys and girls. These results, combined with the instructional transparency of the instrument, support the educational utility of PALS-PreK as a tool for guiding instruction in preschool literacy.
Adams, M.J. ( 1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print . Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
Barnett, S., Hustedt, J.T., Friedman, A.H., Boyd, J.S., & Ainsworth, P. ( 2007). The state of preschool 2007: State preschool yearbook . New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Retrieved September 2, 2008 , from http://nieer.org/yearbook2007/pdf/yearbook
3.
Barnett, W.S., Hustedt, J.T., Hawkinson, L.E., & Robin, K.B. ( 2006). The state of preschool 2006: State preschool yearbook . New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Retrieved February 2, 2009 , from http://nieer.org/yearbook2006/pdf/yearbook.pdf
4.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. ( 1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. ( 1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection . Nature, 301, 419-421.
6.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. ( 1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Byrne, B.M. ( 2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Cattell, R.B. ( 1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
10.
Dickinson, D., & Neuman, S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford .
11.
Duncan, G.J., Dowsett, C.J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement . Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428-1446.
12.
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. ( 1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling , 6, 56-83.
13.
Gillon, G.T. ( 2004). Phonological Awareness: From Research ot Practice. New York: Guildford Press.
14.
Gough, P.B., Tunmer, W.E. ( 1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
15.
Guttman, L. ( 1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis . Psychometrika, 19, 149-161.
16.
Horn, J.L. ( 1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
17.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
19.
International Reading Association & National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1998). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Young Children, 53, 3-46.
20.
Invernizzi, M., Sullivan, A., & Meier, J. ( 2001). Phonological awareness literacy screening (PALS Pre-K) . Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
21.
Invernizzi, M., Sullivan, A., Meier, J., & Swank, L. ( 2004). Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening: Preschool (PALS-PreK). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
22.
Justice, L.M., Skibbe, L., Canning, A., & Lankford, C. ( 2005). Preschoolers, print, and storybooks: An observational study using eye-gaze analyses. Journal of Research in Reading , 28, 229-243.
23.
Kaplan, D. ( 1990). Evaluating and modifying covariance structure models: A review and recommendation. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 25, 137-155.
24.
Keith, T.Z., Fugate, M.H., DeGraff, M., Dimond, C.M., Shadrach, E.A., & Stevens, M.L. ( 1995). Using multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis to test for construct bias: An example using the K-ABC. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 347-364.
25.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
26.
Ledesma, R.D., & Valero-Mora, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12, 1-11.
27.
Lonigan, C.J. ( 2006a). Conceptualizing phonological processing skills in prereaders . In D. Dickinson & S. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 77-89). New York: Guilford .
28.
Lonigan, C.J. ( 2006b). Development, assessment, and promotion of preliteracy skills. Early Education and Development, 17, 91-114.
29.
Lonigan, C.J., Burgess, S.R., & Anthony, J.L. ( 2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study . Developmental Psychology, 36, 596-613.
30.
Lonigan, C.J., Schatschneider, C., Westberg, L., & National Early Literacy Panel. ( 2008). Identification of children’s skills and abilities linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling. In National Early Literacy Panel, Developing early literacy, report of the National Early Literacy Panel: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention (pp. 55-106). Washington, DC: National Center for Family Literacy.
31.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. ( 1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159-173.
32.
MacCallum, R.C., & Tucker, L.R. ( 1991). Representing sources of error in common factor analysis: Implications for theory and practice. Psychological Bulletin , 109, 501-511.
33.
Marsh, H.W. ( 1993). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841-860.
34.
Mehta, P.D., Foorman, B.R., Branaum-Martin, L., & Taylor, W.P. ( 2005). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 92, 85-116.
35.
National Center for Education Statistics, U. S. Department of Education. (2006). Common core of data. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd
36.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
37.
Neuman, S., & Dickinson, D. ( 2001). Handbook of early literacy research. New York: Guilford.
38.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. Title 1, 115 STAT. 1428, part B, subpart 2, § 1221 et seq. Retrieved 5/29/2009 from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
39.
O’Connor, B.P. ( 2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 396-402.
40.
Roskos, K., & Vukelich, C. ( 2006). Early literacy policy and pedagogy. In D. Dickinson & S. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 295-308). New York: Guilford.
41.
Schatschneider, C., & Westberg, L. ( 2005). Findings from the national early literacy panel: Implications for early screening. Prepublication draft retrieved on January 10, 2008, from http://www.ncld.org/content/view/485/392/
42.
Senechal, M., LeFevre, J., Smith-Chant, B.L., & Colton, K.V. ( 2001). On refining theoretical models of emergent literacy: The role of empirical evidence. Journal of School Psychology , 39, 439-460.
43.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45.
Storch, S.A., & Whitehurst, G.J. (2002). Oral languages and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934-947.
46.
Strickland, D.S., & Shanahan, T. ( 2004) Laying the groundwork for literacy, Preliminary report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Educational Leadership , 61, 74-77.
47.
Tanaka, J.S. ( 1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. S. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Teale, W.H., & Sulzby, E. ( 1986). Emergent literacy as a perspective for examining how young children become writers and readers. In W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. vii-xxv). Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
49.
Thompson, B. ( 2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Virginia Department of Education. (2005). Virginia’s foundation blocks for early learning: Standards for literacy, mathematics, science, and history and social science. Richmond: Commonweath of Virginia Board of Education . Retrieved on 29th May, 2009, from http://www.doe.virginia.gov/VDOE/Instruction/Elem_M/FoundationBlocks.pdf
51.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). A synopsis of the 2006 Early Reading First project grantees [CFDA#84359B] . Washington, DC: Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education .
52.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Early Reading First annual performance report data. Retrieved on 29th May, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/earlyreading/performance.html
53.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2006). Federal and state funding for early care and education . Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, National Child Care Information & Technical Assistance Center. Retrieved on 29th May, 2009, from http://www.nccic.org/poptopics/ecarefunding.html
54.
Whitehurst, G.J., & Lonigan, C.J. ( 2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers . In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11-29). New York: Guilford.
