Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics and Related Assessment and Teacher Evaluation Systems

Abstract

In this study, U.S. middle school teachers’ perceptions of Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM), CCSSM-related assessments, teacher evaluation processes, and resources for implementing CCSSM were investigated. Using a mixed methods design, a national sample of 366 teachers was surveyed, and 24 teachers were interviewed. Findings indicated that teachers viewed CCSSM as including new content for their grade level. Teachers also reported using multiple curriculum resources to align with CCSSM and indicated that new assessments would serve as a proxy for CCSSM. Implications for rapidly changing policy, curriculum, assessment, instruction, and professional development related to CCSSM are discussed.

Keywords

curriculum materials mathematics curriculum standards teachers’ perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

(2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258-267.

Ball

(1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466.

Billstein

Williamson

(1998). Middle Grades MATH Thematics. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell.

Bogdan

Biklen

(2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Carmichael

S. B.

Martino

Porter-Magee

Wilson

W. S.

(2010). The state of state standards—And the Common Core—In 2010. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

Carter

Cuevas

Day

Malloy

(2013). Glencoe Math. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Choppin

Davis

Drake

Roth McDuffie

(2013). Middle school teachers’ perceptions of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics and related assessment and teacher evaluation systems. Rochester, NY: Warner Center for Professional Development and Education Reform. Retrieved from http://www.warner.rochester.edu/files/warnercenter/docs/commoncoremathreport2.pdf

Cogan

Schmidt

Houang

(2013, January). Implementing the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: What we know about teachers of mathematics in 41 states (Working Paper No. 33). East Lansing: The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.

Cohen

(1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 327-345.

10.

Cohen

Hill

(2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

Cohen

Radenbush

Ball

(2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142.

12.

Collins

Amrein-Beardsley

(2014). Putting growth and value-added models on the map: A national overview. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1-32.

13.

Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2011). Progressions for the Common Core State Standards. Retrieved from http://commoncoretools.files.wordpress.com

14.

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf

15.

Confrey

Krupa

(2012). The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: How did we get here and what needs to happen next? In Hirsch

C. R.

Lappan

G. T.

Reys

B. J.

(Eds.), Curriculum issues in an era of Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (pp. 3-16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

16.

Corbin

Strauss

(2008). Basics of qualitative research, 3e. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

17.

Creswell

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Davis

Choppin

Drake

Roth McDuffie

(2014). Factors underlying middle school teachers’ perceptions of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9 (3), 11-25.

19.

Davis

Choppin

Drake

Roth McDuffie

(in press). Factors underlying middle school teachers’ perceptions of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Middle Grades Research Journal.

20.

Davis

Choppin

Roth McDuffie

Drake

(2013). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Middle school teachers’ perceptions. Rochester, NY: Warner Center for Professional Development and Education Reform. Retrieved from http://www.warner.rochester.edu/files/warnercenter/docs/commoncoremathreport.pdf.

21.

Drake

Sherin

M. G.

(2009). Developing curriculum vision and trust: Changes in teachers’ curriculum strategies. In Remillard

Herbel-Eisenmann

Lloyd

(Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 321-337). New York, NY: Routledge.

22.

Duncan

(2009a, July). Partners in reform. Address by the Secretary of Education at the 2009 Governors Education Symposium. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/2009-2.html

23.

Duncan

(2009b, June). States will lead the way towards reform. Address by the Secretary of Education at the 2009 Governors Education Symposium. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/06/06142009.pdf

24.

EPE Research Center. (2013). Findings from a national survey of teacher perspectives on the Common Core. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/media/epe_survey_teacher_perspctives_common_core_2013.pdf

25.

Feistritzer

C. E.

(2011). Profile of teachers in the U.S. 2011. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/07/07022009.pdf

26.

Fennell

Johnson

Milou

Murphy

Schielack

Sherman

. . . Wiggins

(2010). Digits. New York, NY: Pearson.

27.

Freeman

D. J.

Porter

A. C.

(1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26, 403-421.

28.

Gates Foundation & Scholastic Inc. (2012). Primary sources 2012: America’s teachers on the teaching profession. Seattle, WA: Gates Foundation.

29.

Grouws

D. A.

Smith

M. S.

Sztajn

(2004). The preparation and teaching practices of United States mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8. In Kloosterman

Lester

F. K.

(Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 221-267). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

30.

Hart Research Associates. (2013). Teachers assess implementation of the Common Core. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/news/ppt_ccss-pollresults2013.pdf

31.

Hill

(2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 289-318.

32.

Hull

(2013). Trends in teacher evaluation: How states are measuring teacher performance. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Evaluating-performance/Trends-in-Teacher-Evaluation-At-A-Glance/Trends-in-Teacher-Evaluation-Full-Report-PDF.pdf

33.

Lappan

Fey

J. T.

Fitzgerald

W. M.

Friel

S. N.

Phillips

E. D.

(2006). Connected mathematics 2. Boston, MA: Pearson.

34.

Lappan

Fey

J. T.

Fitzgerald

W. M.

Friel

S. N.

Phillips

E. D.

(2014). Connected mathematics 3. Boston, MA: Pearson.

35.

Liang

Akiba

(2015). Teacher evaluation, performance-related pay, and constructivist instruction. Education Policy, 29, 375-401. doi:10.1177/0895904813492379

36.

Miles

Huberman

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

37.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

38.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

39.

Palmer

Rangel

(2011). High stakes accountability and policy implementation: Teacher decision making in bilingual classrooms in Texas. Educational Policy, 25, 614-647.

40.

Porter

McMaken

Hwang

Yang

(2011). Common Core Standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103-116.

41.

Ravitch

(2013, August 24). The biggest fallacy of the Common Core Standards. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diane-ravitch/common-core-fallacy_b_3809159.html

42.

Rentner

D. S.

(2013). Year three of implementing the Common Core State Standards: An overview of states’ progress and challenges. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

43.

Rentner

D. S.

Kober

(2014). Common Core State Standards in 2014: Curriculum and professional development at the district level. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

44.

Reys

B. J.

(Ed.). (2006). The intended mathematics curriculum as represented in state-level curriculum standards: Consensus or confusion? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

45.

Reys

B. J.

Dougherty

B. J.

Olson

T. A.

Thomas

(2012). Common Core State Standards for middle grades mathematics: Implications for curriculum and instruction. In Hirsch

C. R.

Lappan

G. T.

Reys

B. J.

(Eds.), Curriculum issues in an era of Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (pp. 33-46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

46.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

47.

Schmidt

W. H.

Houang

(2012). Curricular coherence and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41, 294-308.

48.

Schmidt

W. H.

Wang

McKnight

(2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of U.S. mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 525-559.

49.

Sloan

(2010). Coming to terms with Common Core Standards. Info Brief, 16(4). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/policy-priorities/vol16/issue4/full/Coming-to-Terms-with-Common-Core-Standards.aspx

50.

Spillane

J. P.

Zeuli

J. S.

(1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 1-27.

51.

Tarr

Reys

R. E.

Reys

B. J.

Chavez

Shih

Osterlind

(2008). The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 247-280.

52.

Woolard

(2013). Prelude to the Common Core: Internationally benchmarking a state’s math standards. Educational Policy, 24, 615-644.

53.

Yoshikawa

(2008). Education ministry perspectives on mathematics curriculum in Japan. In Usiskin

Willmore

(Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in Pacific Rim countries—China, Japan, Korea and Singapore: Proceedings of a conference (pp. 9-21). Chicago, IL: Information Age Publishing.