Opportunities to learn related to the use of quantitative reasoning to solve higher-order real-world applications that reflect the messy nature of the world are scarce and vary across countries. Those experiences are essential to the development of quantitative literacy. This literacy, like that related to language, is critical for all children. To examine this issue, 19 countries were involved in a study that analyzed the degree of emphasis placed on quantitative literacy in their curriculum standards. Most countries have such policies but vary appreciably regarding their degree of emphasis. Furthermore, the countries’ 8th grade textbooks were analyzed to determine the degree to which those books provided opportunities to develop quantitative literacy. The results identified a major policy-practice gap.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990) Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnaniadouKClaroM (2009) 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries EDU Working Papers, No. 41. Paris: OECD Publishing.
3.
BonneyCRSternbergRJ (2011) Learning to think critically. In: MayerREAlexanderPA (eds) Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. New York: Routledge, 166–196.
4.
DingmanSTeuscherDNewtonJA, et al. (2013) Common mathematics standards in the United States: a comparison of K-8 state and Common Core Standards. The Elementary School Journal113(4): 541–564.
5.
EdwardsAREsmondeIWagnerJF (2011) Learning mathematics. In: MayerREAlexanderPA (eds) Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. New York: Routledge, 55–77.
6.
EricssonKAKrampeRTTesch-RomerC (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review100(3): 363–406.
FriesLSonJYGivvinKB, et al. (2021) Practicing connections: a framework to guide instructional design for developing understanding in complex domains. Educational Psychology Review33: 739–762. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09561-x.
9.
GalI (1997) Numeracy: imperatives of a forgotten goal. In: SteenLA (ed) Why Numbers Count: Quantitative Literacy of Tomorrow’s America. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 36–44.
10.
MaslihahSWaluyaSBKartonoR, et al. (2021) Increasing mathematical literacy ability and learning independence through problem-based learning model with realistic mathematic education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1918: 042123. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1918/042123.
11.
National Research Council (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with Additional Material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, National Research Council.
12.
National Research Council (2001) Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy Press.
13.
National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In PellegrinoJWHiltonML, Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, & Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 242.
14.
National Research Council (2013) The Mathematical Sciences in 2025. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 205.
PeterEE (2012) Critical thinking: essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research5(3): 39–43.
20.
PollakHO (1969) How can we teach applications of mathematics?Educational Studies in Mathematics2(2/3): 393–404.
21.
SchmidtWHHouangRTCoganLS, et al. (2019) Schooling across the globe: What we have learned from 60 years of mathematics and science international assessments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SchmidtWHMcKnightCCHouangRT, et al. (2001) Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
SchmidtWHMcKnightCCValverdeGA, et al. (1997) Many Visions, Many Aims. Dordrecht: Springer.
24.
SchmidtWHTaoXGuoS, et al. (2022) Achieving excellence and equality in mathematics: Two degrees of freedom?Journal of Curriculum Studies54(6): 772–791.
25.
SchoenfeldAFinkHZuñiga-RuizS, et al. (2023) Helping students become powerful mathematical thinkers. In: Case Studies of Teaching for Robust Understanding. New York, London: Routledge.
26.
SonJYBlakeABFriesL, et al. (2021) Modeling first: applying learning science to the teaching of introductory statistics. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education29(1): 4–21. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1844106.
27.
SteenLA (ed) (2001) Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
28.
Vincent-LancrinSGonzález-SanchoCBouckaertM, et al. (2019) Fostering Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking: What it Means in School. Paris: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/62212c37-en.
29.
WilkinsJLM (2000) Special issue article: preparing for the 21st century: the status of quantitative literacy in the United States: this article continues our October 2000 special issue theme of “A vision for science and mathematics education in the 21st century.”. School Science & Mathematics100: 405–418.
